Fabian Fastenrath, Katherine Sattler, Daniel Duerschmied, Michal Lewandowski, Ibrahim Akin, Juergen Kuschyk
{"title":"Contemporary implantable cardiac device trials for sudden cardiac death and future guidelines: how can we shape the future?","authors":"Fabian Fastenrath, Katherine Sattler, Daniel Duerschmied, Michal Lewandowski, Ibrahim Akin, Juergen Kuschyk","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2026.2621666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major cause of mortality despite substantial progress in heart failure management and arrhythmia prevention. Current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) guideline recommendations, mainly based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), are largely derived from historical trials and may no longer reflect contemporary patient populations or therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review critically appraises the historical and contemporary ICD evidence base with particular attention to evolving background therapy, competing risks of non-arrhythmic death, device technology, and modern risk stratification strategies. ICD trials cited in major international guidelines were reviewed and supplemented by a targeted PubMed literature search using ICD-related keywords, including relevant publications through September 2025. We emphasize emerging tools such as cardiac magnetic-resonance-imaging, genomics, artificial intelligence, remote monitoring data, and modular cardiac rhythm management systems.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>We propose a future ICD trial framework grounded in multimodal risk assessment, competing-risk-adjusted endpoints, pragmatic and adaptive trial designs, and device-specific evaluation pathways. We further outline how future guidelines may evolve to incorporate enriched patient phenotyping, precision risk prediction, and personalized device selection. Together, these developments signal a paradigm shift toward an individualized, digitally supported, and modular approach to SCD prevention in the next decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2026.2621666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major cause of mortality despite substantial progress in heart failure management and arrhythmia prevention. Current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) guideline recommendations, mainly based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), are largely derived from historical trials and may no longer reflect contemporary patient populations or therapies.
Areas covered: This review critically appraises the historical and contemporary ICD evidence base with particular attention to evolving background therapy, competing risks of non-arrhythmic death, device technology, and modern risk stratification strategies. ICD trials cited in major international guidelines were reviewed and supplemented by a targeted PubMed literature search using ICD-related keywords, including relevant publications through September 2025. We emphasize emerging tools such as cardiac magnetic-resonance-imaging, genomics, artificial intelligence, remote monitoring data, and modular cardiac rhythm management systems.
Expert opinion: We propose a future ICD trial framework grounded in multimodal risk assessment, competing-risk-adjusted endpoints, pragmatic and adaptive trial designs, and device-specific evaluation pathways. We further outline how future guidelines may evolve to incorporate enriched patient phenotyping, precision risk prediction, and personalized device selection. Together, these developments signal a paradigm shift toward an individualized, digitally supported, and modular approach to SCD prevention in the next decade.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.