Comparing Surgical Management and Reconstruction of Breast Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Center and an Associated Safety-Net Institution

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2025.11.012
Charles A. Keane , Magdalena A. Iannello , Sumeet S. Teotia , Nicholas T. Haddock , Lisa Wintonli
{"title":"Comparing Surgical Management and Reconstruction of Breast Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Center and an Associated Safety-Net Institution","authors":"Charles A. Keane ,&nbsp;Magdalena A. Iannello ,&nbsp;Sumeet S. Teotia ,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Haddock ,&nbsp;Lisa Wintonli","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the rates of breast conservation therapy and mastectomy with and without immediate postmastectomy reconstruction (IPMR) amongst racially distinct subgroups being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Women who received NAC for newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2010 to 2017 were identified from an institutional tumor registry at a tertiary care center and an associated safety-net institution. Patient demographics, insurance status, tumor characteristics, and surgical procedures were compared after women were stratified by race.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the tertiary care facility, a higher proportion of White women were treated with bilateral mastectomy (35.7%) compared to Black (19.3%) and Hispanic women (9.8%). White women were also more likely to receive IPMR as compared to Black and Hispanic women (63.7% vs. 42.7% and 33.3% respectively). At the associated safety-net institution, women were more likely to undergo a unilateral mastectomy, regardless of race, and there was no statistical difference in the rates of IPMR amongst the different racial cohorts (17.2%-18.7%). IPMR was performed in 52.4% of cases at the tertiary care center compared to 18.2% at the safety-net institution.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite controlling for confounding factors, disparities exist in the treatment of breast cancer patients. This study focuses on differing rates of mastectomy and IPMR when comparing an associated tertiary care center and safety-net institution. The discrepancy is profound and appears to be driven by race, insurance, and institution type.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820925003404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the rates of breast conservation therapy and mastectomy with and without immediate postmastectomy reconstruction (IPMR) amongst racially distinct subgroups being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods

Women who received NAC for newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2010 to 2017 were identified from an institutional tumor registry at a tertiary care center and an associated safety-net institution. Patient demographics, insurance status, tumor characteristics, and surgical procedures were compared after women were stratified by race.

Results

At the tertiary care facility, a higher proportion of White women were treated with bilateral mastectomy (35.7%) compared to Black (19.3%) and Hispanic women (9.8%). White women were also more likely to receive IPMR as compared to Black and Hispanic women (63.7% vs. 42.7% and 33.3% respectively). At the associated safety-net institution, women were more likely to undergo a unilateral mastectomy, regardless of race, and there was no statistical difference in the rates of IPMR amongst the different racial cohorts (17.2%-18.7%). IPMR was performed in 52.4% of cases at the tertiary care center compared to 18.2% at the safety-net institution.

Conclusion

Despite controlling for confounding factors, disparities exist in the treatment of breast cancer patients. This study focuses on differing rates of mastectomy and IPMR when comparing an associated tertiary care center and safety-net institution. The discrepancy is profound and appears to be driven by race, insurance, and institution type.
比较三级保健中心和相关安全网机构乳腺癌患者的手术管理和重建。
目的:本研究旨在评估在接受新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗的不同种族亚组中,乳房保留治疗和乳房切除术伴和不伴立即乳房切除术后重建(IPMR)的比率。方法:从三级保健中心和相关安全网机构的机构肿瘤登记处确定2010年至2017年因新诊断的乳腺癌接受NAC治疗的妇女。在女性按种族分层后,比较患者人口统计、保险状况、肿瘤特征和手术程序。结果:在三级医疗机构,白人妇女接受双侧乳房切除术的比例(35.7%)高于黑人妇女(19.3%)和西班牙裔妇女(9.8%)。与黑人和西班牙裔女性相比,白人女性接受IPMR的可能性也更高(分别为63.7%对42.7%和33.3%)。在相关的安全网机构中,不分种族,女性更有可能接受单侧乳房切除术,不同种族人群中IPMR的发生率没有统计学差异(17.2%-18.7%)。在三级保健中心,52.4%的病例进行了IPMR,而在安全网机构,这一比例为18.2%。结论:在控制混杂因素的情况下,乳腺癌患者的治疗存在差异。本研究的重点是在比较相关三级保健中心和安全网机构时,乳房切除术和IPMR的不同比率。这种差异是深刻的,似乎是由种族、保险和机构类型驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书