First or best? Contrasting approaches reveal different outcomes in tadpole (Hypsiboas lundii) escape performance under acute chlorpyrifos exposure

IF 1.6 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Processes Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2026.105342
David Sánchez-Domene , Alba Navarro Lozano , Alexandre Vidotto Barboza Lima , Camila Nomura Pereira Boscolo , Amanda Huga Magrini , Eduardo Alves de Almeida
{"title":"First or best? Contrasting approaches reveal different outcomes in tadpole (Hypsiboas lundii) escape performance under acute chlorpyrifos exposure","authors":"David Sánchez-Domene ,&nbsp;Alba Navarro Lozano ,&nbsp;Alexandre Vidotto Barboza Lima ,&nbsp;Camila Nomura Pereira Boscolo ,&nbsp;Amanda Huga Magrini ,&nbsp;Eduardo Alves de Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2026.105342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Escape swimming performance tests are widely used to assess how aquatic organisms respond to environmental stressors. Two analytical approaches are commonly applied: the first response (reaction to the initial simulated predation attempt) and the best response (the highest performance among successive attempts). However, whether these approaches lead to convergent or divergent conclusions remains unclear. In this study, <em>Hypsiboas lundii</em> tadpoles were exposed for 48 h to two environmentally relevant concentrations of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (CPF; 0.6 and 1.0 μg L⁻¹). Escape performance (first and best responses) and enzymatic biomarkers (acetylcholinesterase, AChE; and carboxylesterase, CbE) were assessed in body and tail tissues. AChE activity remained unchanged, whereas CbE activity increased significantly in the body of tadpoles at the highest CPF concentration. Reduced escape performance was therefore attributed to non-cholinergic, bioenergetic mechanisms. Best response analysis revealed significant reductions in escape distance, burst speed, and escape time at the higher CPF concentration, whereas first response analysis detected no effects. Our findings demonstrate that the two analytical approaches can yield contrasting conclusions, underscoring the importance of methodological choices in behavioral ecotoxicology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 105342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635726000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Escape swimming performance tests are widely used to assess how aquatic organisms respond to environmental stressors. Two analytical approaches are commonly applied: the first response (reaction to the initial simulated predation attempt) and the best response (the highest performance among successive attempts). However, whether these approaches lead to convergent or divergent conclusions remains unclear. In this study, Hypsiboas lundii tadpoles were exposed for 48 h to two environmentally relevant concentrations of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (CPF; 0.6 and 1.0 μg L⁻¹). Escape performance (first and best responses) and enzymatic biomarkers (acetylcholinesterase, AChE; and carboxylesterase, CbE) were assessed in body and tail tissues. AChE activity remained unchanged, whereas CbE activity increased significantly in the body of tadpoles at the highest CPF concentration. Reduced escape performance was therefore attributed to non-cholinergic, bioenergetic mechanisms. Best response analysis revealed significant reductions in escape distance, burst speed, and escape time at the higher CPF concentration, whereas first response analysis detected no effects. Our findings demonstrate that the two analytical approaches can yield contrasting conclusions, underscoring the importance of methodological choices in behavioral ecotoxicology.
第一还是最好?不同的方法揭示了急性毒死蜱暴露下蝌蚪(Hypsiboas lundii)逃逸性能的不同结果。
逃避游泳性能测试被广泛用于评估水生生物对环境压力的反应。通常应用两种分析方法:第一反应(对初始模拟捕食尝试的反应)和最佳反应(在连续尝试中表现最好)。然而,这些方法是否会导致趋同或分歧的结论仍不清楚。在这项研究中,弓形小蝌蚪暴露于两种环境相关浓度的有机磷杀虫剂毒死蜱(CPF; 0.6和1.0μgL⁻¹)48小时。在身体和尾部组织中评估逃逸性能(第一反应和最佳反应)和酶生物标志物(乙酰胆碱酯酶,AChE和羧酸酯酶,CbE)。在CPF最高浓度下,蝌蚪体内AChE活性保持不变,而CbE活性显著升高。因此,降低的逃逸性能归因于非胆碱能,生物能量机制。最佳反应分析显示,较高CPF浓度显著降低了逃逸距离、爆发速度和逃逸时间,而第一反应分析未发现任何影响。我们的研究结果表明,这两种分析方法可以产生截然不同的结论,强调了行为生态毒理学中方法选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书