{"title":"Synthetic feedlot cattle populations for the High Plains cattle feeding area","authors":"M.L. Galyean , J.D. Rivera , K.E. Hales , B.P. Holland , T.C. Bryant","doi":"10.15232/aas.2025-02750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objective was to develop synthetic mul-tivariate normal populations of feedlot steers and heifers of various types using data from 2 cattle feeding compa-nies and to make these synthetic population data publicly available.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Close-out data from lots of cattle from 20 feedlot locations owned by Cactus Feed-ers and Five Rivers Cattle Feeding (10 locations for each company) were made available for analysis. Lots that en-compassed 6 groups of cattle were evaluated, including Native steers (3,483 and 2,777 lots for Cactus Feeders and Five Rivers, respectively); Native heifers (2,440 and 1,941 lots); Mexican steers (553 and 456 lots); Mexican heifers (132 and 174 lots); Beef × Dairy steers (474 and 71 lots); and Beef × Dairy heifers (285 and 36, lots). The SIM-NORMAL procedure of SAS was used to create multivari-ate normal populations with the following variables: initial BW, final BW, DMI, dead cattle excluded (deads-out) and dead cattle included (deads-in) ADG, and HCW. The F:G was calculated for each lot from the simulated DMI and ADG values, and DP was calculated from simulated final BW and HCW.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Means and standard devia-tions for simulated population data were nearly the same as the original close-out data for each group. Considerable variation was evident for minimum and maximum values in the synthetic populations compared with the original data, particularly for the Beef × Dairy and Mexican-origin cattle, reflecting the smaller numbers of observations in these datasets and use of the normal distribution to gener-ate the synthetic data. Indeed, abnormally low (Mexican cattle) and negative (Beef × Dairy cattle) values for initial BW were observed, indicating the need for careful data curation when sampling these synthetic populations.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Potential applica-tions for these data include economic evaluations, simu-lations related to nutrient requirement recommendations or environmental impacts of cattle feeding, and statistical applications like determining appropriate sample sizes for field experiments. The 6 synthetic populations (10,000 lot-level observations per population) we created are available for download at <span><span>https://www.depts.ttu.edu/afs/burnett_center/synthetic-populations.php</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. We intend to periodi-cally update these files to provide more robust values, par-ticularly for the Beef × Dairy and Mexican-origin popula-tions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"42 1","pages":"Pages 75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286525001119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Our objective was to develop synthetic mul-tivariate normal populations of feedlot steers and heifers of various types using data from 2 cattle feeding compa-nies and to make these synthetic population data publicly available.
Materials and Methods
Close-out data from lots of cattle from 20 feedlot locations owned by Cactus Feed-ers and Five Rivers Cattle Feeding (10 locations for each company) were made available for analysis. Lots that en-compassed 6 groups of cattle were evaluated, including Native steers (3,483 and 2,777 lots for Cactus Feeders and Five Rivers, respectively); Native heifers (2,440 and 1,941 lots); Mexican steers (553 and 456 lots); Mexican heifers (132 and 174 lots); Beef × Dairy steers (474 and 71 lots); and Beef × Dairy heifers (285 and 36, lots). The SIM-NORMAL procedure of SAS was used to create multivari-ate normal populations with the following variables: initial BW, final BW, DMI, dead cattle excluded (deads-out) and dead cattle included (deads-in) ADG, and HCW. The F:G was calculated for each lot from the simulated DMI and ADG values, and DP was calculated from simulated final BW and HCW.
Results and Discussion
Means and standard devia-tions for simulated population data were nearly the same as the original close-out data for each group. Considerable variation was evident for minimum and maximum values in the synthetic populations compared with the original data, particularly for the Beef × Dairy and Mexican-origin cattle, reflecting the smaller numbers of observations in these datasets and use of the normal distribution to gener-ate the synthetic data. Indeed, abnormally low (Mexican cattle) and negative (Beef × Dairy cattle) values for initial BW were observed, indicating the need for careful data curation when sampling these synthetic populations.
Implications and Applications
Potential applica-tions for these data include economic evaluations, simu-lations related to nutrient requirement recommendations or environmental impacts of cattle feeding, and statistical applications like determining appropriate sample sizes for field experiments. The 6 synthetic populations (10,000 lot-level observations per population) we created are available for download at https://www.depts.ttu.edu/afs/burnett_center/synthetic-populations.php. We intend to periodi-cally update these files to provide more robust values, par-ticularly for the Beef × Dairy and Mexican-origin popula-tions.