A hybrid Penman-Monteith and machine learning model for simulating evapotranspiration and its components

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134985
Han Chen , Stephen Good , Kelly Caylor , Richard P. Fiorella , Lixin Wang
{"title":"A hybrid Penman-Monteith and machine learning model for simulating evapotranspiration and its components","authors":"Han Chen ,&nbsp;Stephen Good ,&nbsp;Kelly Caylor ,&nbsp;Richard P. Fiorella ,&nbsp;Lixin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating physical processes with machine learning has advanced evapotranspiration (<em>ET</em>) simulation, yet most hybrid models fail to partition total <em>ET</em> into its components: soil evaporation (<em>E</em>) and vegetation transpiration (<em>T</em>). This study introduces Residual Neural Network–Penman–Monteith (RNN-PM), a novel hybrid dual-source <em>ET</em> model designed to overcome this limitation. The model synergizes the physically-based Penman–Monteith framework with three specialized residual neural networks trained to estimate key conductance parameters (canopy conductance, soil surface conductance, and aerodynamic conductance). This explicit parameterization allows for the direct partitioning of total <em>ET</em>. Validation at National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) flux sites using high-frequency partitioned <em>E</em> and <em>T</em> shows that RNN-PM reliably reproduces <em>ET</em> and the transpiration fraction (<em>T/ET</em>). For <em>ET</em>, the model achieves an average Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) of 0.89 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.55 mm/day; for <em>T/ET</em>, the KGE is 0.87 with an RMSE of 0.06. Furthermore, RNN-PM demonstrates robust generalization, accurately simulating <em>ET</em> and its components well beyond the initial training dataset, even under extreme climatic conditions. This study extended the analysis by comparing the RNN-PM model with seven established dual-source <em>ET</em> models. The results indicate that RNN-PM outperforms both conventional machine learning models and purely physical process-based models in simulating <em>ET</em> components in most cases. Among the purely physical process-based dual-source models, those based on surface temperature decomposition showed improved performance as the leaf area index (<em>LAI</em>) decreased when evaluated against high-frequency <em>ET</em> component datasets. In contrast, the performance of conductance-based dual-source models declined with decreasing <em>LAI</em>. Although purely machine learning-based models can produce relatively accurate simulations of <em>ET</em> components, they often exhibit limited generalization capability, an issue that the RNN-PM model effectively overcomes. Ultimately, the RNN-PM model represents a significant advance in simulating <em>ET</em> components, offering a novel and scalable approach for improving the representation of land–atmosphere interactions in Earth system models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"668 ","pages":"Article 134985"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942600082X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating physical processes with machine learning has advanced evapotranspiration (ET) simulation, yet most hybrid models fail to partition total ET into its components: soil evaporation (E) and vegetation transpiration (T). This study introduces Residual Neural Network–Penman–Monteith (RNN-PM), a novel hybrid dual-source ET model designed to overcome this limitation. The model synergizes the physically-based Penman–Monteith framework with three specialized residual neural networks trained to estimate key conductance parameters (canopy conductance, soil surface conductance, and aerodynamic conductance). This explicit parameterization allows for the direct partitioning of total ET. Validation at National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) flux sites using high-frequency partitioned E and T shows that RNN-PM reliably reproduces ET and the transpiration fraction (T/ET). For ET, the model achieves an average Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) of 0.89 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.55 mm/day; for T/ET, the KGE is 0.87 with an RMSE of 0.06. Furthermore, RNN-PM demonstrates robust generalization, accurately simulating ET and its components well beyond the initial training dataset, even under extreme climatic conditions. This study extended the analysis by comparing the RNN-PM model with seven established dual-source ET models. The results indicate that RNN-PM outperforms both conventional machine learning models and purely physical process-based models in simulating ET components in most cases. Among the purely physical process-based dual-source models, those based on surface temperature decomposition showed improved performance as the leaf area index (LAI) decreased when evaluated against high-frequency ET component datasets. In contrast, the performance of conductance-based dual-source models declined with decreasing LAI. Although purely machine learning-based models can produce relatively accurate simulations of ET components, they often exhibit limited generalization capability, an issue that the RNN-PM model effectively overcomes. Ultimately, the RNN-PM model represents a significant advance in simulating ET components, offering a novel and scalable approach for improving the representation of land–atmosphere interactions in Earth system models.

Abstract Image

用于模拟蒸散发及其组成部分的混合Penman-Monteith和机器学习模型
将物理过程与机器学习相结合,提高了蒸散发(ET)的模拟水平,但大多数混合模型未能将总蒸散发划分为土壤蒸发(E)和植被蒸腾(T)两部分。本研究引入残差神经网络- penman - monteith (RNN-PM),这是一种新的混合双源ET模型,旨在克服这一限制。该模型将基于物理的Penman-Monteith框架与三个专门的残差神经网络协同起来,用于估计关键的电导参数(冠层电导、土壤表面电导和空气动力电导)。这种显式参数化允许直接划分总ET。在国家生态观测站(NEON)通量站点使用高频划分的E和T进行验证表明,RNN-PM可靠地再现了ET和蒸腾分数(T/ET)。对于ET,模型的平均克林-古普塔效率(KGE)为0.89,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.55 mm/day;T/ET的KGE为0.87,RMSE为0.06。此外,RNN-PM显示了强大的泛化能力,即使在极端气候条件下,也能准确地模拟ET及其组成部分,远远超出初始训练数据集。本研究通过将RNN-PM模型与七个已建立的双源ET模型进行比较,扩展了分析。结果表明,在大多数情况下,RNN-PM在模拟ET组件方面优于传统的机器学习模型和纯粹基于物理过程的模型。在纯物理过程的双源模型中,基于地表温度分解的双源模型的性能随着叶面积指数(LAI)的降低而提高。相比之下,基于电导的双源模型的性能随着LAI的减小而下降。虽然纯粹基于机器学习的模型可以产生相对准确的ET组件模拟,但它们通常表现出有限的泛化能力,这是RNN-PM模型有效克服的问题。最后,RNN-PM模型在模拟ET分量方面取得了重大进展,为改善地球系统模型中陆地-大气相互作用的表征提供了一种新颖且可扩展的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书