Design optimization and development of an explainable multi-objective optimization framework: A-CAES system integrated with advanced thermal energy storage

IF 11.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2026-03-15 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121095
Jie Cui , Xueming Yang , Zhenyu Yang , Weichen Liang , Jianfei Xie
{"title":"Design optimization and development of an explainable multi-objective optimization framework: A-CAES system integrated with advanced thermal energy storage","authors":"Jie Cui ,&nbsp;Xueming Yang ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Yang ,&nbsp;Weichen Liang ,&nbsp;Jianfei Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) system integrated with advanced packed bed latent thermal energy storage (PBLTES) subsystem is of great interest for next generation energy storage technology. However, the integration of A-CAES system with PBLTES subsystems currently faces heat accumulation problems and lacks a comprehensive optimization framework. To overcome the above challenges, the present study presents an indirect design approach for the thermal oil-based cascade PBLTES system integrated with A-CAES system. Based on this approach, we conduct a parametric study on the interaction between the PBLTES system and A-CAES system in terms of operating parameters and structural design. Furthermore, a multi-objective optimization framework is constructed using an explainable hybrid machine learning (ML) model. At last, a systematical comparison with other A-CAES with different configurations PBLTES system is made to evaluate its final economic benefits. Results indicate that no linear relationship exists between most parameters and the round-trip/exergy round-trip efficiency (RTE/ERTE). The SHAP analysis further reveals that the capsule size is the most influential factor while considering the thermodynamic indicator for RTE. Based on the TOPSIS, the optimal results of RTE, the annual CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction (ACER) and total annual costs (TAC) of the new system are 71.62%, 8336 t and 1.13 m$/year. The final profit of the optimal system is 22.24% and 12.69% higher than that of the thermal oil configurations and direct design of PBLTES in A-CAES, respectively. This paper provides reference for different designs and optimizations of A-CAES systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"352 ","pages":"Article 121095"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890426000646","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) system integrated with advanced packed bed latent thermal energy storage (PBLTES) subsystem is of great interest for next generation energy storage technology. However, the integration of A-CAES system with PBLTES subsystems currently faces heat accumulation problems and lacks a comprehensive optimization framework. To overcome the above challenges, the present study presents an indirect design approach for the thermal oil-based cascade PBLTES system integrated with A-CAES system. Based on this approach, we conduct a parametric study on the interaction between the PBLTES system and A-CAES system in terms of operating parameters and structural design. Furthermore, a multi-objective optimization framework is constructed using an explainable hybrid machine learning (ML) model. At last, a systematical comparison with other A-CAES with different configurations PBLTES system is made to evaluate its final economic benefits. Results indicate that no linear relationship exists between most parameters and the round-trip/exergy round-trip efficiency (RTE/ERTE). The SHAP analysis further reveals that the capsule size is the most influential factor while considering the thermodynamic indicator for RTE. Based on the TOPSIS, the optimal results of RTE, the annual CO2 emission reduction (ACER) and total annual costs (TAC) of the new system are 71.62%, 8336 t and 1.13 m$/year. The final profit of the optimal system is 22.24% and 12.69% higher than that of the thermal oil configurations and direct design of PBLTES in A-CAES, respectively. This paper provides reference for different designs and optimizations of A-CAES systems.
一个可解释的多目标优化框架的设计优化与开发:A-CAES系统集成先进的热能储存
绝热压缩空气储能(A-CAES)系统集成了先进的填料床潜热储能(PBLTES)子系统,是下一代储能技术的研究热点。然而,目前a - caes系统与PBLTES子系统的集成存在积热问题,缺乏全面的优化框架。为了克服上述挑战,本研究提出了一种与A-CAES系统集成的导热油基级联PBLTES系统的间接设计方法。基于这种方法,我们从运行参数和结构设计两个方面对PBLTES系统和a - caes系统的相互作用进行了参数化研究。此外,使用可解释的混合机器学习(ML)模型构建了多目标优化框架。最后,与其他a - caes不同配置的PBLTES系统进行了系统比较,评价了其最终的经济效益。结果表明,大多数参数与往返/火用往返效率(RTE/ERTE)之间不存在线性关系。在考虑RTE热力学指标的情况下,SHAP分析进一步揭示了胶囊尺寸是影响RTE的最大因素。基于TOPSIS,新系统的RTE、年CO2减排量(ACER)和年总成本(TAC)的最优结果分别为71.62%、8336 t和113万美元/年。与A-CAES中热油配置和直接设计PBLTES相比,优化后系统的最终收益分别高出22.24%和12.69%。本文为A-CAES系统的不同设计和优化提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书