{"title":"Integrating six feeder modes with the metro system: Insights from on-demand and pooled services","authors":"Linchuan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding travel patterns of feeder modes for metro systems is crucial for addressing first-mile challenges and advancing sustainable urban mobility. Existing research predominantly examines traditional transit modes (e.g., buses) and emerging on-demand transport services (e.g., ride-hailing) separately, with limited comparative analysis between the two. Furthermore, most studies do not distinguish between solo trips and pooled trips, leading to potential misestimation of the impact of each trip type. Drawing on multi-source data from Shenzhen, this study analyzes the access patterns of six feeder modes (i.e., solo ride-hailing, ride-pooling, solo taxis, taxi-pooling, buses, and free-floating bike-sharing) and their integration with the metro system. We employ the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models to evaluate the impacts of these feeder modes on metro ridership, and analyze how on-demand transport services fill gaps in the metro-bus network based on the coverage extension ratio and travel time ratio. Our findings reveal: (1) Solo taxis represent the fastest feeder mode; (2) As access distance increases, the cost advantage of ride-hailing diminishes, while the speed advantage of taxis becomes more pronounced; (3) Ride-pooling contributes to increased metro usage in non-central areas; (4) On-demand transport services can effectively address gaps in the metro-bus network. This study provides policy implications for optimizing transportation resource allocation and enhancing first-mile connectivity for metro systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 104659"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525006817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding travel patterns of feeder modes for metro systems is crucial for addressing first-mile challenges and advancing sustainable urban mobility. Existing research predominantly examines traditional transit modes (e.g., buses) and emerging on-demand transport services (e.g., ride-hailing) separately, with limited comparative analysis between the two. Furthermore, most studies do not distinguish between solo trips and pooled trips, leading to potential misestimation of the impact of each trip type. Drawing on multi-source data from Shenzhen, this study analyzes the access patterns of six feeder modes (i.e., solo ride-hailing, ride-pooling, solo taxis, taxi-pooling, buses, and free-floating bike-sharing) and their integration with the metro system. We employ the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models to evaluate the impacts of these feeder modes on metro ridership, and analyze how on-demand transport services fill gaps in the metro-bus network based on the coverage extension ratio and travel time ratio. Our findings reveal: (1) Solo taxis represent the fastest feeder mode; (2) As access distance increases, the cost advantage of ride-hailing diminishes, while the speed advantage of taxis becomes more pronounced; (3) Ride-pooling contributes to increased metro usage in non-central areas; (4) On-demand transport services can effectively address gaps in the metro-bus network. This study provides policy implications for optimizing transportation resource allocation and enhancing first-mile connectivity for metro systems.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.