Integrating six feeder modes with the metro system: Insights from on-demand and pooled services

IF 9.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Linchuan Yang
{"title":"Integrating six feeder modes with the metro system: Insights from on-demand and pooled services","authors":"Linchuan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding travel patterns of feeder modes for metro systems is crucial for addressing first-mile challenges and advancing sustainable urban mobility. Existing research predominantly examines traditional transit modes (e.g., buses) and emerging on-demand transport services (e.g., ride-hailing) separately, with limited comparative analysis between the two. Furthermore, most studies do not distinguish between solo trips and pooled trips, leading to potential misestimation of the impact of each trip type. Drawing on multi-source data from Shenzhen, this study analyzes the access patterns of six feeder modes (i.e., solo ride-hailing, ride-pooling, solo taxis, taxi-pooling, buses, and free-floating bike-sharing) and their integration with the metro system. We employ the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models to evaluate the impacts of these feeder modes on metro ridership, and analyze how on-demand transport services fill gaps in the metro-bus network based on the coverage extension ratio and travel time ratio. Our findings reveal: (1) Solo taxis represent the fastest feeder mode; (2) As access distance increases, the cost advantage of ride-hailing diminishes, while the speed advantage of taxis becomes more pronounced; (3) Ride-pooling contributes to increased metro usage in non-central areas; (4) On-demand transport services can effectively address gaps in the metro-bus network. This study provides policy implications for optimizing transportation resource allocation and enhancing first-mile connectivity for metro systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 104659"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525006817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding travel patterns of feeder modes for metro systems is crucial for addressing first-mile challenges and advancing sustainable urban mobility. Existing research predominantly examines traditional transit modes (e.g., buses) and emerging on-demand transport services (e.g., ride-hailing) separately, with limited comparative analysis between the two. Furthermore, most studies do not distinguish between solo trips and pooled trips, leading to potential misestimation of the impact of each trip type. Drawing on multi-source data from Shenzhen, this study analyzes the access patterns of six feeder modes (i.e., solo ride-hailing, ride-pooling, solo taxis, taxi-pooling, buses, and free-floating bike-sharing) and their integration with the metro system. We employ the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models to evaluate the impacts of these feeder modes on metro ridership, and analyze how on-demand transport services fill gaps in the metro-bus network based on the coverage extension ratio and travel time ratio. Our findings reveal: (1) Solo taxis represent the fastest feeder mode; (2) As access distance increases, the cost advantage of ride-hailing diminishes, while the speed advantage of taxis becomes more pronounced; (3) Ride-pooling contributes to increased metro usage in non-central areas; (4) On-demand transport services can effectively address gaps in the metro-bus network. This study provides policy implications for optimizing transportation resource allocation and enhancing first-mile connectivity for metro systems.
与地铁系统集成六种馈线模式:从按需和共享服务的见解
了解地铁系统支线模式的出行模式对于解决第一英里挑战和推进可持续城市交通至关重要。现有的研究主要分别考察了传统的交通方式(如公共汽车)和新兴的按需交通服务(如叫车服务),两者之间的比较分析有限。此外,大多数研究没有区分单独旅行和集体旅行,导致对每种旅行类型影响的潜在错误估计。本研究利用深圳的多源数据,分析了六种接驳模式(即单人网约车、拼车、单人出租车、拼车、公交车和自由浮动共享单车)的接入模式及其与地铁系统的融合。本文采用极限梯度增强(XGBoost)和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)模型评估了这些接驳模式对地铁客流量的影响,并基于覆盖延伸比和行程时间比分析了按需运输服务如何填补地铁公交网络的空白。研究结果表明:(1)单人出租车是最快的馈线模式;(2)随着出行距离的增加,网约车的成本优势逐渐减弱,而出租车的速度优势越来越明显;(3)拼车有助于增加非中心地区的地铁使用率;(4)按需交通服务可以有效解决地铁公交网络的缺口。该研究为优化交通资源配置和提高地铁系统第一英里连通性提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书