Zhanbo Sun , Huimin Tang , Baichuan Zhu , Qinxu Li , Xuting Wang , Rui Ma
{"title":"ASB-TDM: Towards flexible and user-friendly transportation demand management in polycentric metropolitan areas","authors":"Zhanbo Sun , Huimin Tang , Baichuan Zhu , Qinxu Li , Xuting Wang , Rui Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a novel, flexible and user-friendly approach, namely, attraction site-based transportation demand management (ASB-TDM) to alleviate road congestion and improve social welfare in trip-making, where both pull and push strategies are imposed on attraction sites in polycentric metropolitan areas. Under the ASB-TDM, attraction sites - as the objects under government regulation - are charged for causing excessive congestion at traffic hotspots or subsidized to attract consumers and balance network traffic. The impacts of ASB-TDM can be partially transferred to the travelers. There is a game between the government, attraction sites and travelers. Government, as the leader, aims to maximize social welfare, while the attraction sites pursue maximizing their own profits, and travelers choose the destination and path accordingly so as to maximize individual trip-making utilities. A tri-level programming model is established to study the game, which is then solved using a meta-heuristic solution approach integrating method of successive algorithm, diagonalization algorithm, and elitism-based genetic algorithm. Experiments were conducted based on a four-node network, the Nguyen-Dupuis network, and the Sioux Falls Network. Numerical results indicate that the oligopolistic competition among attraction sites can lead to improved social welfare and alleviated traffic congestion due to the dispersion effects of attraction sites in polycentric metropolitan areas, as the induced travel demand is diverted to underutilized areas (e.g., subcenters). The ASB-TDM scheme with government participation further enhances these benefits by optimizing the competitive dynamics through strategic subsidies and charges, leading to superior outcomes compared to the pure market-driven approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 104652"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655452500674X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel, flexible and user-friendly approach, namely, attraction site-based transportation demand management (ASB-TDM) to alleviate road congestion and improve social welfare in trip-making, where both pull and push strategies are imposed on attraction sites in polycentric metropolitan areas. Under the ASB-TDM, attraction sites - as the objects under government regulation - are charged for causing excessive congestion at traffic hotspots or subsidized to attract consumers and balance network traffic. The impacts of ASB-TDM can be partially transferred to the travelers. There is a game between the government, attraction sites and travelers. Government, as the leader, aims to maximize social welfare, while the attraction sites pursue maximizing their own profits, and travelers choose the destination and path accordingly so as to maximize individual trip-making utilities. A tri-level programming model is established to study the game, which is then solved using a meta-heuristic solution approach integrating method of successive algorithm, diagonalization algorithm, and elitism-based genetic algorithm. Experiments were conducted based on a four-node network, the Nguyen-Dupuis network, and the Sioux Falls Network. Numerical results indicate that the oligopolistic competition among attraction sites can lead to improved social welfare and alleviated traffic congestion due to the dispersion effects of attraction sites in polycentric metropolitan areas, as the induced travel demand is diverted to underutilized areas (e.g., subcenters). The ASB-TDM scheme with government participation further enhances these benefits by optimizing the competitive dynamics through strategic subsidies and charges, leading to superior outcomes compared to the pure market-driven approach.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.