Environmental regulation and green innovation: The moderating roles of green finance and executive green perception

IF 15.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2026.100954
Lujia Ma, Shuaihe Zhuo
{"title":"Environmental regulation and green innovation: The moderating roles of green finance and executive green perception","authors":"Lujia Ma,&nbsp;Shuaihe Zhuo","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2026.100954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid escalating global climate pressures and environmental degradation, the pursuit of sustainable development has intensified scholarly interest in the link between environmental regulation and green technological innovation. This study offers a comprehensive examination of how environmental regulation shapes green technological innovation, with specific emphasis on the moderating effects of green finance and executive green perception. Using a double fixed-effects model and panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023, we find that environmental regulation significantly promotes green technological innovation. Baseline regressions show that a one-unit increase in regulatory stringency corresponds to an approximately 27.4% increase in green patent output. Green finance operates as an important catalyst by reducing the risks and costs inherent in green R&amp;D, while executive green perception aligns corporate decision-making with sustainable innovation objectives. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that regulatory impacts vary substantially across industries, regions, and firm life-cycle stages, underscoring the need for differentiated policy design. Key transmission channels—including the easing of financial constraints and the enhancement of corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance—further support green innovation indirectly. These findings provide actionable insights for optimizing environmental regulation, strengthening green finance, and enhancing executive green perception to advance sustainable development and accelerate the transition to a green economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100954"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X26000181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amid escalating global climate pressures and environmental degradation, the pursuit of sustainable development has intensified scholarly interest in the link between environmental regulation and green technological innovation. This study offers a comprehensive examination of how environmental regulation shapes green technological innovation, with specific emphasis on the moderating effects of green finance and executive green perception. Using a double fixed-effects model and panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023, we find that environmental regulation significantly promotes green technological innovation. Baseline regressions show that a one-unit increase in regulatory stringency corresponds to an approximately 27.4% increase in green patent output. Green finance operates as an important catalyst by reducing the risks and costs inherent in green R&D, while executive green perception aligns corporate decision-making with sustainable innovation objectives. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that regulatory impacts vary substantially across industries, regions, and firm life-cycle stages, underscoring the need for differentiated policy design. Key transmission channels—including the easing of financial constraints and the enhancement of corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance—further support green innovation indirectly. These findings provide actionable insights for optimizing environmental regulation, strengthening green finance, and enhancing executive green perception to advance sustainable development and accelerate the transition to a green economy.
环境规制与绿色创新:绿色金融与高管绿色感知的调节作用
在全球气候压力和环境恶化加剧的背景下,对可持续发展的追求增强了学术界对环境监管与绿色技术创新之间联系的兴趣。本研究全面考察了环境监管如何影响绿色技术创新,特别强调了绿色金融和高管绿色感知的调节作用。利用双固定效应模型和2010 - 2023年中国a股上市公司的面板数据,我们发现环境监管显著促进了绿色技术创新。基线回归表明,监管严格程度每提高一个单位,绿色专利产出就会增加约27.4%。绿色金融通过降低绿色研发固有的风险和成本而发挥重要的催化剂作用,而高管的绿色感知使企业决策与可持续创新目标保持一致。异质性分析显示,不同行业、地区和企业生命周期阶段的监管影响差异很大,这凸显了差异化政策设计的必要性。关键的传导渠道——包括金融约束的放松和企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效的提高——进一步间接支持了绿色创新。这些研究结果为优化环境监管、加强绿色金融、提高高管绿色意识以促进可持续发展和加速向绿色经济转型提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书