Long-term outcomes of cochlear implants in patients over 65: Hearing thresholds remain stable, but speech perception declines with age

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Auris Nasus Larynx Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2026.01.003
Kanako Kondo , Hiroshi Yamazaki , Kayoko Mizuno , Seiko Kawae , Namie Iguchi , Naoe Mori , Yosuke Tona , Ken Kojima , Norio Yamamoto , Juichi Ito , Koichi Omori
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of cochlear implants in patients over 65: Hearing thresholds remain stable, but speech perception declines with age","authors":"Kanako Kondo ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yamazaki ,&nbsp;Kayoko Mizuno ,&nbsp;Seiko Kawae ,&nbsp;Namie Iguchi ,&nbsp;Naoe Mori ,&nbsp;Yosuke Tona ,&nbsp;Ken Kojima ,&nbsp;Norio Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Juichi Ito ,&nbsp;Koichi Omori","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate long-term cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in elderly patients aged ≥65 years, with a particular focus on the impact of implantation age and chronological age at testing on auditory performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective study of 53 postlingually deafened adults aged ≥65 years at the time of outcome evaluation who underwent unilateral CI at our institute between 1987 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at implantation: the Younger-elderly group (&lt;75 years; <em>n</em> = 36) and the Older-elderly group (≥75 years; <em>n</em> = 17). Postoperative aided thresholds and monosyllabic speech discrimination scores in quiet were collected annually up to 10 years postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CI-aided thresholds remained stable over 10 years after implantation and did not differ between groups (<em>p</em> = 0.40). In contrast, speech discrimination scores were significantly poorer in the Older-elderly group compared with the Younger-elderly group (<em>p</em> = 0.020). Regression analyses confirmed that chronological age at testing, but not age at implantation, was a significant predictor of speech outcomes (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Notably, patients aged ≥80 years exhibited mean CI-aided speech discrimination below 50 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CI effectively restored hearing thresholds in elderly patients, independent of implantation age. However, speech perception declined progressively with advancing test age, particularly in those ≥80 years, suggesting that central auditory and cognitive aging are the primary constraints on long-term outcomes. Candidacy criteria should therefore be applied cautiously in this age group, with thorough preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 174-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814626000027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate long-term cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in elderly patients aged ≥65 years, with a particular focus on the impact of implantation age and chronological age at testing on auditory performance.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 53 postlingually deafened adults aged ≥65 years at the time of outcome evaluation who underwent unilateral CI at our institute between 1987 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at implantation: the Younger-elderly group (<75 years; n = 36) and the Older-elderly group (≥75 years; n = 17). Postoperative aided thresholds and monosyllabic speech discrimination scores in quiet were collected annually up to 10 years postoperatively.

Results

CI-aided thresholds remained stable over 10 years after implantation and did not differ between groups (p = 0.40). In contrast, speech discrimination scores were significantly poorer in the Older-elderly group compared with the Younger-elderly group (p = 0.020). Regression analyses confirmed that chronological age at testing, but not age at implantation, was a significant predictor of speech outcomes (p < 0.0001). Notably, patients aged ≥80 years exhibited mean CI-aided speech discrimination below 50 %.

Conclusions

CI effectively restored hearing thresholds in elderly patients, independent of implantation age. However, speech perception declined progressively with advancing test age, particularly in those ≥80 years, suggesting that central auditory and cognitive aging are the primary constraints on long-term outcomes. Candidacy criteria should therefore be applied cautiously in this age group, with thorough preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations.
65岁以上患者人工耳蜗植入的长期结果:听力阈值保持稳定,但语言感知随着年龄的增长而下降。
目的:本研究旨在评估≥65岁老年患者的长期人工耳蜗植入(CI)结果,特别关注植入年龄和实足年龄对听力表现的影响。方法:我们对53名在结果评估时年龄≥65岁的语后失聪成人进行了回顾性研究,这些成年人在1987年至2019年期间在我们研究所接受了单侧CI。根据种植年龄将患者分为两组:青年-老年组(结果:种植后10年ci辅助阈值保持稳定,组间无差异(p = 0.40)。相比之下,老年组的言语辨别得分明显低于老年组(p = 0.020)。回归分析证实,测试时的实足年龄,而不是植入时的年龄,是言语结局的显著预测因子(p < 0.0001)。值得注意的是,年龄≥80岁的患者表现出的ci辅助言语歧视平均低于50%。结论:CI可有效恢复老年患者的听力阈值,与植入年龄无关。然而,随着测试年龄的增长,言语感知能力逐渐下降,特别是在≥80岁的测试年龄中,这表明中枢听觉和认知衰老是长期结果的主要制约因素。因此,候选标准应谨慎地应用于这个年龄组,与彻底的术前咨询,以建立现实的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Auris Nasus Larynx
Auris Nasus Larynx 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science. Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed. Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书