Kanako Kondo , Hiroshi Yamazaki , Kayoko Mizuno , Seiko Kawae , Namie Iguchi , Naoe Mori , Yosuke Tona , Ken Kojima , Norio Yamamoto , Juichi Ito , Koichi Omori
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of cochlear implants in patients over 65: Hearing thresholds remain stable, but speech perception declines with age","authors":"Kanako Kondo , Hiroshi Yamazaki , Kayoko Mizuno , Seiko Kawae , Namie Iguchi , Naoe Mori , Yosuke Tona , Ken Kojima , Norio Yamamoto , Juichi Ito , Koichi Omori","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate long-term cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in elderly patients aged ≥65 years, with a particular focus on the impact of implantation age and chronological age at testing on auditory performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective study of 53 postlingually deafened adults aged ≥65 years at the time of outcome evaluation who underwent unilateral CI at our institute between 1987 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at implantation: the Younger-elderly group (<75 years; <em>n</em> = 36) and the Older-elderly group (≥75 years; <em>n</em> = 17). Postoperative aided thresholds and monosyllabic speech discrimination scores in quiet were collected annually up to 10 years postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CI-aided thresholds remained stable over 10 years after implantation and did not differ between groups (<em>p</em> = 0.40). In contrast, speech discrimination scores were significantly poorer in the Older-elderly group compared with the Younger-elderly group (<em>p</em> = 0.020). Regression analyses confirmed that chronological age at testing, but not age at implantation, was a significant predictor of speech outcomes (<em>p</em> < 0.0001). Notably, patients aged ≥80 years exhibited mean CI-aided speech discrimination below 50 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CI effectively restored hearing thresholds in elderly patients, independent of implantation age. However, speech perception declined progressively with advancing test age, particularly in those ≥80 years, suggesting that central auditory and cognitive aging are the primary constraints on long-term outcomes. Candidacy criteria should therefore be applied cautiously in this age group, with thorough preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 174-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814626000027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate long-term cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in elderly patients aged ≥65 years, with a particular focus on the impact of implantation age and chronological age at testing on auditory performance.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of 53 postlingually deafened adults aged ≥65 years at the time of outcome evaluation who underwent unilateral CI at our institute between 1987 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at implantation: the Younger-elderly group (<75 years; n = 36) and the Older-elderly group (≥75 years; n = 17). Postoperative aided thresholds and monosyllabic speech discrimination scores in quiet were collected annually up to 10 years postoperatively.
Results
CI-aided thresholds remained stable over 10 years after implantation and did not differ between groups (p = 0.40). In contrast, speech discrimination scores were significantly poorer in the Older-elderly group compared with the Younger-elderly group (p = 0.020). Regression analyses confirmed that chronological age at testing, but not age at implantation, was a significant predictor of speech outcomes (p < 0.0001). Notably, patients aged ≥80 years exhibited mean CI-aided speech discrimination below 50 %.
Conclusions
CI effectively restored hearing thresholds in elderly patients, independent of implantation age. However, speech perception declined progressively with advancing test age, particularly in those ≥80 years, suggesting that central auditory and cognitive aging are the primary constraints on long-term outcomes. Candidacy criteria should therefore be applied cautiously in this age group, with thorough preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations.
期刊介绍:
The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science.
Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed.
Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.