{"title":"Distance-related changes in gait parameters during uneven-surface walking in people with stroke versus healthy controls: A cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Yasuhiro Inui , Naomichi Mizuta , Yuta Terasawa , Tomoya Tanaka , Naruhito Hasui , Kazuki Hayashida , Yuki Nishi , Shu Morioka","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>People with Stroke (PwS) struggle with walking outdoors, especially on uneven surfaces, which limits their social participation. Distance-related changes on uneven surfaces remain unclear. We compared these changes between PwS and healthy controls (HC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nineteen PwS and 19 HC walked four laps on a 10-m uneven surface. Gait speed, root mean square of trunk acceleration (stability), maximum joint angles, electromyography (EMG) amplitude, and instantaneous mean frequency (IMNF) were measured. Linear mixed models were used to compare gait-parameter changes across laps.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>No group × lap interaction was detected for gait speed, stability, stance-phase hip extension, or swing-phase knee flexion. An interaction was observed for ankle dorsiflexion during initial contact (<em>p</em> = 0.036; decreased across laps in PwS). For EMG amplitude, tibialis anterior during initial contact showed an interaction (<em>p</em> = 0.036; increased only in HC). Regarding IMNF, gluteus medius showed a group main effect during mid-stance (<em>p</em> < 0.001; higher in PwS) and an interaction during terminal stance (p = 0.036; decreased only in PwS); during mid-swing, group main effects were observed for rectus femoris (<em>p</em> = 0.044), biceps femoris (<em>p</em> = 0.011), and gluteus medius (<em>p</em> = 0.023), with higher IMNF in PwS.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>PwS maintained gait speed and stability, increasing distances on uneven surfaces, showing adaptations comparable to HC. PwS did not sufficiently augment tibialis anterior amplitude, accompanied by reduced ankle dorsiflexion and limited shock absorption. Elevated IMNF indicates greater motor-unit recruitment contributing to the maintenance of joint angles, whereas gluteus medius IMNF declined during terminal stance, suggesting fatigue. Overall, adaptation was present but limited, with a risk of fatigue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 106747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003326000021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
People with Stroke (PwS) struggle with walking outdoors, especially on uneven surfaces, which limits their social participation. Distance-related changes on uneven surfaces remain unclear. We compared these changes between PwS and healthy controls (HC).
Methods
Nineteen PwS and 19 HC walked four laps on a 10-m uneven surface. Gait speed, root mean square of trunk acceleration (stability), maximum joint angles, electromyography (EMG) amplitude, and instantaneous mean frequency (IMNF) were measured. Linear mixed models were used to compare gait-parameter changes across laps.
Findings
No group × lap interaction was detected for gait speed, stability, stance-phase hip extension, or swing-phase knee flexion. An interaction was observed for ankle dorsiflexion during initial contact (p = 0.036; decreased across laps in PwS). For EMG amplitude, tibialis anterior during initial contact showed an interaction (p = 0.036; increased only in HC). Regarding IMNF, gluteus medius showed a group main effect during mid-stance (p < 0.001; higher in PwS) and an interaction during terminal stance (p = 0.036; decreased only in PwS); during mid-swing, group main effects were observed for rectus femoris (p = 0.044), biceps femoris (p = 0.011), and gluteus medius (p = 0.023), with higher IMNF in PwS.
Interpretation
PwS maintained gait speed and stability, increasing distances on uneven surfaces, showing adaptations comparable to HC. PwS did not sufficiently augment tibialis anterior amplitude, accompanied by reduced ankle dorsiflexion and limited shock absorption. Elevated IMNF indicates greater motor-unit recruitment contributing to the maintenance of joint angles, whereas gluteus medius IMNF declined during terminal stance, suggesting fatigue. Overall, adaptation was present but limited, with a risk of fatigue.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.