A Streamlined 4-item Wolf Motor Function Test for Efficient Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.

IF 3.7
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI:10.1177/15459683251412278
Bokkyu Kim, Nicolas Schweighofer, Steven L Wolf, Carolee Winstein
{"title":"A Streamlined 4-item Wolf Motor Function Test for Efficient Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.","authors":"Bokkyu Kim, Nicolas Schweighofer, Steven L Wolf, Carolee Winstein","doi":"10.1177/15459683251412278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a well-recognized measure for assessing upper extremity motor function in stroke rehabilitation. However, prolonged administration time limits the WMFT in clinical use.ObjectiveThis study aimed to reduce the number of WMFT tasks using machine learning and explore its measurement structure and psychometric properties, using data from 3 stroke rehabilitation trials that together engaged 543 participants with a wide range of motor impairment during subacute and chronic recovery phases.MethodsWMFT performance time data were converted to rates and outliers were eliminated using multivariate normality tests. Random forest regression with the elbow method was employed to determine the optimal number of items in the WMFT. Further, a machine learning technique with cross-validation and bootstrapping was used to select items. We used confirmatory factor analysis to determine the measurement structure of the original and shortened version of WMFT. Psychometric properties of the shortened version were also assessed.ResultsMachine learning-based item reduction identified 4 items (Hand to Table, Hand to Box, Extend Elbow Without Weight, and Lift Can) as representative tasks. Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor structure for both original and shorten versions, comprising non-manipulative/transport and manipulative/dexterity factors. WMFT-4 showed strong convergent validity with WMFT-15 (R = 0.98, <i>P</i> < .001) and moderate cross-domain validity with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (R = 0.523, <i>P</i> < .001), comparable to the original WMFT-15 (R = 0.526, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionThe streamlined WMFT-4 enhances the feasibility of the WMFT for both clinical and research settings while maintaining its original measurement characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"214-225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251412278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a well-recognized measure for assessing upper extremity motor function in stroke rehabilitation. However, prolonged administration time limits the WMFT in clinical use.ObjectiveThis study aimed to reduce the number of WMFT tasks using machine learning and explore its measurement structure and psychometric properties, using data from 3 stroke rehabilitation trials that together engaged 543 participants with a wide range of motor impairment during subacute and chronic recovery phases.MethodsWMFT performance time data were converted to rates and outliers were eliminated using multivariate normality tests. Random forest regression with the elbow method was employed to determine the optimal number of items in the WMFT. Further, a machine learning technique with cross-validation and bootstrapping was used to select items. We used confirmatory factor analysis to determine the measurement structure of the original and shortened version of WMFT. Psychometric properties of the shortened version were also assessed.ResultsMachine learning-based item reduction identified 4 items (Hand to Table, Hand to Box, Extend Elbow Without Weight, and Lift Can) as representative tasks. Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor structure for both original and shorten versions, comprising non-manipulative/transport and manipulative/dexterity factors. WMFT-4 showed strong convergent validity with WMFT-15 (R = 0.98, P < .001) and moderate cross-domain validity with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (R = 0.523, P < .001), comparable to the original WMFT-15 (R = 0.526, P < .001).ConclusionThe streamlined WMFT-4 enhances the feasibility of the WMFT for both clinical and research settings while maintaining its original measurement characteristics.

一项简化的4项Wolf运动功能测试用于有效评估慢性脑卒中幸存者上肢运动功能。
Wolf运动功能测试(WMFT)是一种公认的评估中风康复患者上肢运动功能的方法。然而,较长的给药时间限制了WMFT的临床应用。本研究旨在利用机器学习减少WMFT任务的数量,并探索其测量结构和心理测量特性,研究数据来自3个卒中康复试验,共涉及543名亚急性和慢性恢复期运动障碍的参与者。方法将swmft性能时间数据转换为率,并采用多变量正态性检验剔除异常值。采用肘形法随机森林回归确定WMFT的最优项目数。此外,使用交叉验证和自举的机器学习技术来选择项目。我们使用验证性因子分析来确定原始版和缩短版WMFT的测量结构。缩短版本的心理测量特性也进行了评估。结果基于机器学习的项目减少识别出4个具有代表性的任务(手到桌子、手到盒子、无重量伸展肘部和举罐)。因子分析结果显示,原始版本和缩短版本均呈现双因子结构,包括非操纵性/移动性因子和操纵性/灵巧性因子。WMFT-4与WMFT-15具有较强的收敛效度(R = 0.98, P P P P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书