Usefulness of the minimally invasive flow reversal method in carotid artery stenting: Simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR).

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tomomichi Kayahara, Natsuki Shozuhara, Kazuki Fukumoto, Shunsuke Kido, Eisuke Tsukagoshi, Takashi Matsumoto, Toru Nakagami, Masataka Yoshimura, Shinya Kohyama
{"title":"Usefulness of the minimally invasive flow reversal method in carotid artery stenting: Simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR).","authors":"Tomomichi Kayahara, Natsuki Shozuhara, Kazuki Fukumoto, Shunsuke Kido, Eisuke Tsukagoshi, Takashi Matsumoto, Toru Nakagami, Masataka Yoshimura, Shinya Kohyama","doi":"10.1177/15910199261416272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundFlow reversal, achieved by occluding both the common and external carotid arteries to induce retrograde flow from the internal carotid artery, is a useful method for preventing distal embolization in cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The \"conventional method\" employed by our institute for CAS involves the use of one-way valves incorporated in a flow reversal system for rapid manual blood aspiration. Subsequently, we recently transitioned from the conventional method to the \"simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR),\" in which external carotid artery occlusion is omitted while a transradial approach is implemented. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of SF-CARR in patients undergoing CAS.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 50 patients diagnosed with internal carotid artery stenosis between 2022 and 2025. Of these, 24 were treated with SF-CARR, while the others underwent the conventional method. We investigated patient characteristics, endovascular procedures, procedural invasiveness, including procedural time, radiation exposure, or contrast agent use, and clinical outcomes.ResultsCompared to the conventional group, a reduced procedural time (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was observed in the SF-CARR group. The radiation exposure dose (<i>p</i> = 0.020), fluoroscopy time (<i>p</i> = 0.003), amount of contrast agent injected (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and number of contrast agent injections (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were also reduced in the SF-CARR group. In addition, the transradial approach was adopted more frequently in the SF-CARR group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and no significant differences were reported in complications or patients' outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionThis novel flow reversal method, \"SF-CARR,\" can provide minimally invasive treatment to patients with carotid artery stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199261416272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199261416272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundFlow reversal, achieved by occluding both the common and external carotid arteries to induce retrograde flow from the internal carotid artery, is a useful method for preventing distal embolization in cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The "conventional method" employed by our institute for CAS involves the use of one-way valves incorporated in a flow reversal system for rapid manual blood aspiration. Subsequently, we recently transitioned from the conventional method to the "simplified flow reversal carotid artery revascularization for radial access (SF-CARR)," in which external carotid artery occlusion is omitted while a transradial approach is implemented. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of SF-CARR in patients undergoing CAS.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 50 patients diagnosed with internal carotid artery stenosis between 2022 and 2025. Of these, 24 were treated with SF-CARR, while the others underwent the conventional method. We investigated patient characteristics, endovascular procedures, procedural invasiveness, including procedural time, radiation exposure, or contrast agent use, and clinical outcomes.ResultsCompared to the conventional group, a reduced procedural time (p = 0.001) was observed in the SF-CARR group. The radiation exposure dose (p = 0.020), fluoroscopy time (p = 0.003), amount of contrast agent injected (p < 0.001), and number of contrast agent injections (p < 0.001) were also reduced in the SF-CARR group. In addition, the transradial approach was adopted more frequently in the SF-CARR group (p < 0.001), and no significant differences were reported in complications or patients' outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionThis novel flow reversal method, "SF-CARR," can provide minimally invasive treatment to patients with carotid artery stenosis.

微创血流逆转法在颈动脉支架植入术中的实用性:简化桡动脉通路血流逆转颈动脉重建术(SF-CARR)。
通过阻塞颈总动脉和颈外动脉诱导颈内动脉逆行血流来实现血流逆转,是颈动脉支架置入(CAS)时防止远端栓塞的有效方法。我们研究所用于CAS的“常规方法”包括使用单向阀,该单向阀与流量反转系统相结合,用于快速手动吸血。随后,我们最近从传统方法过渡到“简化血流逆转颈动脉桡动脉重建术(SF-CARR)”,其中在实施经桡动脉入路时省略了颈外动脉闭塞。本研究旨在阐明SF-CARR在CAS患者中的疗效和安全性。方法对2022 ~ 2025年间诊断为颈内动脉狭窄的50例患者进行回顾性研究。其中24例采用SF-CARR治疗,其余患者采用常规方法。我们调查了患者特征、血管内手术、手术侵入性(包括手术时间、辐射暴露或造影剂使用)和临床结果。结果与常规组相比,SF-CARR组手术时间缩短(p = 0.001)。放射照射剂量(p = 0.020)、透视时间(p = 0.003)、注射造影剂量(p = 0.003)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书