“That'll be the end of the encampment, but they'll still be here”: A thematic analysis of climate-housing narratives

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Zachary Van Tol, Bea Ahbeck, Kristin M. Ferguson
{"title":"“That'll be the end of the encampment, but they'll still be here”: A thematic analysis of climate-housing narratives","authors":"Zachary Van Tol,&nbsp;Bea Ahbeck,&nbsp;Kristin M. Ferguson","doi":"10.1111/asap.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the convergence of homelessness and environmental hazards within public discourse sources, focusing on three questions: How did public discourse sources differ in their portrayal of clearing the Zone, a contentious downtown Phoenix encampment? To what extent did Phoenix's Safe Outdoor Space feature in local public discourse sources’ coverage of homelessness? How was exposure to environmental hazards addressed in public discourse narratives surrounding homelessness during the clearing of the Zone and creation of the SOS? We employed social constructionism and thematic analysis to identify and interpret themes within public discourse sources (<i>n</i> = 111 records) from January 1 to December 31, 2023. When feasible, we incorporated content analysis to quantify distinct themes. We identified three themes related to clearing the Zone: <i>Blame</i>, <i>Support for the city</i>, and <i>Skepticism of the city</i>, as well as three themes around creating the SOS: <i>Support for the city, Skepticism of the city</i>, and <i>Alternative solutions</i>. For environmental hazards, we identified one theme: <i>Environmental concerns</i>. Our analysis suggests the need for a three-pronged strategy: year-round protection from environmental exposures, elevating the voices of those with lived experience, and expanding investments in housing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the convergence of homelessness and environmental hazards within public discourse sources, focusing on three questions: How did public discourse sources differ in their portrayal of clearing the Zone, a contentious downtown Phoenix encampment? To what extent did Phoenix's Safe Outdoor Space feature in local public discourse sources’ coverage of homelessness? How was exposure to environmental hazards addressed in public discourse narratives surrounding homelessness during the clearing of the Zone and creation of the SOS? We employed social constructionism and thematic analysis to identify and interpret themes within public discourse sources (n = 111 records) from January 1 to December 31, 2023. When feasible, we incorporated content analysis to quantify distinct themes. We identified three themes related to clearing the Zone: Blame, Support for the city, and Skepticism of the city, as well as three themes around creating the SOS: Support for the city, Skepticism of the city, and Alternative solutions. For environmental hazards, we identified one theme: Environmental concerns. Our analysis suggests the need for a three-pronged strategy: year-round protection from environmental exposures, elevating the voices of those with lived experience, and expanding investments in housing.

“这将是营地的终结,但他们还会在这里”:对气候住房叙事的主题分析
本研究探讨了公共话语来源中无家可归和环境危害的趋同,重点关注三个问题:公共话语来源对清理凤凰城市中心有争议的营地的描述有何不同?凤凰城的安全户外空间在当地公共话语来源对无家可归者的报道中起到了多大的作用?在清理隔离区和创建SOS期间,围绕无家可归的公共话语叙述如何处理暴露于环境危害的问题?我们采用社会建构主义和主题分析来识别和解释2023年1月1日至12月31日期间公共话语来源(n = 111条记录)中的主题。在可行的情况下,我们结合内容分析来量化不同的主题。我们确定了与清理区域相关的三个主题:指责、支持城市和怀疑城市,以及围绕创建SOS的三个主题:支持城市、怀疑城市和替代解决方案。对于环境危害,我们确定了一个主题:环境问题。我们的分析表明,需要一个三管齐下的策略:全年保护免受环境影响,提高有生活经验的人的发言权,扩大住房投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书