Factors related to immunization uptake among the hill tribe and stateless children in northern Thailand: A mixed methods study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccine Pub Date : 2026-03-07 Epub Date: 2026-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128254
Tawatchai Apidechkul , Mary C. Smith Fawzi , Kim Alyson Wilson
{"title":"Factors related to immunization uptake among the hill tribe and stateless children in northern Thailand: A mixed methods study","authors":"Tawatchai Apidechkul ,&nbsp;Mary C. Smith Fawzi ,&nbsp;Kim Alyson Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Immunization is a significant health care tool to protect against crisis-related threats to human health, particularly in underserved populations such as hill tribes and stateless people in Thailand. A mixed method aimed to identify the barriers to and facilitators of the use of vaccines among five-year-old hill tribe and stateless children living in the border areas of northern Thailand and Myanmar. Logistic regression was used to detect associations in the quantitative data, and content analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. A total of 188 cases and 188 controls were analyzed; 54.0 % were boys, and 54.3 % were from the Akha tribe. Children without a birth certificate (AOR = 8.57), children who received a vaccine at a provincial/district hospital (AOR = 14.76), private hospital or clinic (AOR = 7.29), children living with ≥3 other children aged 6–12 years (AOR = 3.61), children living with mothers who were non-Thai citizens (AOR = 4.40), children living with mothers who had not attended school (AOR = 4.08), children living with a primary caregiver who was Yao (AOR = 4.58) or Lisu (AOR = 2.94), children living with a Christian or Muslim primary caregiver (AOR = 2.76), and children living with elderly individuals who brought them for vaccinations (AOR = 2.30) had greater odds of having incomplete vaccination than children with the opposite characteristics. Communication challenges, different perspectives on vaccines among different generations, stages of citizenship, mobility, disasters, and a lack of effective health policies were detected as barriers to vaccination. While seeking a new life for younger generations was a facilitator for vaccination. A public health policy for vaccine services without a Thai citizenship requirement should be implemented to increase coverage for hill tribe and stateless children living in the border areas of Thailand and Myanmar.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X26000617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunization is a significant health care tool to protect against crisis-related threats to human health, particularly in underserved populations such as hill tribes and stateless people in Thailand. A mixed method aimed to identify the barriers to and facilitators of the use of vaccines among five-year-old hill tribe and stateless children living in the border areas of northern Thailand and Myanmar. Logistic regression was used to detect associations in the quantitative data, and content analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. A total of 188 cases and 188 controls were analyzed; 54.0 % were boys, and 54.3 % were from the Akha tribe. Children without a birth certificate (AOR = 8.57), children who received a vaccine at a provincial/district hospital (AOR = 14.76), private hospital or clinic (AOR = 7.29), children living with ≥3 other children aged 6–12 years (AOR = 3.61), children living with mothers who were non-Thai citizens (AOR = 4.40), children living with mothers who had not attended school (AOR = 4.08), children living with a primary caregiver who was Yao (AOR = 4.58) or Lisu (AOR = 2.94), children living with a Christian or Muslim primary caregiver (AOR = 2.76), and children living with elderly individuals who brought them for vaccinations (AOR = 2.30) had greater odds of having incomplete vaccination than children with the opposite characteristics. Communication challenges, different perspectives on vaccines among different generations, stages of citizenship, mobility, disasters, and a lack of effective health policies were detected as barriers to vaccination. While seeking a new life for younger generations was a facilitator for vaccination. A public health policy for vaccine services without a Thai citizenship requirement should be implemented to increase coverage for hill tribe and stateless children living in the border areas of Thailand and Myanmar.
泰国北部山区部落和无国籍儿童免疫接种相关因素:一项混合方法研究。
免疫接种是一项重要的卫生保健工具,可防范与危机有关的对人类健康的威胁,特别是在泰国山区部落和无国籍人等得不到充分服务的人群中。一种混合方法,旨在查明生活在泰国和缅甸北部边境地区的五岁山地部落和无国籍儿童使用疫苗的障碍和促进因素。定量数据采用Logistic回归检测关联,定性数据采用内容分析。共分析188例病例和188例对照;54.0%为男孩,54.3%来自Akha部落。孩子没有出生证明(优势比= 8.57),孩子们收到了疫苗在一个省/地区医院(AOR = 14.76),私人医院或诊所(AOR = 7.29),儿童生活与其他≥3 6 - 12岁儿童(AOR = 3.61),孩子生活在母亲non-Thai公民(优势比= 4.40),孩子生活在母亲没有参加学校(优势比= 4.08),孩子们生活在一个主要照顾者谁是姚明(优势比= 4.58)或傈僳族(AOR = 2.94),与具有相反特征的儿童相比,与基督教或穆斯林主要照顾者生活在一起的儿童(AOR = 2.76)和与带他们接种疫苗的老年人生活在一起的儿童(AOR = 2.30)接种不完全疫苗的几率更大。沟通困难、不同世代对疫苗的不同看法、公民身份的不同阶段、流动性、灾害以及缺乏有效的卫生政策被认为是疫苗接种的障碍。在为年轻一代寻求新生活的同时,他也是疫苗接种的推动者。应实施不要求泰国公民身份的疫苗服务公共卫生政策,以扩大对居住在泰国和缅甸边境地区的山地部落和无国籍儿童的覆盖范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书