A Systematic Review of the Specific Role of Biological Therapies in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease.

IF 6.6 3区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Milagros Lázaro-Sastre, Esther Moreno-Rodilla, Cristina Martín-García, Juan Maza-Solano, María Gil-Melcon, Ignacio Dávila
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Specific Role of Biological Therapies in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease.","authors":"Milagros Lázaro-Sastre, Esther Moreno-Rodilla, Cristina Martín-García, Juan Maza-Solano, María Gil-Melcon, Ignacio Dávila","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Although high-dose aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) and surgery are effective, adverse effects and high dropout rates limit its use. The emergence of biologics for asthma and/or CRSwNP entails rethinking the management of AERD. There is no consensus on choosing between ATAD and biologics. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on the role of biologics in the management of AERD, focusing on their potential to induce NSAID tolerance and proposing a management algorithm. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to March 2025. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, excluding editorials, reviews, case reports, guidelines, and publications not in English. Data were extracted from clinical trials, real-world studies, and retrospective analyses. The various inflammatory pathways targeted by biologics included immunoglobulin E (omalizumab), subunit alpha of the interleukin 4 receptor (IL-4Ra) (dupilumab), IL-5/IL-5Ra (mepolizumab, benralizumab), and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (tezepelumab). These drugs have demonstrated efficacy in improving asthma and CRSwNP in AERD. The most consistent evidence seems to favor omalizumab and dupilumab for enhancing tolerance to NSAIDs. Although evidence remains inconclusive, the combination of ATAD and biologics may offer additive benefits in selected patients. Biologics represent a promising alternative in the management of AERD, particularly for patients with poor tolerance to aspirin. Further prospective, controlled studies are needed to define optimal treatment algorithms and identify biomarkers predictive of therapeutic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"12-24"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Although high-dose aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) and surgery are effective, adverse effects and high dropout rates limit its use. The emergence of biologics for asthma and/or CRSwNP entails rethinking the management of AERD. There is no consensus on choosing between ATAD and biologics. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on the role of biologics in the management of AERD, focusing on their potential to induce NSAID tolerance and proposing a management algorithm. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to March 2025. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, excluding editorials, reviews, case reports, guidelines, and publications not in English. Data were extracted from clinical trials, real-world studies, and retrospective analyses. The various inflammatory pathways targeted by biologics included immunoglobulin E (omalizumab), subunit alpha of the interleukin 4 receptor (IL-4Ra) (dupilumab), IL-5/IL-5Ra (mepolizumab, benralizumab), and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (tezepelumab). These drugs have demonstrated efficacy in improving asthma and CRSwNP in AERD. The most consistent evidence seems to favor omalizumab and dupilumab for enhancing tolerance to NSAIDs. Although evidence remains inconclusive, the combination of ATAD and biologics may offer additive benefits in selected patients. Biologics represent a promising alternative in the management of AERD, particularly for patients with poor tolerance to aspirin. Further prospective, controlled studies are needed to define optimal treatment algorithms and identify biomarkers predictive of therapeutic response.

生物治疗在阿司匹林加重呼吸系统疾病中的特殊作用的系统综述。
阿司匹林加重呼吸系统疾病(AERD)的特征是慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)、哮喘和对非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的超敏反应。尽管脱敏(ATAD)和手术后的大剂量阿司匹林治疗是有效的,但不良反应和高辍学率限制了它的使用。哮喘和/或CRSwNP生物制剂的出现需要重新思考AERD的管理。在ATAD和生物制剂之间的选择还没有达成共识。本系统综述评估了生物制剂在AERD治疗中作用的现有证据,重点关注其诱导非甾体抗炎药耐受性的潜力,并提出了一种管理算法。在PubMed, Embase和Scopus中进行了系统的文献检索,直到2025年3月。根据预先确定的标准选择研究,不包括社论、综述、病例报告、指南和非英文出版物。数据来自临床试验、真实世界研究和回顾性分析。生物制剂靶向的各种炎症途径包括免疫球蛋白E (omalizumab),白细胞介素4受体(IL-4Ra)亚单位α (dupilumab), IL-5/IL-5Ra (mepolizumab, benralizumab)和胸腺基质淋巴生成素(tezepelumab)。这些药物已被证明对改善AERD患者的哮喘和CRSwNP有疗效。最一致的证据似乎有利于omalizumab和dupilumab增强对非甾体抗炎药的耐受性。虽然证据仍然不确定,但ATAD和生物制剂的联合使用可能会在特定的患者中提供额外的益处。生物制剂是治疗AERD的一个很有前途的选择,特别是对阿司匹林耐受性差的患者。需要进一步的前瞻性对照研究来确定最佳治疗算法并确定预测治疗反应的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书