[Opportunities and challenges of health insurance funding of outpatient cancer counselling centers: Findings from a qualitative interview study with employees and providers].

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Susanne Kuhnt, Anne-Kathrin Köditz, Svenja Heyne, Charlotte Gmeiner, Maria Mahlberg, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Jochen Ernst
{"title":"[Opportunities and challenges of health insurance funding of outpatient cancer counselling centers: Findings from a qualitative interview study with employees and providers].","authors":"Susanne Kuhnt, Anne-Kathrin Köditz, Svenja Heyne, Charlotte Gmeiner, Maria Mahlberg, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Jochen Ernst","doi":"10.1055/a-2738-8832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2020, cancer counselling centers (CCC) are able to apply for partial funding from health insurance funds in accordance with the statutory regulation 'Outpatient cancer counselling' (§ 65e SGB V). The study examines changes in the CCCs as a result of the utilization of partial health insurance funding from the perspective of employees and of the providers of CCC.As part of a qualitative study, guided expert interviews were conducted with employees and providers of CCC and analyzed using content-structuring evaluation methods. We surveyed 138 provider organizations and 189 CCC, and interview partners were chosen in a randomized selection process. The size and region of the CCC were taken into account in order to reflect different structural and personnel requirements of the CCC. Interview topics included general expectations and concerns, changes resulting from funding and an initial assessment.Data was available from 35 interviews (23 CCC, 12 providers). The majority of CCC and their providers reported improvements in terms of staffing and services, including the continuation and expansion of care services, increased staff capacity, and the expansion of branches or the establishment of new ones. The quality of care has been improved through professional development of counsellors, extended supervision and more appropriate premises. This was perceived as an improvement in CCC in the health care system. However, it was criticized that although there is a greater sense of security, uncertainty remains because funding of CCC is limited to three years without a guarantee of continued funding, even if quality standards and cost-effectiveness are high. This has had a negative impact on staff and services. In addition, funding has focused on counselling in individual settings, which, in some cases, has led to a reduction in the variety of services offered, e. g. in-group settings.The funding of the CCC by the health insurance funds is largely viewed positively by the participants. It could be argued that this measure is an important step towards achieving the goal of securing sustainable, regular funding for outpatient cancer counselling included in the National Cancer Plan. It remains unclear whether the current funding structure will promote a nationwide network of needs-based, high-quality CCC and how the continued operation of high quality and economically viable CCC can be ensured.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":"76 1","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2738-8832","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2020, cancer counselling centers (CCC) are able to apply for partial funding from health insurance funds in accordance with the statutory regulation 'Outpatient cancer counselling' (§ 65e SGB V). The study examines changes in the CCCs as a result of the utilization of partial health insurance funding from the perspective of employees and of the providers of CCC.As part of a qualitative study, guided expert interviews were conducted with employees and providers of CCC and analyzed using content-structuring evaluation methods. We surveyed 138 provider organizations and 189 CCC, and interview partners were chosen in a randomized selection process. The size and region of the CCC were taken into account in order to reflect different structural and personnel requirements of the CCC. Interview topics included general expectations and concerns, changes resulting from funding and an initial assessment.Data was available from 35 interviews (23 CCC, 12 providers). The majority of CCC and their providers reported improvements in terms of staffing and services, including the continuation and expansion of care services, increased staff capacity, and the expansion of branches or the establishment of new ones. The quality of care has been improved through professional development of counsellors, extended supervision and more appropriate premises. This was perceived as an improvement in CCC in the health care system. However, it was criticized that although there is a greater sense of security, uncertainty remains because funding of CCC is limited to three years without a guarantee of continued funding, even if quality standards and cost-effectiveness are high. This has had a negative impact on staff and services. In addition, funding has focused on counselling in individual settings, which, in some cases, has led to a reduction in the variety of services offered, e. g. in-group settings.The funding of the CCC by the health insurance funds is largely viewed positively by the participants. It could be argued that this measure is an important step towards achieving the goal of securing sustainable, regular funding for outpatient cancer counselling included in the National Cancer Plan. It remains unclear whether the current funding structure will promote a nationwide network of needs-based, high-quality CCC and how the continued operation of high quality and economically viable CCC can be ensured.

[癌症门诊咨询中心医疗保险资助的机遇和挑战:来自员工和提供者定性访谈研究的结果]。
自2020年以来,癌症咨询中心(CCC)能够根据法定法规“门诊癌症咨询”(SGB V第65e条),从健康保险基金申请部分资金。本研究从雇员和共同承担责任的提供者的角度考察了部分医疗保险资金使用所导致的共同承担责任的变化。作为定性研究的一部分,我们对CCC的员工和供应商进行了指导专家访谈,并使用内容结构化评估方法进行了分析。我们调查了138个供应商组织和189个CCC,访谈伙伴是在随机选择过程中选择的。考虑到协调委员会的规模和区域,以反映协调委员会在结构和人员方面的不同需要。面谈的题目包括一般的期望和关切、经费和初步评估造成的变化。数据来自35个访谈(23个CCC, 12个供应商)。大多数中心及其提供者报告说,在人员配备和服务方面有所改善,包括继续和扩大护理服务,提高工作人员能力,扩大分支机构或建立新的分支机构。通过辅导员的专业发展、扩大监督和更适当的场所,护理的质量得到了改善。这被认为是卫生保健系统中CCC的改进。然而,有人批评说,虽然有了更大的安全感,但不确定性仍然存在,因为尽管质量标准和成本效益很高,但中央协调委员会的经费限于三年,没有继续供资的保证。这对工作人员和服务产生了负面影响。此外,资金集中于个别情况下的咨询,这在某些情况下导致减少了所提供的各种服务,例如:内群体设置。参与者对健康保险基金对共同合作中心的供资大体上持积极态度。可以说,这项措施是朝着实现《国家癌症计划》所列的为癌症门诊咨询提供可持续、定期资金这一目标迈出的重要一步。目前尚不清楚的是,目前的供资结构是否将促进建立一个以需求为基础的高质量协调中心全国网络,以及如何确保高质量和经济上可行的协调中心继续运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书