Unlocking the silent signals: Motor kinematics as a new frontier in early detection of mild cognitive impairment.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Takahiko Nagamine
{"title":"Unlocking the silent signals: Motor kinematics as a new frontier in early detection of mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Takahiko Nagamine","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.112073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing global prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) necessitates a paradigm shift in early detection strategies. Conventional neuropsychological assessment methods, predominantly paper-and-pencil tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, exhibit inherent limitations with respect to accessibility, administration burden, and sensitivity to subtle cognitive decline, particularly among diverse populations. This commentary critically examines a recent study that champions a novel approach: The integration of gait and handwriting kinematic parameters analyzed <i>via</i> machine learning for MCI screening. The present study positions itself within the broader landscape of MCI detection, with a view to comparing its advantages against established neuropsychological batteries, advanced neuroimaging (<i>e.g.</i>, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging), and emerging fluid biomarkers (<i>e.g.</i>, cerebrospinal fluid, blood-based assays). While the study demonstrates promising accuracy (74.44% area under the curve 0.74 with gait and graphic handwriting) and addresses key unmet needs in accessibility and objectivity, we highlight its cross-sectional nature, limited sample diversity, and lack of dual-task assessment as areas for future refinement. This commentary posits that kinematic biomarkers offer a distinctive, scalable, and ecologically valid approach to widespread MCI screening, thereby complementing existing methods by providing real-world functional insights. Future research should prioritize longitudinal validation, expansion to diverse cohorts, integration with multimodal data including dual-tasking, and the development of highly portable, artificial intelligence-driven solutions to achieve the democratization of early MCI detection and enable timely interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"16 1","pages":"112073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.112073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing global prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) necessitates a paradigm shift in early detection strategies. Conventional neuropsychological assessment methods, predominantly paper-and-pencil tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, exhibit inherent limitations with respect to accessibility, administration burden, and sensitivity to subtle cognitive decline, particularly among diverse populations. This commentary critically examines a recent study that champions a novel approach: The integration of gait and handwriting kinematic parameters analyzed via machine learning for MCI screening. The present study positions itself within the broader landscape of MCI detection, with a view to comparing its advantages against established neuropsychological batteries, advanced neuroimaging (e.g., positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging), and emerging fluid biomarkers (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid, blood-based assays). While the study demonstrates promising accuracy (74.44% area under the curve 0.74 with gait and graphic handwriting) and addresses key unmet needs in accessibility and objectivity, we highlight its cross-sectional nature, limited sample diversity, and lack of dual-task assessment as areas for future refinement. This commentary posits that kinematic biomarkers offer a distinctive, scalable, and ecologically valid approach to widespread MCI screening, thereby complementing existing methods by providing real-world functional insights. Future research should prioritize longitudinal validation, expansion to diverse cohorts, integration with multimodal data including dual-tasking, and the development of highly portable, artificial intelligence-driven solutions to achieve the democratization of early MCI detection and enable timely interventions.

解锁沉默信号:运动运动学作为轻度认知障碍早期检测的新前沿。
随着全球轻度认知障碍(MCI)的日益流行,需要在早期发现策略方面进行范式转变。传统的神经心理学评估方法,主要是纸笔测试,如迷你精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估,在可及性、管理负担和对细微认知衰退的敏感性方面表现出固有的局限性,特别是在不同人群中。这篇评论批判性地审视了最近的一项研究,该研究支持一种新方法:通过机器学习分析MCI筛查的步态和笔迹运动学参数的集成。目前的研究定位于MCI检测的更广阔的领域,目的是将其与现有的神经心理学电池、先进的神经影像学(如正电子发射断层扫描、磁共振成像)和新兴的液体生物标志物(如脑脊液、血液检测)的优势进行比较。虽然该研究显示了有希望的准确性(步态和图形手写曲线下面积为74.44%,为0.74),并解决了可访问性和客观性方面的关键未满足需求,但我们强调其横断面性质,有限的样本多样性以及缺乏双任务评估是未来改进的领域。这篇评论认为,运动学生物标志物为广泛的MCI筛查提供了一种独特的、可扩展的、生态有效的方法,从而通过提供现实世界的功能见解来补充现有的方法。未来的研究应优先考虑纵向验证,扩展到不同的队列,与包括双任务在内的多模态数据集成,以及开发高度可移植的人工智能驱动的解决方案,以实现早期MCI检测的民主化并实现及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书