Not everyone wants a seat at the table: A national segmentation of participatory needs in the Dutch energy transition

IF 2.2 Q1 Social Sciences
Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2026.107528
K. Goes , D. Corsten , N. Mouter
{"title":"Not everyone wants a seat at the table: A national segmentation of participatory needs in the Dutch energy transition","authors":"K. Goes ,&nbsp;D. Corsten ,&nbsp;N. Mouter","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2026.107528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public participation important for the social acceptance of energy policies. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how different segments of the population want to participate in energy policies. Through a national survey we investigate how different segments of the Dutch population want to participate in local and national energy transition decision-making. We identify that citizens make decision in terms of their expected gains of participating and how much time they want to invest in participation. Some citizens only want to invest a little amount of time and as a consequence these citizens will only participate in processes with a low time investment. Second, we observe a climate concern paradox where individuals concerned about climate change often refrain from participating in formal processes due to distrust in government and perceived tokenism, preferring activism instead. Our results highlight the need for an attentive democracy where policymakers are better informed about public desires before initiating participatory processes. We introduce a novel, citizen-centric method for segmenting the population according to their participatory needs in energy transition decision-making. This approach surpasses existing typologies by aligning engagement processes more accurately with local needs, mitigating participation fatigue, and enhancing the effectiveness of participatory efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"39 2","pages":"Article 107528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619026000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public participation important for the social acceptance of energy policies. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how different segments of the population want to participate in energy policies. Through a national survey we investigate how different segments of the Dutch population want to participate in local and national energy transition decision-making. We identify that citizens make decision in terms of their expected gains of participating and how much time they want to invest in participation. Some citizens only want to invest a little amount of time and as a consequence these citizens will only participate in processes with a low time investment. Second, we observe a climate concern paradox where individuals concerned about climate change often refrain from participating in formal processes due to distrust in government and perceived tokenism, preferring activism instead. Our results highlight the need for an attentive democracy where policymakers are better informed about public desires before initiating participatory processes. We introduce a novel, citizen-centric method for segmenting the population according to their participatory needs in energy transition decision-making. This approach surpasses existing typologies by aligning engagement processes more accurately with local needs, mitigating participation fatigue, and enhancing the effectiveness of participatory efforts.
不是每个人都想在谈判桌上占有一席之地:荷兰能源转型中参与性需求的国家分割
公众参与对社会接受能源政策很重要。然而,人们对不同人群希望如何参与能源政策缺乏了解。通过一项全国调查,我们调查了荷兰不同人群希望参与地方和国家能源转型决策的情况。我们确定公民是根据他们参与的预期收益和他们愿意投入多少时间来做出决定的。有些公民只愿意投入少量的时间,因此这些公民只会参与低时间投入的过程。其次,我们观察到一个气候关注悖论,即关注气候变化的个人往往由于对政府的不信任和认为的象征性而不愿参与正式程序,而宁愿采取行动。我们的研究结果强调,需要一个细心的民主,政策制定者在启动参与性进程之前更好地了解公众的愿望。我们介绍了一种新颖的、以公民为中心的方法,根据他们在能源转型决策中的参与需求对人口进行细分。这种方法超越了现有的类型,更准确地将参与过程与当地需求结合起来,减轻了参与疲劳,提高了参与工作的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书