{"title":"Impact of Psychosocial intervention on Quality of life in patients with post- traumatic limb amputation/s: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Milandeep , Rajesh Sagar , Sushma Sagar , Pratyusha Priyadarshini , Abhinav Kumar , Junaid Alam , Dinesh Bagaria , Narendra Chaudhary , Amit Gupta , Biplab Mishra , Anamika Sahu , Shivam Pandey , Subodh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Trauma results in approximately 1.19 million deaths and 20–50 million disabilities globally each year. With increasing industrialization, road traffic injuries have become a leading cause of Disability Adjusted Life Years and traumatic amputations. These sudden amputations often lead to significant psychological distress. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in enhancing the Quality of Life of post-traumatic amputees.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial enrolled 74 post-traumatic extremity amputees aged over 18 years, who were cognitively coherent, had adequate social support, and no prior psychological illness. Following baseline psychosocial assessment, participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (<em>n</em> = 39) received conventional care, while Group B (<em>n</em> = 35) received both psychosocial intervention and conventional care for seven weeks. Psychosocial outcomes were reassessed in both groups at the eighth week post-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Quality of life showed significant improvement in both the groups. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. Level of depression, anxiety and stress significantly decreased in both the groups at 8 weeks, but the difference was not significant between the groups. However, body image showed a significant improvement in Group B as compared to Group A (<em>p</em> = 0.023).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study did not show any observable positive effects of psychosocial intervention over conventional care on quality of life, depression, stress, or anxiety except on body image. We hypothesize that positive results might be seen in quality of life of amputees if a larger study with longer duration of psychosocial intervention is conducted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 113027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138326000148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Trauma results in approximately 1.19 million deaths and 20–50 million disabilities globally each year. With increasing industrialization, road traffic injuries have become a leading cause of Disability Adjusted Life Years and traumatic amputations. These sudden amputations often lead to significant psychological distress. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in enhancing the Quality of Life of post-traumatic amputees.
Material and Methods
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 74 post-traumatic extremity amputees aged over 18 years, who were cognitively coherent, had adequate social support, and no prior psychological illness. Following baseline psychosocial assessment, participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n = 39) received conventional care, while Group B (n = 35) received both psychosocial intervention and conventional care for seven weeks. Psychosocial outcomes were reassessed in both groups at the eighth week post-intervention.
Results
Quality of life showed significant improvement in both the groups. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. Level of depression, anxiety and stress significantly decreased in both the groups at 8 weeks, but the difference was not significant between the groups. However, body image showed a significant improvement in Group B as compared to Group A (p = 0.023).
Conclusion
Our study did not show any observable positive effects of psychosocial intervention over conventional care on quality of life, depression, stress, or anxiety except on body image. We hypothesize that positive results might be seen in quality of life of amputees if a larger study with longer duration of psychosocial intervention is conducted.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.