Impact of Psychosocial intervention on Quality of life in patients with post- traumatic limb amputation/s: a randomized controlled trial

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Milandeep , Rajesh Sagar , Sushma Sagar , Pratyusha Priyadarshini , Abhinav Kumar , Junaid Alam , Dinesh Bagaria , Narendra Chaudhary , Amit Gupta , Biplab Mishra , Anamika Sahu , Shivam Pandey , Subodh Kumar
{"title":"Impact of Psychosocial intervention on Quality of life in patients with post- traumatic limb amputation/s: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Milandeep ,&nbsp;Rajesh Sagar ,&nbsp;Sushma Sagar ,&nbsp;Pratyusha Priyadarshini ,&nbsp;Abhinav Kumar ,&nbsp;Junaid Alam ,&nbsp;Dinesh Bagaria ,&nbsp;Narendra Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Amit Gupta ,&nbsp;Biplab Mishra ,&nbsp;Anamika Sahu ,&nbsp;Shivam Pandey ,&nbsp;Subodh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Trauma results in approximately 1.19 million deaths and 20–50 million disabilities globally each year. With increasing industrialization, road traffic injuries have become a leading cause of Disability Adjusted Life Years and traumatic amputations. These sudden amputations often lead to significant psychological distress. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in enhancing the Quality of Life of post-traumatic amputees.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial enrolled 74 post-traumatic extremity amputees aged over 18 years, who were cognitively coherent, had adequate social support, and no prior psychological illness. Following baseline psychosocial assessment, participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (<em>n</em> = 39) received conventional care, while Group B (<em>n</em> = 35) received both psychosocial intervention and conventional care for seven weeks. Psychosocial outcomes were reassessed in both groups at the eighth week post-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Quality of life showed significant improvement in both the groups. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. Level of depression, anxiety and stress significantly decreased in both the groups at 8 weeks, but the difference was not significant between the groups. However, body image showed a significant improvement in Group B as compared to Group A (<em>p</em> = 0.023).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study did not show any observable positive effects of psychosocial intervention over conventional care on quality of life, depression, stress, or anxiety except on body image. We hypothesize that positive results might be seen in quality of life of amputees if a larger study with longer duration of psychosocial intervention is conducted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 113027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138326000148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Trauma results in approximately 1.19 million deaths and 20–50 million disabilities globally each year. With increasing industrialization, road traffic injuries have become a leading cause of Disability Adjusted Life Years and traumatic amputations. These sudden amputations often lead to significant psychological distress. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in enhancing the Quality of Life of post-traumatic amputees.

Material and Methods

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 74 post-traumatic extremity amputees aged over 18 years, who were cognitively coherent, had adequate social support, and no prior psychological illness. Following baseline psychosocial assessment, participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n = 39) received conventional care, while Group B (n = 35) received both psychosocial intervention and conventional care for seven weeks. Psychosocial outcomes were reassessed in both groups at the eighth week post-intervention.

Results

Quality of life showed significant improvement in both the groups. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. Level of depression, anxiety and stress significantly decreased in both the groups at 8 weeks, but the difference was not significant between the groups. However, body image showed a significant improvement in Group B as compared to Group A (p = 0.023).

Conclusion

Our study did not show any observable positive effects of psychosocial intervention over conventional care on quality of life, depression, stress, or anxiety except on body image. We hypothesize that positive results might be seen in quality of life of amputees if a larger study with longer duration of psychosocial intervention is conducted.
心理社会干预对创伤性肢体截肢患者生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验:创伤性截肢患者的心理社会护理。
导言:全球每年约有119万人死于创伤,2000万至5000万人残疾。随着工业化程度的提高,道路交通伤害已成为伤残调整寿命年和创伤性截肢的主要原因。这些突然的截肢通常会导致严重的心理困扰。本研究旨在评估心理社会干预在提高创伤后截肢者生活质量方面的有效性。材料和方法:本随机对照试验招募了74名18岁以上的创伤后四肢截肢者,他们认知连贯,有足够的社会支持,没有先前的心理疾病。在基线心理社会评估之后,参与者被随机分为两组:A组(n = 39)接受常规护理,而B组(n = 35)接受心理社会干预和常规护理,为期7周。在干预后第8周对两组患者的心理社会结果进行重新评估。结果:两组患者的生活质量均有明显改善。然而,两组之间没有显著差异。8周时,两组患者抑郁、焦虑和压力水平均显著降低,但两组间差异不显著。然而,与a组相比,B组的身体形象有显著改善(p = 0.023)。结论:除了身体形象,我们的研究没有显示任何可观察到的心理社会干预在生活质量、抑郁、压力或焦虑方面优于传统护理的积极作用。我们假设,如果进行更大规模的长期社会心理干预研究,可能会在截肢者的生活质量方面看到积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书