Perceptions of Sports Betting and Promotions in the U.S.: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Comments.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Gambling Studies Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1007/s10899-025-10467-y
Kwangmi Kim, Kyungeun Park, Kyongil Yoon, Yanggon Kim
{"title":"Perceptions of Sports Betting and Promotions in the U.S.: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Comments.","authors":"Kwangmi Kim, Kyungeun Park, Kyongil Yoon, Yanggon Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10899-025-10467-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines public attitudes toward sports betting and promotions in the United States by analyzing YouTube comments. Using keyword searches, 210 videos were identified, yielding 2,369 comments for analysis. A hybrid approach combining automated BERT sentiment analysis with human-coded content analysis was employed to determine overall sentiment and to identify key themes, endorsers, and sportsbook brands. Results revealed a predominance of negative and neutral sentiments, with positive sentiments least frequent. BERT detected more negative sentiments than the human-coded analysis, which indicated a more balanced distribution. Content analysis showed that positive responses were often directed at entertainment features such as humor, music, and celebrities, whereas negative responses focused on celebrity endorsements, excessive advertising exposure, and frustrations with sportsbook brands' customer services. Prominent celebrities, including Charles Barkley and Paige Spiranac, received relatively favorable comments, while Wayne Gretzky and Jamie Foxx were criticized. Larger sportsbook brands such as BetMGM, DraftKings, and FanDuel were mentioned most often but attracted more negative feedback compared with smaller brands. These findings underscore the need for advertisers to balance entertainment with responsibility, for sports betting operators to improve transparency and user experience, and for regulators to establish clearer guidelines on advertising practices. Future research should consider longitudinal approaches and extend analysis to additional social media platforms to capture evolving public attitudes toward sports betting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gambling Studies","volume":" ","pages":"645-662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13269447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gambling Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-025-10467-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines public attitudes toward sports betting and promotions in the United States by analyzing YouTube comments. Using keyword searches, 210 videos were identified, yielding 2,369 comments for analysis. A hybrid approach combining automated BERT sentiment analysis with human-coded content analysis was employed to determine overall sentiment and to identify key themes, endorsers, and sportsbook brands. Results revealed a predominance of negative and neutral sentiments, with positive sentiments least frequent. BERT detected more negative sentiments than the human-coded analysis, which indicated a more balanced distribution. Content analysis showed that positive responses were often directed at entertainment features such as humor, music, and celebrities, whereas negative responses focused on celebrity endorsements, excessive advertising exposure, and frustrations with sportsbook brands' customer services. Prominent celebrities, including Charles Barkley and Paige Spiranac, received relatively favorable comments, while Wayne Gretzky and Jamie Foxx were criticized. Larger sportsbook brands such as BetMGM, DraftKings, and FanDuel were mentioned most often but attracted more negative feedback compared with smaller brands. These findings underscore the need for advertisers to balance entertainment with responsibility, for sports betting operators to improve transparency and user experience, and for regulators to establish clearer guidelines on advertising practices. Future research should consider longitudinal approaches and extend analysis to additional social media platforms to capture evolving public attitudes toward sports betting.

对美国体育博彩和促销的看法:来自YouTube评论的混合方法情感分析的证据。
这项研究通过分析YouTube上的评论来调查美国公众对体育博彩和促销的态度。通过关键词搜索,识别出210个视频,产生2369条评论供分析。采用一种将自动BERT情感分析与人工编码内容分析相结合的混合方法来确定整体情绪,并确定关键主题、代言人和体育博彩品牌。结果显示,消极和中性情绪占主导地位,积极情绪最少。BERT比人工编码的分析发现了更多的负面情绪,这表明了更平衡的分布。内容分析显示,积极的反应通常是针对幽默、音乐和名人等娱乐特征,而消极的反应则集中在名人代言、过度的广告曝光和对体育博彩品牌客户服务的不满上。包括查尔斯·巴克利和佩吉·斯皮拉纳克在内的著名明星得到了相对有利的评价,而韦恩·格雷茨基和杰米·福克斯则受到了批评。BetMGM、DraftKings和FanDuel等大型体育博彩品牌被提及最多,但与小品牌相比,它们获得的负面反馈更多。这些发现强调,广告商需要平衡娱乐与责任,体育博彩运营商需要提高透明度和用户体验,监管机构需要制定更明确的广告实践指导方针。未来的研究应该考虑纵向方法,并将分析扩展到其他社交媒体平台,以捕捉公众对体育博彩不断变化的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Journal of Gambling Studies is an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination on the many aspects of gambling behavior, both controlled and pathological, as well as variety of problems attendant to, or resultant from, gambling behavior including alcoholism, suicide, crime, and a number of other mental health problems. Articles published in this journal are representative of a cross-section of disciplines including psychiatry, psychology, sociology, political science, criminology, and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书