Underreporting of Coronary Stents in LDCT for Lung Cancer Screening and Their Differentiation From Severe Coronary Artery Calcifications.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Carlo Tessa, Giulia Picozzi, Diletta Cozzi, Edoardo Cavigli, Luca Gozzi, Jasmine Giovannoli, Giuseppe Gorini, Stefano Diciotti, Mario Mascalchi
{"title":"Underreporting of Coronary Stents in LDCT for Lung Cancer Screening and Their Differentiation From Severe Coronary Artery Calcifications.","authors":"Carlo Tessa, Giulia Picozzi, Diletta Cozzi, Edoardo Cavigli, Luca Gozzi, Jasmine Giovannoli, Giuseppe Gorini, Stefano Diciotti, Mario Mascalchi","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung Cancer (LC) screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) is recommended in smokers and former smokers irrespective of cardiovascular disease (CVD) history. Differentiating coronary stents from moderate-to-severe coronary artery calcifications (CACs) on LDCT examinations can be challenging and have clinical implications. We hypothesized that coronary stents are inadequately reported in screening LDCT examinations and conducted a retrospective analysis nested within an LC screening study. Moreover, we devised a postprocessing procedure to differentiate coronary stents and severe CACs in LDCT examinations and assessed its potential. Among 592 participants with detailed CVD history at baseline, the LDCT report mentioned coronary stents in 13 and severe CACs in 60 of 73 (12.3%). Two radiologists independently and blindly reviewed the LDCT examinations, providing a binary judgment (yes/no) on stent presence using images optimized with a window setting optimized to view detail in bone (window width 1800 to 2000 HU and window level 300 to 500 HU) reformatted parallel or perpendicular to the coronary arteries. The review identified stents in 26 subjects and was inconclusive in 2. On images viewed with such \"bone\" window setting, stents appeared as \"tram-track\" (large stents) or \"pencil-lead\" (narrow stents) configurations in parallel views, and as a \"rim-of-wheel\" shape in perpendicular views. In contrast, CACs lacked these configurations due to their irregular distribution along vessel walls. No difference in attenuation was observed between stents and severe CACs. Concordance with the history of PTCA with stent placement was 42.8% (12/28) for the original LDCT reports and 92.8% (26/28) for the review ( P =0.0014). Our study suggests that coronary stents are often under-reported in screening LDCT, but their characteristic shapes on images viewed with a \"bone\" window setting with multiplanar reformatting can aid in accurate identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":"419-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13174938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung Cancer (LC) screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) is recommended in smokers and former smokers irrespective of cardiovascular disease (CVD) history. Differentiating coronary stents from moderate-to-severe coronary artery calcifications (CACs) on LDCT examinations can be challenging and have clinical implications. We hypothesized that coronary stents are inadequately reported in screening LDCT examinations and conducted a retrospective analysis nested within an LC screening study. Moreover, we devised a postprocessing procedure to differentiate coronary stents and severe CACs in LDCT examinations and assessed its potential. Among 592 participants with detailed CVD history at baseline, the LDCT report mentioned coronary stents in 13 and severe CACs in 60 of 73 (12.3%). Two radiologists independently and blindly reviewed the LDCT examinations, providing a binary judgment (yes/no) on stent presence using images optimized with a window setting optimized to view detail in bone (window width 1800 to 2000 HU and window level 300 to 500 HU) reformatted parallel or perpendicular to the coronary arteries. The review identified stents in 26 subjects and was inconclusive in 2. On images viewed with such "bone" window setting, stents appeared as "tram-track" (large stents) or "pencil-lead" (narrow stents) configurations in parallel views, and as a "rim-of-wheel" shape in perpendicular views. In contrast, CACs lacked these configurations due to their irregular distribution along vessel walls. No difference in attenuation was observed between stents and severe CACs. Concordance with the history of PTCA with stent placement was 42.8% (12/28) for the original LDCT reports and 92.8% (26/28) for the review ( P =0.0014). Our study suggests that coronary stents are often under-reported in screening LDCT, but their characteristic shapes on images viewed with a "bone" window setting with multiplanar reformatting can aid in accurate identification.

LDCT对肺癌筛查中冠状动脉支架的漏报及其与严重冠状动脉钙化的鉴别。
无论是否有心血管疾病史,建议吸烟者和前吸烟者使用低剂量CT (LDCT)进行肺癌筛查。在LDCT检查中区分冠状动脉支架与中度至重度冠状动脉钙化(CACs)具有挑战性和临床意义。我们假设冠状动脉支架在LDCT筛查中的报道不足,并在LC筛查研究中进行了回顾性分析。此外,我们设计了一种后处理程序来区分LDCT检查中的冠状动脉支架和严重cac,并评估其潜力。在592名基线时有详细CVD病史的参与者中,LDCT报告中提到了13例冠状动脉支架,73例中有60例(12.3%)有严重的CACs。两名放射科医生独立且盲目地审查了LDCT检查,使用优化的图像(窗口设置优化到可以查看骨骼的细节,窗口宽度为1800至2000 HU,窗口水平为300至500 HU)重新格式化平行或垂直于冠状动脉,对支架是否存在提供二元判断(是/否)。该综述在26名受试者中发现了支架,其中2名未确定。在以这种“骨”窗设置观看的图像中,支架在平行视图中显示为“电车轨道”(大支架)或“铅笔芯”(窄支架)结构,在垂直视图中显示为“轮辋”形状。相比之下,CACs由于沿血管壁的不规则分布而缺乏这些构型。在支架和严重的冠脉冠脉之间没有观察到衰减差异。原始LDCT报告中PTCA与支架置入史的一致性为42.8%(12/28),回顾报告中为92.8% (26/28)(P=0.0014)。我们的研究表明,冠状动脉支架在LDCT筛查中经常被低估,但它们在“骨”窗口设置和多平面重新格式化的图像上的特征形状有助于准确识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书