Amniotic Membrane (AM) Covered Airway Stent Mitigates Airway Injury and Complications: A Comparative In Vivo Study in a Porcine Model.

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Roy Joseph Cho, Davis Seelig, Danielle Burroughs, Mitchell Bemenderfer, Walt Tollison, Eric Edell
{"title":"Amniotic Membrane (AM) Covered Airway Stent Mitigates Airway Injury and Complications: A Comparative In Vivo Study in a Porcine Model.","authors":"Roy Joseph Cho, Davis Seelig, Danielle Burroughs, Mitchell Bemenderfer, Walt Tollison, Eric Edell","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000001052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway stenting is a critical intervention to restore airway patency, yet complications such as stent migration, mucostasis, airway injury, and granulation tissue formation remain major concerns. Although various covering materials have been explored, the effectiveness of amniotic membrane (AM) as a stent cover has not been evaluated. This study is the first to assess airway-related complications of a novel AM-covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) compared with a commercially available synthetic polymer-covered SEMS. To compare the incidence of stent-related complications between AM-covered SEMS and synthetic polymer-covered SEMS over a 90-day in vivo survival period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight adult Yucatan miniswine were implanted with either an AM-covered or control stent and monitored over 90 days with bronchoscopic evaluations at 4 timepoints. Histologic assessments were performed at termination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven animals completed the study (4 AM stents, 3 controls). One control animal was terminated early due to stent expectoration. AM-covered stents were associated with reduced stent migration, mucostasis, and granulation tissue formation compared with controls. Histologic analysis revealed significantly less airway injury and evidence of re-epithelialization with cilia in the AM group; a feature absent in control stents. One animal was excluded at implantation and replaced due to a procedural complication unrelated to the stent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate stent-related complications of AM-covered airway stents. The results demonstrate that AM-covered SEMS reduce airway injury and common complications associated with synthetic polymer-covered stents. These findings suggest that AM-coverings may enhance biocompatibility and integration while mitigating adverse airway responses. Larger studies and human clinical trials are needed to validate these results and explore clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000001052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airway stenting is a critical intervention to restore airway patency, yet complications such as stent migration, mucostasis, airway injury, and granulation tissue formation remain major concerns. Although various covering materials have been explored, the effectiveness of amniotic membrane (AM) as a stent cover has not been evaluated. This study is the first to assess airway-related complications of a novel AM-covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) compared with a commercially available synthetic polymer-covered SEMS. To compare the incidence of stent-related complications between AM-covered SEMS and synthetic polymer-covered SEMS over a 90-day in vivo survival period.

Methods: Eight adult Yucatan miniswine were implanted with either an AM-covered or control stent and monitored over 90 days with bronchoscopic evaluations at 4 timepoints. Histologic assessments were performed at termination.

Results: Seven animals completed the study (4 AM stents, 3 controls). One control animal was terminated early due to stent expectoration. AM-covered stents were associated with reduced stent migration, mucostasis, and granulation tissue formation compared with controls. Histologic analysis revealed significantly less airway injury and evidence of re-epithelialization with cilia in the AM group; a feature absent in control stents. One animal was excluded at implantation and replaced due to a procedural complication unrelated to the stent.

Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate stent-related complications of AM-covered airway stents. The results demonstrate that AM-covered SEMS reduce airway injury and common complications associated with synthetic polymer-covered stents. These findings suggest that AM-coverings may enhance biocompatibility and integration while mitigating adverse airway responses. Larger studies and human clinical trials are needed to validate these results and explore clinical application.

羊膜(AM)覆盖气道支架减轻气道损伤和并发症:猪模型的体内比较研究。
背景:气道支架置入术是恢复气道通畅的关键干预措施,但支架移位、粘膜静止、气道损伤和肉芽组织形成等并发症仍然是主要关注的问题。尽管已经探索了各种覆盖材料,但羊膜(AM)作为支架覆盖的有效性尚未得到评估。这项研究首次评估了新型am覆盖自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)与市售合成聚合物覆盖SEMS的气道相关并发症。比较am覆盖的SEMS和合成聚合物覆盖的SEMS在90天的体内生存期内支架相关并发症的发生率。方法:8名成年尤卡坦迷你犬植入am覆盖支架或对照支架,并在4个时间点进行支气管镜评估,监测90天。终止时进行组织学评估。结果:7只动物完成了研究(4只AM支架,3只对照组)。1只对照动物因支架排痰而提前终止。与对照组相比,am覆盖支架与支架迁移、粘膜稳定和肉芽组织形成减少有关。组织学分析显示,AM组气道损伤明显减轻,有纤毛再上皮化的证据;这是对照支架所没有的特征。由于与支架无关的手术并发症,一只动物在植入时被排除并更换。结论:这是第一个评估am覆盖气道支架相关并发症的研究。结果表明,am覆盖的SEMS可以减少气道损伤和与合成聚合物覆盖支架相关的常见并发症。这些发现表明am覆盖物可以增强生物相容性和整合,同时减轻气道不良反应。需要更大规模的研究和人体临床试验来验证这些结果并探索临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书