Application of Double-Colored Die-Stone as an Alternative Approach for Achieving Superior Finish Line Precision in Dental Casts: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-01-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/8947455
Ahmad Toumaj, Akram Ghannadpour, Mahtab Mottaghi, Mirkamal Hosseiny, Seyed Mehdi Ziaei, Mona Saligherad, Kiarash Kiani
{"title":"Application of Double-Colored Die-Stone as an Alternative Approach for Achieving Superior Finish Line Precision in Dental Casts: A Comparative In Vitro Study.","authors":"Ahmad Toumaj, Akram Ghannadpour, Mahtab Mottaghi, Mirkamal Hosseiny, Seyed Mehdi Ziaei, Mona Saligherad, Kiarash Kiani","doi":"10.1155/ijod/8947455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Determining the finish line on the master cast is essential to create proper restoration. We aimed to compare the finish line accuracy in casts created using the conventional technique, digital technique, and an alternative approach called the double-colored die-stone (DCDS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tooth 24 in an upper jaw typodont was prepared with a chamfer finish line. Twenty impressions were taken from the typodont and were divided into conventional (<i>n</i> = 10) and DCDS (<i>n</i> = 10). Ten digital impressions were taken using an intraoral scanner, and a 3D printer made the digital cast. We applied a single-color die-stone in the conventional method, while we used two colors of die-stone in the DCDS group. We assessed the finish lines, focusing on the area of valid distance, distance standard deviation, integrated absolute distance, and mean distance. A reference model was created to evaluate the area of valid distance across different techniques. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area of valid distance was significantly higher in the DCDS group than in the digital group (<i>p</i>  < 0.001). The integrated absolute distance was notably greater in the digital group than in the conventional group (<i>p</i>  < 0.001). We revealed significant differences in the area of valid distance between the digital, conventional, and DCDS groups compared to the reference model (<i>p</i>  = 0.002, <i>p</i>  = 0.002, and <i>p</i>  = 0.011, respectively). However, the DCDS group demonstrated the closest alignment with the reference model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the DCDS technique could offer an effective alternative to the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The current study highlights the DCDS as a reliable alternative to conventional and digital methods, exhibiting acceptable precision in replicating the finish line. This technology enhances the visualization of the finish line, improving prosthetics' fabrication process.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"8947455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/8947455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Determining the finish line on the master cast is essential to create proper restoration. We aimed to compare the finish line accuracy in casts created using the conventional technique, digital technique, and an alternative approach called the double-colored die-stone (DCDS) technique.

Methods: The tooth 24 in an upper jaw typodont was prepared with a chamfer finish line. Twenty impressions were taken from the typodont and were divided into conventional (n = 10) and DCDS (n = 10). Ten digital impressions were taken using an intraoral scanner, and a 3D printer made the digital cast. We applied a single-color die-stone in the conventional method, while we used two colors of die-stone in the DCDS group. We assessed the finish lines, focusing on the area of valid distance, distance standard deviation, integrated absolute distance, and mean distance. A reference model was created to evaluate the area of valid distance across different techniques. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results: The area of valid distance was significantly higher in the DCDS group than in the digital group (p  < 0.001). The integrated absolute distance was notably greater in the digital group than in the conventional group (p  < 0.001). We revealed significant differences in the area of valid distance between the digital, conventional, and DCDS groups compared to the reference model (p  = 0.002, p  = 0.002, and p  = 0.011, respectively). However, the DCDS group demonstrated the closest alignment with the reference model.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the DCDS technique could offer an effective alternative to the conventional method.

Clinical significance: The current study highlights the DCDS as a reliable alternative to conventional and digital methods, exhibiting acceptable precision in replicating the finish line. This technology enhances the visualization of the finish line, improving prosthetics' fabrication process.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

应用双色模石作为一种替代方法,在牙科铸型中获得更高的终点线精度:一项体外比较研究。
简介:确定主铸件的终点线对于创建适当的修复是至关重要的。我们的目的是比较使用传统技术、数字技术和一种称为双色模石(DCDS)技术的替代方法创建的铸件的终点线精度。方法:采用倒角终点线制备上颌排印突牙24。从排版器中取出20个印痕,分为常规(n = 10)和DCDS (n = 10)。使用口腔内扫描仪进行10次数字印模,并使用3D打印机进行数字铸型。我们在常规方法中使用单色模石,而在DCDS组中我们使用两种颜色的模石。我们对终点线进行了评估,重点关注有效距离面积、距离标准差、综合绝对距离和平均距离。建立了一个参考模型来评估不同技术的有效距离面积。采用Kruskal-Wallis和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计分析。结果:DCDS组有效距离面积明显高于数字组(p < 0.001)。数字组的综合绝对距离明显大于常规组(p < 0.001)。我们发现,与参考模型相比,数字组、常规组和DCDS组的有效距离面积存在显著差异(p = 0.002、p = 0.002和p = 0.011)。然而,DCDS组表现出与参考模型最接近的一致性。结论:本研究提示DCDS技术可作为传统方法的有效替代。临床意义:目前的研究强调DCDS是传统和数字方法的可靠替代方案,在复制终点线方面表现出可接受的精度。这项技术增强了终点线的可视化,改善了假肢的制造过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书