Regulatory landscape for CAR-T therapy development in the Brazilian context.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2026.2617956
Felipe Pantoja Mesquita, Marília Silveira Maia, Pedro Filho Noronha Souza, Luany Elvira Mesquita Carvalho, Luciana Maria de Barros Carlos, Fernando Barroso Duarte
{"title":"Regulatory landscape for CAR-T therapy development in the Brazilian context.","authors":"Felipe Pantoja Mesquita, Marília Silveira Maia, Pedro Filho Noronha Souza, Luany Elvira Mesquita Carvalho, Luciana Maria de Barros Carlos, Fernando Barroso Duarte","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2026.2617956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy represents a significant advance in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, yet its global implementation remains limited by regulatory, logistical, and manufacturing challenges. Understanding differences among international regulatory frameworks is essential for expanding safe and equitable access, particularly in emerging academic programs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines the regulatory pathways, manufacturing requirements, and quality standards governing CAR-T therapies in Brazil, comparing them with those in the United States and the European Union. A focused literature search encompassed peer-reviewed articles, institutional guidelines, and regulatory documents from 2016 to 2025. Key elements assessed include GMP expectations, analytical method validation, biosafety considerations, and infrastructure requirements. The analysis also explores expanded-access mechanisms and summarizes clinical experiences that have used these pathways in the real world.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite structural differences, all jurisdictions converge on core principles emphasizing product quality, long-term safety, and traceability. However, Brazil faces unique multi-agency coordination requirements and infrastructural constraints that may delay national deployment. Global evidence indicates that strengthening GMP facilities, analytical validation strategies, and harmonized regulatory processes, particularly for academic and point-of-care manufacturing, will be crucial to broaden access and sustain innovation in CAR-T therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"847-864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2617956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy represents a significant advance in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, yet its global implementation remains limited by regulatory, logistical, and manufacturing challenges. Understanding differences among international regulatory frameworks is essential for expanding safe and equitable access, particularly in emerging academic programs.

Areas covered: This review examines the regulatory pathways, manufacturing requirements, and quality standards governing CAR-T therapies in Brazil, comparing them with those in the United States and the European Union. A focused literature search encompassed peer-reviewed articles, institutional guidelines, and regulatory documents from 2016 to 2025. Key elements assessed include GMP expectations, analytical method validation, biosafety considerations, and infrastructure requirements. The analysis also explores expanded-access mechanisms and summarizes clinical experiences that have used these pathways in the real world.

Expert opinion: Despite structural differences, all jurisdictions converge on core principles emphasizing product quality, long-term safety, and traceability. However, Brazil faces unique multi-agency coordination requirements and infrastructural constraints that may delay national deployment. Global evidence indicates that strengthening GMP facilities, analytical validation strategies, and harmonized regulatory processes, particularly for academic and point-of-care manufacturing, will be crucial to broaden access and sustain innovation in CAR-T therapies.

巴西car-t疗法发展的监管环境。
嵌合抗原受体T (CAR-T)疗法代表了血液系统恶性肿瘤治疗的重大进展,但其全球实施仍受到监管、物流和制造挑战的限制。了解国际监管框架之间的差异对于扩大安全和公平获取至关重要,特别是在新兴的学术项目中。涵盖领域:本综述考察了巴西CAR-T疗法的监管途径、生产要求和质量标准,并将其与美国和欧盟进行了比较。重点文献检索包括2016年至2025年的同行评议文章、机构指南和监管文件。评估的关键要素包括GMP期望、分析方法验证、生物安全考虑和基础设施要求。分析还探讨了扩展访问机制,并总结了在现实世界中使用这些途径的临床经验。专家意见:尽管存在结构性差异,但所有司法管辖区都在强调产品质量、长期安全性和可追溯性的核心原则上趋于一致。然而,巴西面临着独特的多机构协调要求和基础设施限制,可能会推迟国家部署。全球证据表明,加强GMP设施、分析验证策略和统一的监管程序,特别是在学术和护理点制造方面,对于扩大CAR-T疗法的可及性和维持创新至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书