Felipe Pantoja Mesquita, Marília Silveira Maia, Pedro Filho Noronha Souza, Luany Elvira Mesquita Carvalho, Luciana Maria de Barros Carlos, Fernando Barroso Duarte
{"title":"Regulatory landscape for CAR-T therapy development in the Brazilian context.","authors":"Felipe Pantoja Mesquita, Marília Silveira Maia, Pedro Filho Noronha Souza, Luany Elvira Mesquita Carvalho, Luciana Maria de Barros Carlos, Fernando Barroso Duarte","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2026.2617956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy represents a significant advance in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, yet its global implementation remains limited by regulatory, logistical, and manufacturing challenges. Understanding differences among international regulatory frameworks is essential for expanding safe and equitable access, particularly in emerging academic programs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines the regulatory pathways, manufacturing requirements, and quality standards governing CAR-T therapies in Brazil, comparing them with those in the United States and the European Union. A focused literature search encompassed peer-reviewed articles, institutional guidelines, and regulatory documents from 2016 to 2025. Key elements assessed include GMP expectations, analytical method validation, biosafety considerations, and infrastructure requirements. The analysis also explores expanded-access mechanisms and summarizes clinical experiences that have used these pathways in the real world.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite structural differences, all jurisdictions converge on core principles emphasizing product quality, long-term safety, and traceability. However, Brazil faces unique multi-agency coordination requirements and infrastructural constraints that may delay national deployment. Global evidence indicates that strengthening GMP facilities, analytical validation strategies, and harmonized regulatory processes, particularly for academic and point-of-care manufacturing, will be crucial to broaden access and sustain innovation in CAR-T therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"847-864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2617956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy represents a significant advance in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, yet its global implementation remains limited by regulatory, logistical, and manufacturing challenges. Understanding differences among international regulatory frameworks is essential for expanding safe and equitable access, particularly in emerging academic programs.
Areas covered: This review examines the regulatory pathways, manufacturing requirements, and quality standards governing CAR-T therapies in Brazil, comparing them with those in the United States and the European Union. A focused literature search encompassed peer-reviewed articles, institutional guidelines, and regulatory documents from 2016 to 2025. Key elements assessed include GMP expectations, analytical method validation, biosafety considerations, and infrastructure requirements. The analysis also explores expanded-access mechanisms and summarizes clinical experiences that have used these pathways in the real world.
Expert opinion: Despite structural differences, all jurisdictions converge on core principles emphasizing product quality, long-term safety, and traceability. However, Brazil faces unique multi-agency coordination requirements and infrastructural constraints that may delay national deployment. Global evidence indicates that strengthening GMP facilities, analytical validation strategies, and harmonized regulatory processes, particularly for academic and point-of-care manufacturing, will be crucial to broaden access and sustain innovation in CAR-T therapies.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.