Tree-based machine learning models for predicting the maximum depth of corrosion defects based on historical in-line inspection data

IF 5 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Eyad Abdullah Alshaye , Atif Saeed AlZahrani , Abduljabar Qassam Al-Sayoud , Md Shafiullah
{"title":"Tree-based machine learning models for predicting the maximum depth of corrosion defects based on historical in-line inspection data","authors":"Eyad Abdullah Alshaye ,&nbsp;Atif Saeed AlZahrani ,&nbsp;Abduljabar Qassam Al-Sayoud ,&nbsp;Md Shafiullah","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil and gas pipelines are the primary means of fluid transportation in the industry due to their efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. However, pipeline corrosion poses significant risks, leading to loss of containment, operational interruptions, and potential loss of life if undetected or unmitigated. The introduction of novel and corrosive fluid, such as hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), is expected to exacerbate corrosion-related issues. Consequently, pipeline inspection techniques, particularly in-line inspection (ILI), are increasingly vital for corrosion monitoring. This paper establishes a framework for utilizing ILI data to develop machine learning models for corrosion prediction. Four tree-based machine learning techniques—eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Dropouts meet multiple Additive Regression Trees (DART), Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM) with linear trees, and random forests—were employed to predict the maximum depth of corrosion defects based exclusively on historical ILI data. All models significantly outperformed the Naïve forecasting benchmark, with the best model achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.368 mm on the test set, surpassing the benchmark by 41.5 %. Furthermore, the accuracy of these models exceeded that of most service-based corrosion prediction models in the literature. This was achieved using an ILI dataset that exhibited extreme variations in maximum depth distribution and changes in reporting criteria. These findings indicate that the proposed framework is a superior alternative to service-based models, leveraging the vast amount of ILI data available to pipeline operators. Additionally, the service-agnostic framework supports the integration of process and service parameters, further enhancing the efficacy of machine learning models for corrosion prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100308"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil and gas pipelines are the primary means of fluid transportation in the industry due to their efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. However, pipeline corrosion poses significant risks, leading to loss of containment, operational interruptions, and potential loss of life if undetected or unmitigated. The introduction of novel and corrosive fluid, such as hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2), is expected to exacerbate corrosion-related issues. Consequently, pipeline inspection techniques, particularly in-line inspection (ILI), are increasingly vital for corrosion monitoring. This paper establishes a framework for utilizing ILI data to develop machine learning models for corrosion prediction. Four tree-based machine learning techniques—eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Dropouts meet multiple Additive Regression Trees (DART), Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM) with linear trees, and random forests—were employed to predict the maximum depth of corrosion defects based exclusively on historical ILI data. All models significantly outperformed the Naïve forecasting benchmark, with the best model achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.368 mm on the test set, surpassing the benchmark by 41.5 %. Furthermore, the accuracy of these models exceeded that of most service-based corrosion prediction models in the literature. This was achieved using an ILI dataset that exhibited extreme variations in maximum depth distribution and changes in reporting criteria. These findings indicate that the proposed framework is a superior alternative to service-based models, leveraging the vast amount of ILI data available to pipeline operators. Additionally, the service-agnostic framework supports the integration of process and service parameters, further enhancing the efficacy of machine learning models for corrosion prediction.

Abstract Image

基于历史在线检测数据预测腐蚀缺陷最大深度的树状机器学习模型
石油和天然气管道因其高效、可靠和成本效益而成为行业中流体输送的主要手段。然而,管道腐蚀带来了巨大的风险,如果不及时发现或不加以缓解,可能会导致密封泄漏、操作中断和潜在的生命损失。新型腐蚀性流体的引入,如氢气和二氧化碳(CO2),预计将加剧与腐蚀相关的问题。因此,管道检测技术,特别是在线检测(ILI),在腐蚀监测中变得越来越重要。本文建立了一个利用ILI数据开发用于腐蚀预测的机器学习模型的框架。四种基于树的机器学习技术——极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、Dropouts满足多重加性回归树(DART)、线性树的光梯度增强机(LightGBM)和随机森林——被用于仅基于历史ILI数据预测腐蚀缺陷的最大深度。所有模型都显著优于Naïve预测基准,其中最佳模型在测试集上的均方根误差(RMSE)为0.368 mm,超过基准41.5%。此外,这些模型的精度超过了文献中大多数基于服务的腐蚀预测模型。这是通过ILI数据集实现的,该数据集显示了最大深度分布的极端变化和报告标准的变化。这些研究结果表明,拟议的框架是基于服务的模型的一个更好的替代方案,利用了管道运营商可用的大量ILI数据。此外,服务不可知框架支持过程和服务参数的集成,进一步提高机器学习模型在腐蚀预测中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书