Seismic fragility in life cycle cost analysis for gas pipelines: design and cost optimization framework

IF 5 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Saeedeh Adineh, Behrouz Behnam, Ahmad Tahershamsi, Saeideh Farahani
{"title":"Seismic fragility in life cycle cost analysis for gas pipelines: design and cost optimization framework","authors":"Saeedeh Adineh,&nbsp;Behrouz Behnam,&nbsp;Ahmad Tahershamsi,&nbsp;Saeideh Farahani","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes an innovative approach to optimizing the seismic design of pipeline network by incorporating life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA). The research integrates seismic design, which includes evaluating wave propagation, with a comprehensive LCCA. The LCCA includes the calculation of both initial and secondary costs. Initial costs cover pipeline construction costs, such as materials and installation. Secondary costs include expected seismic loss and maintenance. The research involves modeling the pipeline using FEM, conducting incremental dynamic analyses, extracting seismic fragility curves, calculating expected seismic annual losses, and using a Markov corrosion model to simulate corrosion growth rates and calculate expected maintenance costs. The developed method is applied to a gas pipeline network, which includes varying diameters and thicknesses. Results indicate that among different scenarios, a slight increase in pipe wall thickness leads to a noticeable reduction in the secondary costs, achieving the minimum life-cycle costs (LCC) value. Among secondary costs, expected seismic loss are significantly higher than maintenance costs. However, increasing wall thickness has a greater impact on reducing maintenance costs. Among the various scenarios, those with the greatest wall thickness exhibit the lowest expected seismic loss, with the expected maintenance costs effectively reaching zero. As the diameter-to-wall-thickness ratio decreases, secondary costs decrease, while initial costs and LCC increase. For scenarios with diameter-to-wall-thickness ratios of 95 and 119, the optimum LCC is achieved. Also, the results show that with an increase in diameter of up to 50% and the same thickness, the LCC increases up to 60.63%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100299"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes an innovative approach to optimizing the seismic design of pipeline network by incorporating life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA). The research integrates seismic design, which includes evaluating wave propagation, with a comprehensive LCCA. The LCCA includes the calculation of both initial and secondary costs. Initial costs cover pipeline construction costs, such as materials and installation. Secondary costs include expected seismic loss and maintenance. The research involves modeling the pipeline using FEM, conducting incremental dynamic analyses, extracting seismic fragility curves, calculating expected seismic annual losses, and using a Markov corrosion model to simulate corrosion growth rates and calculate expected maintenance costs. The developed method is applied to a gas pipeline network, which includes varying diameters and thicknesses. Results indicate that among different scenarios, a slight increase in pipe wall thickness leads to a noticeable reduction in the secondary costs, achieving the minimum life-cycle costs (LCC) value. Among secondary costs, expected seismic loss are significantly higher than maintenance costs. However, increasing wall thickness has a greater impact on reducing maintenance costs. Among the various scenarios, those with the greatest wall thickness exhibit the lowest expected seismic loss, with the expected maintenance costs effectively reaching zero. As the diameter-to-wall-thickness ratio decreases, secondary costs decrease, while initial costs and LCC increase. For scenarios with diameter-to-wall-thickness ratios of 95 and 119, the optimum LCC is achieved. Also, the results show that with an increase in diameter of up to 50% and the same thickness, the LCC increases up to 60.63%.
天然气管道寿命周期成本分析中的地震易损性:设计与成本优化框架
本研究提出了一种结合全寿命周期成本分析(LCCA)来优化管网抗震设计的创新方法。该研究将包括波传播评估在内的抗震设计与综合LCCA相结合。LCCA包括初始成本和次级成本的计算。初始成本包括管道建设成本,如材料和安装。次要成本包括预期的地震损失和维护费用。研究包括使用FEM对管道进行建模,进行增量动态分析,提取地震易损性曲线,计算预计地震年损失,并使用马尔可夫腐蚀模型模拟腐蚀增长率并计算预期维护成本。将该方法应用于不同直径和厚度的燃气管网。结果表明,在不同情况下,管壁厚度的轻微增加可以显著降低二次成本,实现最小生命周期成本(LCC)值。在次要成本中,预期地震损失明显高于维护成本。然而,增加壁厚对降低维护成本的影响更大。在各种场景中,壁厚最大的场景表现出最低的预期地震损失,预期维护成本实际上为零。随着径壁比的减小,二次成本降低,初始成本和LCC增加。对于直径壁厚比为95和119的情况,可获得最佳LCC。结果表明,在厚度相同的情况下,直径增大50%,LCC增大60.63%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书