Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis

IF 17.1 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Journal of Advanced Research Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.037
Zhenzhen Guan, Yijin Wang, Shiyu Zhang, Yanyang Zhang, Liang Wang, Yixin Chen, Xuhua Lu
{"title":"Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis","authors":"Zhenzhen Guan,&nbsp;Yijin Wang,&nbsp;Shiyu Zhang,&nbsp;Yanyang Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Wang,&nbsp;Yixin Chen,&nbsp;Xuhua Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lumbar CT and MRI scans are helpful for osteoporosis (OP) screening. Deep learning enhances the efficiency and accuracy of musculoskeletal quantification for OP screening.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop a deep learning-based model (UNet3D) for musculoskeletal quantification from lumbar CT and MRI in OP patients, and to explore musculoskeletal relationship.</div></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><div>Retrospectively analyzing OP patients’ lumbar CT, MRI and DXA scans between January 2018 and August 2025 from two center, and UNet3D was developed based on U-Net to simultaneously segment L1-S1 vertebrae on CT and paraspinal muscles/intermuscular spaces on MRI. Performance was compared against U-Net, U<sup>2</sup>-Net, Mask-RCNN using pixel accuracy (PA), mean pixel accuracy (mPA), mean intersection over union (mIoU). Following automated HU values calculation within cancellous bone volume of interests (VOIs), we correlated L1-L4 HU values with T-scores and analyzed their relationship with muscle/space volumes across L1-S1, computing corresponding weighting coefficients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study analyzed 410 OP patients (65 ± 10 years; 240 women) with 76,700 axial CT and 6210 axial T2 slices, including training (266), validation (76), internal test (38) and external test (30) sets. On the internal test set, UNet3D’s accuracy in CT (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.984/0.849/0.760) and MRI (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.973/0.849/0.724), outperformed U-Net/U<sup>2</sup>-Net/Mask R-CNN. On the external test set, UNet3D attained PA, mPA, and mIoU values of 0.971, 0.852, 0.741 in CT, and of 0.969, 0.834, 0.713 in MRI. HU values varied across vertebral VOIs, ranging from 80.33 HU (L2) to 195.14 HU (S1), and correlations existed between L1-L4 HU values and T-scores (<em>r</em> ≥ 0.85, <em>P</em> < 0.05). Volumetric measurements across L1-S1 identified the psoas major as the largest muscle (173,317.68 mm<sup>3</sup>) and the quadratus lumborum as the smallest (65,167.78 mm<sup>3</sup>); among spaces, the psoas-vertebral was largest (124,301.86 mm<sup>3</sup>) and the quadratus lumborum-iliocostalis was smallest (29,676.63 mm<sup>3</sup>). Vertebral HU values correlated positively with muscle volumes (ω &gt; 0) and negatively with space volumes and fatty infiltration (ω &lt; 0).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UNet3D outperformed U-Net/U<sup>2</sup>-Net/Mask R-CNN on CT/MRI segmentation, enabling accurate musculoskeletal volume quantification in OP patients. Musculoskeletal correlations differed across spinal segments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14952,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 899-909"},"PeriodicalIF":17.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090123226000627","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lumbar CT and MRI scans are helpful for osteoporosis (OP) screening. Deep learning enhances the efficiency and accuracy of musculoskeletal quantification for OP screening.

Objectives

To develop a deep learning-based model (UNet3D) for musculoskeletal quantification from lumbar CT and MRI in OP patients, and to explore musculoskeletal relationship.

Materials

Retrospectively analyzing OP patients’ lumbar CT, MRI and DXA scans between January 2018 and August 2025 from two center, and UNet3D was developed based on U-Net to simultaneously segment L1-S1 vertebrae on CT and paraspinal muscles/intermuscular spaces on MRI. Performance was compared against U-Net, U2-Net, Mask-RCNN using pixel accuracy (PA), mean pixel accuracy (mPA), mean intersection over union (mIoU). Following automated HU values calculation within cancellous bone volume of interests (VOIs), we correlated L1-L4 HU values with T-scores and analyzed their relationship with muscle/space volumes across L1-S1, computing corresponding weighting coefficients.

Results

The study analyzed 410 OP patients (65 ± 10 years; 240 women) with 76,700 axial CT and 6210 axial T2 slices, including training (266), validation (76), internal test (38) and external test (30) sets. On the internal test set, UNet3D’s accuracy in CT (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.984/0.849/0.760) and MRI (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.973/0.849/0.724), outperformed U-Net/U2-Net/Mask R-CNN. On the external test set, UNet3D attained PA, mPA, and mIoU values of 0.971, 0.852, 0.741 in CT, and of 0.969, 0.834, 0.713 in MRI. HU values varied across vertebral VOIs, ranging from 80.33 HU (L2) to 195.14 HU (S1), and correlations existed between L1-L4 HU values and T-scores (r ≥ 0.85, P < 0.05). Volumetric measurements across L1-S1 identified the psoas major as the largest muscle (173,317.68 mm3) and the quadratus lumborum as the smallest (65,167.78 mm3); among spaces, the psoas-vertebral was largest (124,301.86 mm3) and the quadratus lumborum-iliocostalis was smallest (29,676.63 mm3). Vertebral HU values correlated positively with muscle volumes (ω > 0) and negatively with space volumes and fatty infiltration (ω < 0).

Conclusion

UNet3D outperformed U-Net/U2-Net/Mask R-CNN on CT/MRI segmentation, enabling accurate musculoskeletal volume quantification in OP patients. Musculoskeletal correlations differed across spinal segments.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习的肌肉骨骼定量模型构建及骨质疏松症患者肌肉骨骼关系研究
腰椎CT和MRI扫描有助于骨质疏松症(OP)的筛查。深度学习提高了OP筛选中肌肉骨骼量化的效率和准确性。目的建立一种基于深度学习的模型(UNet3D),用于OP患者腰椎CT和MRI的肌肉骨骼量化,并探讨肌肉骨骼之间的关系。回顾性分析2018年1月至2025年8月OP患者两中心腰椎CT、MRI和DXA扫描,基于U-Net开发UNet3D,在CT上同时分割L1-S1椎体,在MRI上同时分割棘旁肌/肌间隙。使用像素精度(PA)、平均像素精度(mPA)、平均交联(mIoU)与U-Net、U2-Net、Mask-RCNN进行性能比较。在松质骨感兴趣体积(VOIs)内自动计算HU值后,我们将L1-L4 HU值与t分数关联,并分析它们与L1-S1间肌肉/空间体积的关系,计算相应的加权系数。结果本研究分析了410例OP患者(65例 ± 10 岁;240例女性)76,700张轴向CT和6030张轴向T2片,包括训练组(266组)、验证组(76组)、内测组(38组)和外测组(30组)。在内部测试集中,UNet3D在CT (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.984/0.849/0.760)和MRI (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.973/0.849/0.724)上的准确率优于U-Net/U2-Net/Mask R-CNN。在外部测试集中,UNet3D在CT上获得的PA、mPA、mIoU值分别为0.971、0.852、0.741,在MRI上获得的PA、mPA、mIoU值分别为0.969、0.834、0.713。不同椎体VOIs的HU值变化范围为80.33 HU (L2) ~ 195.14 HU (S1), l1 ~ l4 HU值与t评分存在相关性(r ≥ 0.85,P < 0.05)。L1-S1的体积测量确定腰大肌是最大的肌肉(173,317.68 mm3),腰方肌是最小的肌肉(65,167.78 mm3);其中腰肌-椎体最大(124,301.86 mm3),腰方肌-髂肋肌最小(29,676.63 mm3)。椎体HU值与肌肉体积呈正相关(ω >; 0),与间隙体积和脂肪浸润呈负相关(ω <; 0)。结论unet3d在CT/MRI分割上优于U-Net/U2-Net/Mask R-CNN,能够准确定量OP患者的肌肉骨骼体积。不同脊柱节段的肌肉骨骼相关性不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Research
Journal of Advanced Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
280
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Research (J. Adv. Res.) is an applied/natural sciences, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on interdisciplinary research. The journal aims to contribute to applied research and knowledge worldwide through the publication of original and high-quality research articles in the fields of Medicine, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dentistry, Physical Therapy, Veterinary Medicine, and Basic and Biological Sciences. The following abstracting and indexing services cover the Journal of Advanced Research: PubMed/Medline, Essential Science Indicators, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed Central, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书