An overview of the institutionalization of nature-based solutions in Brazilian cities

IF 8.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129308
Fabiana Wütrich , Loan Diep , Tatiana Maria Cecy Gadda
{"title":"An overview of the institutionalization of nature-based solutions in Brazilian cities","authors":"Fabiana Wütrich ,&nbsp;Loan Diep ,&nbsp;Tatiana Maria Cecy Gadda","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are gaining visibility in Brazil as a strategy for rethinking urban development, their institutionalization within municipal frameworks remains poorly understood. This article provides the first nationwide mapping of NbS integration into local governance, analyzing 903 legal norms across 389 municipalities. Results show that NbS institutionalization is recent (mostly post-2020) and uneven, favoring specific strategies such as green roofs, urban forests, and rain gardens over the umbrella term “NbS.” Geographically, norms are concentrated in the Southeast and South, while the North—home to the Amazon—remains scarcely represented. Although larger cities show higher adoption rates, medium-sized municipalities lead in legislative output. Ordinary laws dominate the legal landscape, while complementary laws and master plans offer stronger integration opportunities. The study also identifies “NbS Champions,” a group of municipalities that have institutionalized multiple strategies. Crucially, these findings establish a baseline for monitoring the impact of emerging federal frameworks, such as the National Urban Afforestation Plan (PlaNAU), while highlighting the strategic role of local governments as autonomous drivers of bottom-up innovation for climate resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 129308"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866726000488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are gaining visibility in Brazil as a strategy for rethinking urban development, their institutionalization within municipal frameworks remains poorly understood. This article provides the first nationwide mapping of NbS integration into local governance, analyzing 903 legal norms across 389 municipalities. Results show that NbS institutionalization is recent (mostly post-2020) and uneven, favoring specific strategies such as green roofs, urban forests, and rain gardens over the umbrella term “NbS.” Geographically, norms are concentrated in the Southeast and South, while the North—home to the Amazon—remains scarcely represented. Although larger cities show higher adoption rates, medium-sized municipalities lead in legislative output. Ordinary laws dominate the legal landscape, while complementary laws and master plans offer stronger integration opportunities. The study also identifies “NbS Champions,” a group of municipalities that have institutionalized multiple strategies. Crucially, these findings establish a baseline for monitoring the impact of emerging federal frameworks, such as the National Urban Afforestation Plan (PlaNAU), while highlighting the strategic role of local governments as autonomous drivers of bottom-up innovation for climate resilience.
巴西城市中基于自然的解决方案的制度化概述
尽管基于自然的解决方案(NbS)作为一种重新思考城市发展的战略在巴西越来越受关注,但人们对其在市政框架内的制度化仍知之甚少。本文首次在全国范围内绘制了国家统计局融入地方治理的地图,分析了389个城市的903项法律规范。结果表明,国家统计局的制度化是最近的(主要是在2020年之后),而且不均衡,更倾向于绿色屋顶、城市森林和雨水花园等具体战略,而不是“国家统计局”这个总称。从地理上看,规范集中在东南部和南部,而北部——亚马逊的所在地——几乎没有代表。虽然大城市的采用率更高,但中型城市在立法产出方面领先。普通法在法律格局中占主导地位,而补充性法律和总体规划提供了更强的一体化机会。该研究还确定了“国家统计局冠军”,这是一组将多种战略制度化的城市。至关重要的是,这些发现为监测新兴联邦框架(如国家城市造林计划(PlaNAU))的影响建立了基线,同时强调了地方政府作为自下而上的气候适应能力创新的自主驱动者的战略作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书