Ronny Scherer , Diego G. Campos , Tim Fütterer , Fazilat Siddiq
{"title":"Unraveling gender disparities in teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A large-scale meta-analytic review","authors":"Ronny Scherer , Diego G. Campos , Tim Fütterer , Fazilat Siddiq","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This large-scale meta-analytic review investigates gender disparities in pre- and in-service K-12 teachers' Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy and performance. Synthesizing 915 effect sizes from 102 primary studies and 420 teacher samples (<em>N</em> = 681,745 teachers) in 70 countries via multilevel meta-analyses, we found small but significant gender differences favoring male teachers in TPACK self-efficacy (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>d</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> = −0.17), particularly in technological knowledge (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>d</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> = −0.31) and technological pedagogical knowledge (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>d</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> = −0.14). However, no significant gender disparities were observed in TPACK performance (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>d</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> = −0.08). Our findings revealed considerable heterogeneity in these effects across samples, studies, countries, measures, and over time, which could be partly explained by factors such as educational level, country-level gender inequality, and economic development. These results do not support male teachers’ advantage in all aspects of technology-related teaching competencies. Our meta-analytic review further implies that gender disparities in TPACK vary across contexts or over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100765"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X26000047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This large-scale meta-analytic review investigates gender disparities in pre- and in-service K-12 teachers' Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy and performance. Synthesizing 915 effect sizes from 102 primary studies and 420 teacher samples (N = 681,745 teachers) in 70 countries via multilevel meta-analyses, we found small but significant gender differences favoring male teachers in TPACK self-efficacy ( = −0.17), particularly in technological knowledge ( = −0.31) and technological pedagogical knowledge ( = −0.14). However, no significant gender disparities were observed in TPACK performance ( = −0.08). Our findings revealed considerable heterogeneity in these effects across samples, studies, countries, measures, and over time, which could be partly explained by factors such as educational level, country-level gender inequality, and economic development. These results do not support male teachers’ advantage in all aspects of technology-related teaching competencies. Our meta-analytic review further implies that gender disparities in TPACK vary across contexts or over time.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.