Effects of reward strategies in gamified learning on academic performance: A systematic review

IF 10.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100766
Shurui Bai , Yingxue Liu , Khe Foon Hew , Michael Sailer , Ya Xiao
{"title":"Effects of reward strategies in gamified learning on academic performance: A systematic review","authors":"Shurui Bai ,&nbsp;Yingxue Liu ,&nbsp;Khe Foon Hew ,&nbsp;Michael Sailer ,&nbsp;Ya Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tangible rewards, such as class participation scores, are often incorporated into gamified learning to motivate students. This systematic review synthesised evidence from 16 studies with 18 independent interventions to examine how tangible rewards have been designed and implemented in gamified learning and how they relate to academic performance. Across the studies, tangible rewards varied widely in form, contingency and stakes, ranging from small tokens and badges to extra course grades. The result found that the “exceeding a norm” reward contingency with “low-stakes rewards” associates with more positive academic performance in gamified classes. Based on qualitative insights, good reward administration practices include giving students autonomy in choosing rewards and recognizing learning progress with playful elements (e.g., Lego bricks). However, due to the limited number of interventions, more empirical evidence is needed to clarify whether and under what conditions tangible rewards can enhance academic performance in gamified learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100766"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X26000059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tangible rewards, such as class participation scores, are often incorporated into gamified learning to motivate students. This systematic review synthesised evidence from 16 studies with 18 independent interventions to examine how tangible rewards have been designed and implemented in gamified learning and how they relate to academic performance. Across the studies, tangible rewards varied widely in form, contingency and stakes, ranging from small tokens and badges to extra course grades. The result found that the “exceeding a norm” reward contingency with “low-stakes rewards” associates with more positive academic performance in gamified classes. Based on qualitative insights, good reward administration practices include giving students autonomy in choosing rewards and recognizing learning progress with playful elements (e.g., Lego bricks). However, due to the limited number of interventions, more empirical evidence is needed to clarify whether and under what conditions tangible rewards can enhance academic performance in gamified learning.
游戏化学习中奖励策略对学习成绩影响的系统研究
有形的奖励,如课堂参与分数,经常被纳入游戏化学习,以激励学生。该系统综述综合了来自16项研究和18项独立干预措施的证据,以检查在游戏化学习中如何设计和实施有形奖励,以及它们与学习成绩的关系。在这些研究中,有形奖励的形式、偶然性和利害关系各不相同,从小的代币和徽章到额外的课程成绩。结果发现,在游戏化课程中,带有“低风险奖励”的“超出标准”奖励偶然性与更积极的学习成绩有关。基于定性的见解,良好的奖励管理实践包括给予学生选择奖励的自主权,并通过有趣的元素(例如乐高积木)来识别学习进展。然而,由于干预措施的数量有限,需要更多的经验证据来阐明有形奖励是否以及在什么条件下可以提高游戏化学习中的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书