CoMPaseD: advanced planning of proteomic experiments aiming to identify small proteins.

microLife Pub Date : 2026-01-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/femsml/uqaf043
Jürgen Bartel, Philipp T Kaulich, Borja Ferrero-Bordera, Rick Gelhausen, Rolf Backofen, Andreas Tholey, Sandra Maaß
{"title":"CoMPaseD: advanced planning of proteomic experiments aiming to identify small proteins.","authors":"Jürgen Bartel, Philipp T Kaulich, Borja Ferrero-Bordera, Rick Gelhausen, Rolf Backofen, Andreas Tholey, Sandra Maaß","doi":"10.1093/femsml/uqaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In proteome studies, the application of alternative proteases, exclusively or in addition to trypsin, often increases protein sequence or proteome coverage. It has recently been shown that, in particular, the analysis of small proteins benefits from such multi-protease approaches. However, selecting the most optimal combination of proteases either requires laboursome experiments or the decision of an experienced user, which might be biased. In this manuscript, we present a protease score that enables the objective comparison of multiple-protease digestions and a Python-based tool named CoMPaseD (Comparison of Multiple Protease  Digestions), which utilizes Monte-Carlo simulations to predict this score for a user-defined set of proteases and any combination of these. By analysis of the small proteomes of the two model organisms <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and <i>Methanosarcina mazei</i> with five proteases and different experimental setups, we demonstrate a good correlation between experimentally derived and predicted scores. This highlights the broad applicability of CoMPaseD, which can effectively guide the selection of proteases to enhance the characterization of specific subsets of the proteome, e.g. based on factors such as protein size, localization or isoelectric point. CoMPaseD is freely available at <i>https://github.com/MicrobialProteomics/CoMPaseD</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":74189,"journal":{"name":"microLife","volume":"7 ","pages":"uqaf043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"microLife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsml/uqaf043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In proteome studies, the application of alternative proteases, exclusively or in addition to trypsin, often increases protein sequence or proteome coverage. It has recently been shown that, in particular, the analysis of small proteins benefits from such multi-protease approaches. However, selecting the most optimal combination of proteases either requires laboursome experiments or the decision of an experienced user, which might be biased. In this manuscript, we present a protease score that enables the objective comparison of multiple-protease digestions and a Python-based tool named CoMPaseD (Comparison of Multiple Protease  Digestions), which utilizes Monte-Carlo simulations to predict this score for a user-defined set of proteases and any combination of these. By analysis of the small proteomes of the two model organisms Bacillus subtilis and Methanosarcina mazei with five proteases and different experimental setups, we demonstrate a good correlation between experimentally derived and predicted scores. This highlights the broad applicability of CoMPaseD, which can effectively guide the selection of proteases to enhance the characterization of specific subsets of the proteome, e.g. based on factors such as protein size, localization or isoelectric point. CoMPaseD is freely available at https://github.com/MicrobialProteomics/CoMPaseD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CoMPaseD:先进的蛋白质组学实验计划,旨在识别小蛋白。
在蛋白质组学研究中,除了胰蛋白酶外,还应用其他蛋白酶,通常会增加蛋白质序列或蛋白质组的覆盖范围。最近的研究表明,特别是小蛋白的分析受益于这种多蛋白酶方法。然而,选择最优的蛋白酶组合要么需要艰苦的实验,要么需要经验丰富的用户的决定,这可能是有偏见的。在这篇手稿中,我们提出了一个蛋白酶评分,它可以客观地比较多种蛋白酶消化和一个基于python的工具,名为CoMPaseD(多种蛋白酶消化的比较),它利用蒙特卡罗模拟来预测用户定义的蛋白酶集和这些的任何组合的得分。通过对两种模式生物枯草芽孢杆菌和mathanosarcina mazei的小蛋白质组学分析,在不同的实验设置和5种蛋白酶下,我们证明了实验推导和预测得分之间的良好相关性。这凸显了CoMPaseD的广泛适用性,它可以有效地指导蛋白酶的选择,以增强对蛋白质组特定亚群的表征,例如基于蛋白质大小、定位或等电点等因素。CoMPaseD可以在https://github.com/MicrobialProteomics/CoMPaseD免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书