Variability in the application of patient blood management programs in the Iberian peninsula

J.A. García Erce , F. Sabio , C. Jericó , S. Isabel Jorge , M. Quintana Díaz , D. Castro Paupério
{"title":"Variability in the application of patient blood management programs in the Iberian peninsula","authors":"J.A. García Erce ,&nbsp;F. Sabio ,&nbsp;C. Jericó ,&nbsp;S. Isabel Jorge ,&nbsp;M. Quintana Díaz ,&nbsp;D. Castro Paupério","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2026.502017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for global implementation of Patient Blood Management (PBM) programs to optimize transfusion practices and reduce variability in blood utilization. This study examines the evolution of red cell, platelet, and plasma consumption in Iberia (Spain and Portugal), comparing trends within the region and with European benchmarks like the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>National transfusion activity reports from Spain, Portugal, the United Kingdom (2011–2023) were analyzed. Key metrics included transfusion rates per 1,000 inhabitants for red cells, platelets, and fresh frozen plasma. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal–Wallis tests and ANOVA to identify differences between countries and over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2011 to 2023, red cell transfusion rates decreased by 30% in the UK, 6% in Spain, and 15% in Portugal. Germany showed a modest decline, while Italy maintained stable rates exceeding 40 units per 1,000 inhabitants. Platelet and plasma consumption exhibited distinct patterns, with Portugal showing a steeper decline compared to Spain, and the UK maintaining the lowest overall rates. Platelet consume is clearly increasing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The analysis reveals significant differences in blood component utilization across Iberia and Europe, reflecting varying levels of PBM adoption. Despite WHO and Council of Europe recommendations, Iberian countries lag behind the UK in reducing red cell transfusion rates. These findings underscore the need for uniform PBM implementation to harmonize practices and optimize resource use, not only Red Cell Concentrates. The creation of the Iberian task-force (section of the Ibero-American PBM Society (SIAPBM) could be an opportunity to create the necessary awareness in our countries and become a meeting point between America and Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":"73 2","pages":"Article 502017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341192926000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for global implementation of Patient Blood Management (PBM) programs to optimize transfusion practices and reduce variability in blood utilization. This study examines the evolution of red cell, platelet, and plasma consumption in Iberia (Spain and Portugal), comparing trends within the region and with European benchmarks like the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy.

Methods

National transfusion activity reports from Spain, Portugal, the United Kingdom (2011–2023) were analyzed. Key metrics included transfusion rates per 1,000 inhabitants for red cells, platelets, and fresh frozen plasma. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal–Wallis tests and ANOVA to identify differences between countries and over time.

Results

From 2011 to 2023, red cell transfusion rates decreased by 30% in the UK, 6% in Spain, and 15% in Portugal. Germany showed a modest decline, while Italy maintained stable rates exceeding 40 units per 1,000 inhabitants. Platelet and plasma consumption exhibited distinct patterns, with Portugal showing a steeper decline compared to Spain, and the UK maintaining the lowest overall rates. Platelet consume is clearly increasing.

Conclusions

The analysis reveals significant differences in blood component utilization across Iberia and Europe, reflecting varying levels of PBM adoption. Despite WHO and Council of Europe recommendations, Iberian countries lag behind the UK in reducing red cell transfusion rates. These findings underscore the need for uniform PBM implementation to harmonize practices and optimize resource use, not only Red Cell Concentrates. The creation of the Iberian task-force (section of the Ibero-American PBM Society (SIAPBM) could be an opportunity to create the necessary awareness in our countries and become a meeting point between America and Europe.
伊比利亚半岛患者血液管理方案应用的可变性。
背景:2010年,世界卫生组织(WHO)呼吁全球实施患者血液管理(PBM)计划,以优化输血实践并减少血液利用的可变性。本研究考察了伊比利亚半岛(西班牙和葡萄牙)红细胞、血小板和血浆消耗的演变,并将该地区的趋势与英国、德国和意大利等欧洲基准进行了比较。方法:分析西班牙、葡萄牙和英国2011-2023年国家输血活动报告。关键指标包括每1000名居民中红细胞、血小板和新鲜冷冻血浆的输血率。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和方差分析进行统计分析,以确定国家之间和时间之间的差异。结果:从2011年到2023年,英国的红细胞输注率下降了30%,西班牙下降了6%,葡萄牙下降了15%。德国出现了小幅下降,而意大利保持了稳定的比率,超过每1000名居民40个单位。血小板和血浆消耗表现出不同的模式,与西班牙相比,葡萄牙的下降幅度更大,而英国保持最低的总体比率。血小板消耗明显增加。结论:分析揭示了伊比利亚和欧洲血液成分利用率的显著差异,反映了不同水平的PBM采用。尽管世卫组织和欧洲委员会提出了建议,但伊比利亚国家在降低红细胞输血率方面落后于英国。这些发现强调了统一PBM实施的必要性,以协调实践和优化资源利用,而不仅仅是红细胞浓缩物。伊比利亚特别工作组(伊比利亚-美洲PBM协会(SIAPBM)的一部分)的成立可能是一个在我们各国建立必要意识的机会,并成为美洲和欧洲之间的交汇点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书