Electrophysiological correlates of cognitive reserve in healthy older adults at different cognitive states.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alina Zhunussova, Maria Concetta Pellicciari, Manuel Carreiras, Jesús Cespón
{"title":"Electrophysiological correlates of cognitive reserve in healthy older adults at different cognitive states.","authors":"Alina Zhunussova, Maria Concetta Pellicciari, Manuel Carreiras, Jesús Cespón","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01384-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High cognitive reserve (CR) is associated with a set of lifestyle factors such as high education level and occupational attainment. Studies suggest that CR is linked to enhanced executive control functions. Nevertheless, it is unclear what functional neural activity patterns are linked to high CR and to what extent they are steady across different cognitive states. The aim of the present study was to investigate electrophysiological differences between low CR (LCR) and high CR (HCR) at rest and during the performance of two cognitive control tasks with different difficulty level. Thus, 67 older adults performed an experimental session consisting of two spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) tasks (i.e., the Simon task, and the more demanding spatial Stroop task), and a resting state during an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. Cognitive control was better in the HCR than in the LCR group, as revealed by higher accuracy in the HCR compared to the LCR group in incongruent conditions of the tasks. Moreover, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) showed earlier latencies (P300) in HCR than LCR and time/frequency analysis showed higher alpha activity in HCR than LCR during the performance of the tasks, while no differences were observed at rest within any of the analyzed frequency bands. Higher P300 frontalization was observed in LCR than HCR in the more difficult task but it was not related to frontalization within a specific frequency band. Overall, results showed that electrophysiological differences between high and low CR depend on the cognitive state, with greater CR-related differences emerging at increased task demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1556-1576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01384-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High cognitive reserve (CR) is associated with a set of lifestyle factors such as high education level and occupational attainment. Studies suggest that CR is linked to enhanced executive control functions. Nevertheless, it is unclear what functional neural activity patterns are linked to high CR and to what extent they are steady across different cognitive states. The aim of the present study was to investigate electrophysiological differences between low CR (LCR) and high CR (HCR) at rest and during the performance of two cognitive control tasks with different difficulty level. Thus, 67 older adults performed an experimental session consisting of two spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) tasks (i.e., the Simon task, and the more demanding spatial Stroop task), and a resting state during an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. Cognitive control was better in the HCR than in the LCR group, as revealed by higher accuracy in the HCR compared to the LCR group in incongruent conditions of the tasks. Moreover, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) showed earlier latencies (P300) in HCR than LCR and time/frequency analysis showed higher alpha activity in HCR than LCR during the performance of the tasks, while no differences were observed at rest within any of the analyzed frequency bands. Higher P300 frontalization was observed in LCR than HCR in the more difficult task but it was not related to frontalization within a specific frequency band. Overall, results showed that electrophysiological differences between high and low CR depend on the cognitive state, with greater CR-related differences emerging at increased task demands.

不同认知状态下健康老年人认知储备的电生理相关性
高认知储备(CR)与高学历、职业成就等一系列生活方式因素有关。研究表明,CR与执行控制功能的增强有关。然而,目前尚不清楚哪些功能性神经活动模式与高CR相关,以及它们在不同认知状态下的稳定程度。本研究旨在探讨低CR (LCR)和高CR (HCR)在静止和执行两种不同难度认知控制任务时的电生理差异。因此,67名老年人进行了一个由两个空间刺激-反应相容性(SRC)任务(即Simon任务和要求更高的空间Stroop任务)组成的实验会话,并在脑电图(EEG)记录期间处于静息状态。HCR组的认知控制优于LCR组,在任务不一致条件下,HCR组的准确性高于LCR组。此外,事件相关脑电位(ERPs)显示HCR比LCR更早的潜伏期(P300),时间/频率分析显示,在任务执行期间,HCR的α活动高于LCR,而在任何分析频带内均未观察到休息时的差异。在难度较高的任务中,LCR组的P300额化程度高于HCR组,但在特定频带内与P300额化程度无关。总体而言,研究结果表明,高CR和低CR之间的电生理差异取决于认知状态,在任务需求增加时,CR相关差异更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书