Integrating Multiple Roles: The Social Context of Spousal Cancer Caregiving.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Dana Ketcher, Rachael McCormick Stickler, Amy K Otto, Maija Reblin
{"title":"Integrating Multiple Roles: The Social Context of Spousal Cancer Caregiving.","authors":"Dana Ketcher, Rachael McCormick Stickler, Amy K Otto, Maija Reblin","doi":"10.1111/scs.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer family caregiving is a growing issue in the US. Several widely used conceptual models focused on the cancer caregiving experience highlight the importance of context as a mechanism for how the care experience impacts caregiver and patient outcomes. However, fewer studies explore how the existing social context, including pre-existing roles and prior experiences with care, can impact conceptualisation of a current caregiving role.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to identify how spouse caregivers frame their caregiving role and experience within their existing roles and social contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary qualitative analysis using a hybrid approach of deductive and inductive coding to identify themes in interviews from spouses of patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews from 30 heterosexual spousal caregivers were analysed. Most caregivers were White (87%) and female (83%), with a mean age of 66.63 (SD = 10.29) years. Caregiving experiences were contextualised within the following themes: caregiving role within a spousal role, formative experiences and social interactions and influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers' various roles, including that of spouse, and prior experiences and interactions helped them to make sense of their caregiving role, create meaning and help shape expectations. Our analysis works towards a more nuanced, complex integration of caregiving history and its role in a broader social context. Future work should continue to explore specific contextual aspects of caregiving; a broader ecological model of caregiving could be useful in theory and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":"e70174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer family caregiving is a growing issue in the US. Several widely used conceptual models focused on the cancer caregiving experience highlight the importance of context as a mechanism for how the care experience impacts caregiver and patient outcomes. However, fewer studies explore how the existing social context, including pre-existing roles and prior experiences with care, can impact conceptualisation of a current caregiving role.

Purpose: Our goal was to identify how spouse caregivers frame their caregiving role and experience within their existing roles and social contexts.

Methods: We performed a secondary qualitative analysis using a hybrid approach of deductive and inductive coding to identify themes in interviews from spouses of patients with advanced cancer.

Results: Interviews from 30 heterosexual spousal caregivers were analysed. Most caregivers were White (87%) and female (83%), with a mean age of 66.63 (SD = 10.29) years. Caregiving experiences were contextualised within the following themes: caregiving role within a spousal role, formative experiences and social interactions and influence.

Conclusions: Caregivers' various roles, including that of spouse, and prior experiences and interactions helped them to make sense of their caregiving role, create meaning and help shape expectations. Our analysis works towards a more nuanced, complex integration of caregiving history and its role in a broader social context. Future work should continue to explore specific contextual aspects of caregiving; a broader ecological model of caregiving could be useful in theory and practice.

多重角色整合:配偶癌症照护的社会背景。
在美国,癌症家庭护理是一个日益严重的问题。几个广泛使用的概念模型集中在癌症护理经验强调环境的重要性,作为一个机制,如何护理经验影响照顾者和患者的结果。然而,很少有研究探讨现有的社会背景,包括预先存在的角色和先前的护理经验,如何影响当前护理角色的概念化。目的:我们的目标是确定配偶照顾者如何在他们现有的角色和社会背景下构建他们的照顾角色和经验。方法:我们使用演绎和归纳编码的混合方法进行二次定性分析,以确定晚期癌症患者配偶的访谈主题。结果:对30名异性配偶照顾者的访谈进行分析。照顾者以白人(87%)和女性(83%)居多,平均年龄66.63岁(SD = 10.29)。看护经历在以下主题中被语境化:配偶角色中的看护角色,形成经历和社会互动和影响。结论:照顾者的不同角色,包括配偶的角色,以及先前的经历和互动,有助于他们理解自己的照顾角色,创造意义并帮助塑造期望。我们的分析是对看护历史及其在更广泛的社会背景下的作用进行更细致、更复杂的整合。未来的工作应继续探索护理的具体背景方面;一个更广泛的护理生态模型在理论和实践中都是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书