The Role of Research Facilitation Positions in Health Services: A Scoping Review

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Caitlin Brandenburg, Rachel Brimelow, Angela T. Chang, Kylie Matthews-Rensch, Iona Van Der Wiel, Shona Van Garderen, Hannah Mayr
{"title":"The Role of Research Facilitation Positions in Health Services: A Scoping Review","authors":"Caitlin Brandenburg,&nbsp;Rachel Brimelow,&nbsp;Angela T. Chang,&nbsp;Kylie Matthews-Rensch,&nbsp;Iona Van Der Wiel,&nbsp;Shona Van Garderen,&nbsp;Hannah Mayr","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research facilitation (RF) positions are a developing workforce in health services. This review aimed to map the available research literature and summarise findings related to the role and impact of RF positions in healthcare settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review was conducted using three inclusion criteria. (1) Population: Articles about RF positions; (2) Concept: Articles that describe the roles and duties of RF positions, and/or report how their impact is evaluated; (3) Context: RF positions employed by, or have a significant role within, health services. Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL electronic databases were searched in June 2022 for records from 2000-present. Full text articles published in English were included. Data were extracted regarding the structure, responsibilities, and evaluation of RF positions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen articles were included, representing 86 RF positions. Most positions were orientated to support nursing or allied health research. Position titles and structure varied widely. Whilst key responsibilities were highly heterogeneous, almost all included providing direct support to health service staff to engage in research, and many included facilitating research education. A range of measures were used to evaluate RF positions, with traditional academic outputs such as publications and grants most frequent. Quantitative evidence of the impact of RF positions was weak, though positive. Qualitative evaluations revealed the important role of RF positions in research capacity and evidence-based practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>RF positions provided a wide variety of supports to clinicians and health services. While there is some positive evidence of the value of RF positions, further research is needed on their structure and outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":"41 2","pages":"397-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research facilitation (RF) positions are a developing workforce in health services. This review aimed to map the available research literature and summarise findings related to the role and impact of RF positions in healthcare settings.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted using three inclusion criteria. (1) Population: Articles about RF positions; (2) Concept: Articles that describe the roles and duties of RF positions, and/or report how their impact is evaluated; (3) Context: RF positions employed by, or have a significant role within, health services. Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL electronic databases were searched in June 2022 for records from 2000-present. Full text articles published in English were included. Data were extracted regarding the structure, responsibilities, and evaluation of RF positions.

Results

Eighteen articles were included, representing 86 RF positions. Most positions were orientated to support nursing or allied health research. Position titles and structure varied widely. Whilst key responsibilities were highly heterogeneous, almost all included providing direct support to health service staff to engage in research, and many included facilitating research education. A range of measures were used to evaluate RF positions, with traditional academic outputs such as publications and grants most frequent. Quantitative evidence of the impact of RF positions was weak, though positive. Qualitative evaluations revealed the important role of RF positions in research capacity and evidence-based practice.

Conclusion

RF positions provided a wide variety of supports to clinicians and health services. While there is some positive evidence of the value of RF positions, further research is needed on their structure and outcomes.

研究促进职位在卫生服务中的作用:范围审查。
背景:研究促进(RF)职位是卫生服务领域发展中的劳动力。本综述旨在绘制现有的研究文献,并总结与RF位置在医疗保健环境中的作用和影响相关的发现。方法:采用三个纳入标准进行范围审查。(1)人口:关于RF职位的文章;(2)概念:描述RF职位的角色和职责,和/或报告如何评估其影响的文章;(3)背景:卫生服务部门雇用或在卫生服务部门发挥重要作用的RF职位。于2022年6月检索Medline、EMBASE和CINAHL电子数据库,检索2000年至今的记录。收录了以英文发表的文章全文。提取有关射频职位的结构、职责和评估的数据。结果:共纳入18篇文章,代表86个RF位置。大多数职位面向支持护理或相关健康研究。职位头衔和结构变化很大。虽然主要职责各不相同,但几乎所有职责都包括为卫生服务人员从事研究提供直接支助,许多职责还包括促进研究教育。使用了一系列措施来评估RF职位,最常见的是传统的学术产出,如出版物和赠款。射频位置的影响的定量证据虽然是积极的,但很弱。定性评价揭示了RF职位在研究能力和循证实践中的重要作用。结论:射频位置为临床医生和卫生服务提供了广泛的支持。虽然有一些积极的证据表明射频位置的价值,但需要对其结构和结果进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书