Normal ADC values at term equivalent age in the newborn: Comparison between term and very preterm infants.

IF 1.2 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI:10.1177/19714009261417574
Katsumi Hayakawa, Koichi Tanda, Masakazu Nishimoto, Akira Nishimura, Daisuke Kinoshita, Yuko Sano, Kei Yamada
{"title":"Normal ADC values at term equivalent age in the newborn: Comparison between term and very preterm infants.","authors":"Katsumi Hayakawa, Koichi Tanda, Masakazu Nishimoto, Akira Nishimura, Daisuke Kinoshita, Yuko Sano, Kei Yamada","doi":"10.1177/19714009261417574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeOnly limited studies have directly compared apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at term-equivalent age (TEA) between normal term infants and very preterm infants. We hypothesized that regional ADC values at TEA would differ between preterm infants and term infants, even in the absence of MRI-detectable brain injury. The purpose of this study was to compare ADC values at TEA between term infants and preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks of gestation.Subjects and methodsThis retrospective study enrolled consecutive infants who underwent neonatal brain MRI over a 7-year period from 2016 to 2022. From this cohort, very preterm infants were selected after confirmation of normal MRI findings and normal neurodevelopmental outcomes. ADC values were measured at six predefined brain regions. ADC values were compared between term infants and preterm infants, and further subgroup analyses were performed among term, very preterm, and extremely preterm infants.ResultsADC values at the basal ganglia were significantly higher in preterm infants compared with term infants. No significant differences were observed at the other five brain regions. Subgroup analysis among term, very preterm, and extremely preterm infants demonstrated significant differences in basal ganglia ADC values, with both very preterm and extremely preterm infants showing higher ADC values than term infants.ConclusionADC values at the basal ganglia at TEA were significantly higher in preterm infants than in term infants, despite normal conventional MRI findings and favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes. These findings suggest region-specific differences in brain microstructural maturation associated with preterm birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"636-641"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009261417574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeOnly limited studies have directly compared apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at term-equivalent age (TEA) between normal term infants and very preterm infants. We hypothesized that regional ADC values at TEA would differ between preterm infants and term infants, even in the absence of MRI-detectable brain injury. The purpose of this study was to compare ADC values at TEA between term infants and preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks of gestation.Subjects and methodsThis retrospective study enrolled consecutive infants who underwent neonatal brain MRI over a 7-year period from 2016 to 2022. From this cohort, very preterm infants were selected after confirmation of normal MRI findings and normal neurodevelopmental outcomes. ADC values were measured at six predefined brain regions. ADC values were compared between term infants and preterm infants, and further subgroup analyses were performed among term, very preterm, and extremely preterm infants.ResultsADC values at the basal ganglia were significantly higher in preterm infants compared with term infants. No significant differences were observed at the other five brain regions. Subgroup analysis among term, very preterm, and extremely preterm infants demonstrated significant differences in basal ganglia ADC values, with both very preterm and extremely preterm infants showing higher ADC values than term infants.ConclusionADC values at the basal ganglia at TEA were significantly higher in preterm infants than in term infants, despite normal conventional MRI findings and favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes. These findings suggest region-specific differences in brain microstructural maturation associated with preterm birth.

新生儿足月等值年龄正常ADC值:足月和极早产儿的比较。
只有有限的研究直接比较了正常足月婴儿和极早产儿足月等效年龄(TEA)的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。我们假设,即使在没有mri检测到脑损伤的情况下,TEA的区域ADC值在早产儿和足月婴儿之间也会有所不同。本研究的目的是比较足月儿和小于32周的早产儿在TEA时的ADC值。研究对象和方法本回顾性研究招募了2016年至2022年期间连续接受新生儿脑MRI检查的婴儿。从该队列中,在确认MRI检查结果正常和神经发育结果正常后选择极早产儿。ADC值在六个预定义的大脑区域测量。比较足月儿和早产儿之间的ADC值,并进一步对足月儿、极早产儿和极早产儿进行亚组分析。结果早产儿基底节区adc值明显高于足月儿。在其他五个大脑区域没有观察到显著的差异。足月、极早产儿和极早产儿的亚组分析显示,基底神经节ADC值存在显著差异,极早产儿和极早产儿的ADC值均高于足月婴儿。结论尽管常规MRI表现正常,神经发育预后良好,但TEA期早产儿基底神经节adc值明显高于足月儿。这些发现表明,与早产相关的大脑微观结构成熟存在区域特异性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书