Adherence to Antibiotic Treatments in Community Pharmacy: Analysis by Therapeutic Groups and Associated Factors.

IF 0.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios Pub Date : 2026-01-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-15 DOI:10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2026).07
J M Zarauz Céspedes, L Valdeolmillos Carbó
{"title":"Adherence to Antibiotic Treatments in Community Pharmacy: Analysis by Therapeutic Groups and Associated Factors.","authors":"J M Zarauz Céspedes, L Valdeolmillos Carbó","doi":"10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2026).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Non-adherence to antibiotic treatments contributes to the development of resistance. Community pharmacies provide an opportunity to assess and improve therapeutic adherence. This study analyzes which antibiotic groups present the highest non-adherence rates. <b>Objective:</b> To identify the therapeutic groups of antibiotics with the highest non-adherence in community pharmacy and to analyze associated factors such as age, sex, and reasons for treatment discontinuation. <b>Methods:</b> An observational, descriptive, and prospective study was conducted over 12 months in two pharmacies in a coastal town in Murcia, Spain. A total of 500 patients receiving antibiotic treatment were included. Sociodemographic variables and treatment characteristics were recorded. After 15 days, adherence was assessed using the Morisky-Green-Levine test, and reasons for non-adherence were documented. Chi-square statistical analysis and relative risks (RR) were calculated. <b>Results:</b> Of the 363 patients who completed the study, 37.2% did not adhere to their treatment. The highest non-adherence rates for oral treatments were observed in penicillin combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors (52.4%) and extended-spectrum penicillins (46.8%). The most frequent reason was forgetfulness, followed by schedule changes and perceived clinical improvement. No significant differences were found by sex (p = 0.136) or age group (p = 0.209). The RR was higher for penicillin combinations (RR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10-1.78) and lower for macrolides (RR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23-0.79). <b>Conclusions:</b> Penicillins, especially combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors, and topical antibiotics present a higher risk of non-adherence. Interventions from primary care and particularly from community pharmacy should be reinforced to improve adherence, especially in these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":40648,"journal":{"name":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","volume":"18 1","pages":"55-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12801711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2026).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Non-adherence to antibiotic treatments contributes to the development of resistance. Community pharmacies provide an opportunity to assess and improve therapeutic adherence. This study analyzes which antibiotic groups present the highest non-adherence rates. Objective: To identify the therapeutic groups of antibiotics with the highest non-adherence in community pharmacy and to analyze associated factors such as age, sex, and reasons for treatment discontinuation. Methods: An observational, descriptive, and prospective study was conducted over 12 months in two pharmacies in a coastal town in Murcia, Spain. A total of 500 patients receiving antibiotic treatment were included. Sociodemographic variables and treatment characteristics were recorded. After 15 days, adherence was assessed using the Morisky-Green-Levine test, and reasons for non-adherence were documented. Chi-square statistical analysis and relative risks (RR) were calculated. Results: Of the 363 patients who completed the study, 37.2% did not adhere to their treatment. The highest non-adherence rates for oral treatments were observed in penicillin combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors (52.4%) and extended-spectrum penicillins (46.8%). The most frequent reason was forgetfulness, followed by schedule changes and perceived clinical improvement. No significant differences were found by sex (p = 0.136) or age group (p = 0.209). The RR was higher for penicillin combinations (RR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10-1.78) and lower for macrolides (RR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23-0.79). Conclusions: Penicillins, especially combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors, and topical antibiotics present a higher risk of non-adherence. Interventions from primary care and particularly from community pharmacy should be reinforced to improve adherence, especially in these groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区药房抗生素治疗依从性:治疗组及相关因素分析。
引言:不坚持抗生素治疗有助于耐药性的发展。社区药房提供了一个评估和提高治疗依从性的机会。这项研究分析了哪些抗生素组的不依从率最高。目的:了解社区药房抗菌药物不依从率最高的治疗人群,分析年龄、性别、停药原因等相关因素。方法:在西班牙穆尔西亚沿海城镇的两家药店进行了为期12个月的观察性、描述性和前瞻性研究。共纳入500例接受抗生素治疗的患者。记录社会人口学变量和治疗特征。15天后,使用Morisky-Green-Levine测试评估依从性,并记录不依从性的原因。计算卡方统计分析和相对危险度(RR)。结果:在363名完成研究的患者中,37.2%的患者没有坚持治疗。在口服治疗中,青霉素联合β -内酰胺酶抑制剂(52.4%)和广谱青霉素(46.8%)的不依从率最高。最常见的原因是健忘,其次是计划改变和临床改善。性别(p = 0.136)和年龄组(p = 0.209)无显著差异。青霉素联合用药的RR较高(RR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10-1.78),大环内酯类药物的RR较低(RR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23-0.79)。结论:青霉素类药物,特别是与β -内酰胺酶抑制剂联合使用,以及局部抗生素存在较高的不依从风险。应加强初级保健,特别是社区药房的干预措施,以提高依从性,特别是在这些群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
351
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书