Biosimilar Therapeutics Substitution: American Academy of Neurology Position Statement.

IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200574
Jonathan D Santoro, Jonathan Crowe, Cale H Coppage, Emily Klatte, Benjamin Tolchin, Claire Riley, David A Evans, A Gordon Smith
{"title":"Biosimilar Therapeutics Substitution: American Academy of Neurology Position Statement.","authors":"Jonathan D Santoro, Jonathan Crowe, Cale H Coppage, Emily Klatte, Benjamin Tolchin, Claire Riley, David A Evans, A Gordon Smith","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic therapeutics have revolutionized treatment of disorders for which there were previously limited options. Biologic products are typically very expensive. However, the emergence of biosimilars (a biologic product that is nearly identical to a Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved \"branded\" version) offers an opportunity to reduce costs after the branded product's period of patent protection ends. Despite the promise of biosimilars, some physicians have expressed concern regarding interchangeability, especially in specific patient populations. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) supports the cost-saving potential of biosimilar therapeutics while emphasizing the importance of a balance between reducing costs, maintaining clinical efficacy, and preserving the integrity of the physician-patient relationship. This position statement from the AAN offers a framework to aid neurologists in deciding whether to switch a patient from a branded biologic product to a biosimilar therapeutic. This framework aligns with broader AAN policies on drug pricing and medical decision-making autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"16 2","pages":"e200574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologic therapeutics have revolutionized treatment of disorders for which there were previously limited options. Biologic products are typically very expensive. However, the emergence of biosimilars (a biologic product that is nearly identical to a Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved "branded" version) offers an opportunity to reduce costs after the branded product's period of patent protection ends. Despite the promise of biosimilars, some physicians have expressed concern regarding interchangeability, especially in specific patient populations. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) supports the cost-saving potential of biosimilar therapeutics while emphasizing the importance of a balance between reducing costs, maintaining clinical efficacy, and preserving the integrity of the physician-patient relationship. This position statement from the AAN offers a framework to aid neurologists in deciding whether to switch a patient from a branded biologic product to a biosimilar therapeutic. This framework aligns with broader AAN policies on drug pricing and medical decision-making autonomy.

生物仿制药替代疗法:美国神经病学学会立场声明。
生物疗法已经彻底改变了以前选择有限的疾病的治疗方法。生物制品通常非常昂贵。然而,生物仿制药(一种与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的“品牌”版本几乎相同的生物制品)的出现为品牌产品的专利保护期结束后降低成本提供了机会。尽管生物仿制药前景光明,但一些医生对可互换性表示担忧,特别是在特定的患者群体中。美国神经病学学会(AAN)支持生物仿制药治疗节省成本的潜力,同时强调在降低成本、保持临床疗效和保持医患关系完整性之间取得平衡的重要性。AAN的立场声明提供了一个框架,帮助神经科医生决定是否将患者从品牌生物制品转换为生物仿制药治疗。该框架与AAN关于药品定价和医疗决策自主权的更广泛政策保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书