Effect of smoking cessation on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Angiology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05487-2
Ryan Gouveia E Melo, Filipa Melo, Carlota Fernández Prendes, Tiago Magalhães, Ruy Fernandes E Fernandes, Luís Mendes Pedro, Daniel Caldeira
{"title":"Effect of smoking cessation on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Ryan Gouveia E Melo, Filipa Melo, Carlota Fernández Prendes, Tiago Magalhães, Ruy Fernandes E Fernandes, Luís Mendes Pedro, Daniel Caldeira","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05487-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To compare the effect of smoking cessation in abdominal aortic aneurysm growth compared to active smokers and non-smokers.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review and Network Meta-Analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42021295315). We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection and OpenGrey databases from inception to January 2022 for comparative studies reporting on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth according to smoking habits. AAA was defined as an infra-renal aortic diameter >3 cm. The main outcome was to estimate the mean difference of abdominal aortic aneurysms growth between smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers. The estimates were pooled through a random-effects model network meta-analysis and heterogeneity assessed through the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>After 567 abstracts reviewed and 17 full text studies, six studies were included in the review and meta-analysis. Studies reported data from 1987-2017, encompassing a population of 2960 people with diagnosis of AAA, which 972 were active smokers, 1254 were former smokers and 679 were nonsmokers. Based on the network estimates, we did not find a statistically significant difference between AAA growth rate differences between former smokers and non-smokers (MD 0.05, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.47). However, we found statistically significant differences between former smokers and active smokers (MD -0.45, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.06) and active smokers versus non-smokers (MD 0.50, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking cessation seems to reduce the growth rate of AAA to rates similar to non-smokers, being a potential therapeutic target. These findings should lead to a higher awareness of the importance of smoking eviction in AAA patients and to future studies on this matter.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"95-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05487-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To compare the effect of smoking cessation in abdominal aortic aneurysm growth compared to active smokers and non-smokers.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review and Network Meta-Analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42021295315). We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection and OpenGrey databases from inception to January 2022 for comparative studies reporting on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth according to smoking habits. AAA was defined as an infra-renal aortic diameter >3 cm. The main outcome was to estimate the mean difference of abdominal aortic aneurysms growth between smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers. The estimates were pooled through a random-effects model network meta-analysis and heterogeneity assessed through the I2 statistic.

Evidence synthesis: After 567 abstracts reviewed and 17 full text studies, six studies were included in the review and meta-analysis. Studies reported data from 1987-2017, encompassing a population of 2960 people with diagnosis of AAA, which 972 were active smokers, 1254 were former smokers and 679 were nonsmokers. Based on the network estimates, we did not find a statistically significant difference between AAA growth rate differences between former smokers and non-smokers (MD 0.05, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.47). However, we found statistically significant differences between former smokers and active smokers (MD -0.45, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.06) and active smokers versus non-smokers (MD 0.50, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.85).

Conclusions: Smoking cessation seems to reduce the growth rate of AAA to rates similar to non-smokers, being a potential therapeutic target. These findings should lead to a higher awareness of the importance of smoking eviction in AAA patients and to future studies on this matter.

戒烟对腹主动脉瘤生长的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
前言:比较戒烟对主动吸烟者和非吸烟者腹主动脉瘤生长的影响。证据获取:按照PRISMA指南使用注册方案(CRD42021295315)进行系统评价和网络meta分析。我们检索了MEDLINE、CENTRAL、PsycInfo、Web of Science Core Collection和OpenGrey数据库,从成立到2022年1月,以比较研究报告吸烟习惯对腹主动脉瘤生长的影响。AAA定义为肾下主动脉直径bbb3cm。主要结果是估计吸烟者、前吸烟者和非吸烟者腹主动脉瘤生长的平均差异。通过随机效应模型网络荟萃分析汇总估计,并通过I2统计量评估异质性。证据综合:在567篇综述和17篇全文研究后,6项研究被纳入综述和荟萃分析。研究报告了1987-2017年的数据,包括2960名被诊断为AAA的人群,其中972名是活跃吸烟者,1254名是前吸烟者,679名是非吸烟者。基于网络估计,我们没有发现前吸烟者和非吸烟者之间的AAA增长率差异有统计学意义(MD 0.05, 95% CI: -0.36 ~ 0.47)。然而,我们发现前吸烟者和活跃吸烟者(MD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.83至-0.06)和活跃吸烟者与非吸烟者(MD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.16至0.85)之间存在统计学上的显著差异。结论:戒烟似乎可以将AAA的增长率降低到与不吸烟者相似的水平,是一个潜在的治疗靶点。这些发现应该会使人们对AAA级患者戒烟的重要性有更高的认识,并对这一问题进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书