“Long illness, no filial children?” Offsprings' care for older adults with disabilities in China

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Xuehao Huang
{"title":"“Long illness, no filial children?” Offsprings' care for older adults with disabilities in China","authors":"Xuehao Huang","doi":"10.1111/fare.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines whether the proverb “long illness, no filial children” still holds in contemporary China by assessing the effects of caregiving duration and intensity on offsprings' caregiving performance for disabled older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>China's aging population and rising disability rates impose heavy caregiving burdens on families. Although filial piety strongly influences children's caregiving responsibilities, whether prolonged care truly erodes caregiving performance remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Drawing on 2011–2018 panel data from the China Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (<i>N</i> = 2,047), this study focuses on older adults needing assistance with at least one activity of daily living and receiving care primarily from an adult child. Random-effects models examine how caregiving duration and intensity relate to offsprings' caregiving performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>High-intensity caregiving significantly diminishes offsprings' reported caregiving performance, whereas caregiving duration alone shows no significant effect. Subgroup analyses (gender, urban/rural residence, financial situation) confirm that heavier caregiving intensity predict lower caregiving performance across diverse contexts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Policies that alleviate high-intensity caregiving—such as financial assistance, respite services, and community-based support—may improve care for disabled older adults and better sustain filial caregiving commitments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings indicate that intensity rather than duration largely explains declines in caregiving performance, offering partial support for the proverb under modern conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"75 1","pages":"213-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.70112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examines whether the proverb “long illness, no filial children” still holds in contemporary China by assessing the effects of caregiving duration and intensity on offsprings' caregiving performance for disabled older adults.

Background

China's aging population and rising disability rates impose heavy caregiving burdens on families. Although filial piety strongly influences children's caregiving responsibilities, whether prolonged care truly erodes caregiving performance remains unclear.

Method

Drawing on 2011–2018 panel data from the China Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (N = 2,047), this study focuses on older adults needing assistance with at least one activity of daily living and receiving care primarily from an adult child. Random-effects models examine how caregiving duration and intensity relate to offsprings' caregiving performance.

Results

High-intensity caregiving significantly diminishes offsprings' reported caregiving performance, whereas caregiving duration alone shows no significant effect. Subgroup analyses (gender, urban/rural residence, financial situation) confirm that heavier caregiving intensity predict lower caregiving performance across diverse contexts.

Implications

Policies that alleviate high-intensity caregiving—such as financial assistance, respite services, and community-based support—may improve care for disabled older adults and better sustain filial caregiving commitments.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that intensity rather than duration largely explains declines in caregiving performance, offering partial support for the proverb under modern conditions.

“长病,不孝子?”中国残疾老年人的子女照顾
目的通过评估照顾时间和强度对子女照顾残疾老年人表现的影响,探讨“病久不孝”这句谚语在当代中国是否仍然成立。中国的人口老龄化和不断上升的残疾率给家庭带来了沉重的照顾负担。虽然孝道对孩子的照顾责任有很大的影响,但长期的照顾是否真的会影响孩子的照顾表现还不清楚。方法利用2011-2018年中国纵向健康寿命调查(N = 2047)的面板数据,本研究重点关注需要至少一项日常生活活动帮助并主要由成年子女照顾的老年人。随机效应模型检验了照顾的持续时间和强度与后代的照顾表现之间的关系。结果高强度的照顾显著降低了子女的照顾表现,而单独的照顾时间对子女的照顾表现没有显著影响。亚组分析(性别、城市/农村居住、经济状况)证实,在不同背景下,照料强度越大,照料绩效越低。减轻高强度照顾的政策,如经济援助、临时服务和社区支持,可能会改善对残疾老年人的照顾,并更好地维持孝道照顾的承诺。结论这些研究结果表明,在很大程度上,强度而不是持续时间解释了照顾行为的下降,在现代条件下为这句谚语提供了部分支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书