Partisan Emotions and Government Trust: Taiwan's COVID-19 Experience

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Chun-Chieh Wang, Yu-Kang Lee, Hsin-Hao Lin
{"title":"Partisan Emotions and Government Trust: Taiwan's COVID-19 Experience","authors":"Chun-Chieh Wang,&nbsp;Yu-Kang Lee,&nbsp;Hsin-Hao Lin","doi":"10.1111/aspp.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates how political partisanship and emotional responses influenced Taiwanese public trust in government during COVID-19. Drawing on crisis management and partisan motivated reasoning theories, we conducted a two-phase survey (<i>N</i> = 2136) examining attitudes toward six significant pandemic events. Political affiliation was the predominant predictor of attitudes toward governmental pandemic responses, with substantial differences between pan-Green and pan-Blue supporters. Education and relative deprivation also emerged as consistent predictors, with higher education corresponding to more critical evaluations. Most notably, negative emotions—particularly anger—significantly moderated the relationship between political affiliation and government trust. Anger demonstrated stronger moderating effects than fear across all models. These findings contradict the “rally-around-the-flag” effect, suggesting Taiwan's pre-existing political cleavages remained salient and were amplified by emotional responses during the pandemic, advancing understanding of differential emotional influences on political attitudes during crises within competitive democratic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":44747,"journal":{"name":"Asian Politics & Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aspp.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aspp.70058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how political partisanship and emotional responses influenced Taiwanese public trust in government during COVID-19. Drawing on crisis management and partisan motivated reasoning theories, we conducted a two-phase survey (N = 2136) examining attitudes toward six significant pandemic events. Political affiliation was the predominant predictor of attitudes toward governmental pandemic responses, with substantial differences between pan-Green and pan-Blue supporters. Education and relative deprivation also emerged as consistent predictors, with higher education corresponding to more critical evaluations. Most notably, negative emotions—particularly anger—significantly moderated the relationship between political affiliation and government trust. Anger demonstrated stronger moderating effects than fear across all models. These findings contradict the “rally-around-the-flag” effect, suggesting Taiwan's pre-existing political cleavages remained salient and were amplified by emotional responses during the pandemic, advancing understanding of differential emotional influences on political attitudes during crises within competitive democratic contexts.

Abstract Image

党派情绪与政府信任:台湾新冠疫情经验
本研究旨在探讨在新冠疫情期间,政治党派关系与情绪反应如何影响台湾民众对政府的信任。利用危机管理和党派动机推理理论,我们进行了一项两阶段调查(N = 2136),调查了人们对六个重大流行病事件的态度。政治派别是对政府流行病应对态度的主要预测因素,泛绿和泛蓝支持者之间存在实质性差异。教育和相对贫困也成为一致的预测因素,高等教育与更重要的评价相对应。最值得注意的是,负面情绪——尤其是愤怒——显著地调节了政治派别和政府信任之间的关系。在所有模型中,愤怒表现出比恐惧更强的调节作用。这些发现与“团结在旗帜周围”效应相矛盾,表明台湾先前存在的政治分歧仍然突出,并在疫情期间被情绪反应放大,从而促进了对竞争民主背景下危机期间情绪对政治态度的不同影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书