Quality of Life Evaluation Using Questionnaires in Breast Cancer Patients after Surgery: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3243
Mihaela Năstase, Ciprian-Andrei Coroleucă, Aniela Nodiţi, Teodora-Mihaela Peleaşă, Maria-Teodora Popa, Cristian Ioan Bordea, Alexandru Blidaru
{"title":"Quality of Life Evaluation Using Questionnaires in Breast Cancer Patients after Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mihaela Năstase, Ciprian-Andrei Coroleucă, Aniela Nodiţi, Teodora-Mihaela Peleaşă, Maria-Teodora Popa, Cristian Ioan Bordea, Alexandru Blidaru","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> breast cancer continues to dominate as the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women globally, with surgery playing a key role in treatment. Despite advances in disease management and improved survival, the impact on patients quality of life (QoL) remains an important issue. This review aims to synthesize evidence on QoL outcomes, focusing on patient-reported outcomes following different types of breast cancer surgery. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2022 until May 2025 to identify English-language publications on breast cancer QoL using validated PROMS. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed independently by two authors. <b>Results:</b> The EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 instruments demonstrated superior body image and emotional functioning following breast-conserving surgery. However, 40 to 60% of patients undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported persistent sexual dysfunction. SF-36 and FACT-B indicated improvements in physical and mental health postreconstruction, although 31% of mastectomy patients remained below functional thresholds. BREAST-Q revealed higher satisfaction and better psychosocial well-being in autologous reconstruction compared to implant-based reconstruction. Oncoplastic breast surgery was associated with significantly higher mean BREAST-Q breast-conserving treatment (BCT) scores compared to conventional wide local excision, with patients in the oncoplastic group reporting approximately 90% mean satisfaction with breast appearance versus 75% in the conventional group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Breast-conserving surgery or reconstruction after mastectomy improves quality of life compared to mastectomy alone. Oncoplastic breast surgery significantly enhances body image relative to conventional wide local excision (BCT). Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with greater patient satisfaction but carries a higher risk of complications compared to implant-based reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 6","pages":"611-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: breast cancer continues to dominate as the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women globally, with surgery playing a key role in treatment. Despite advances in disease management and improved survival, the impact on patients quality of life (QoL) remains an important issue. This review aims to synthesize evidence on QoL outcomes, focusing on patient-reported outcomes following different types of breast cancer surgery. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2022 until May 2025 to identify English-language publications on breast cancer QoL using validated PROMS. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed independently by two authors. Results: The EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 instruments demonstrated superior body image and emotional functioning following breast-conserving surgery. However, 40 to 60% of patients undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction reported persistent sexual dysfunction. SF-36 and FACT-B indicated improvements in physical and mental health postreconstruction, although 31% of mastectomy patients remained below functional thresholds. BREAST-Q revealed higher satisfaction and better psychosocial well-being in autologous reconstruction compared to implant-based reconstruction. Oncoplastic breast surgery was associated with significantly higher mean BREAST-Q breast-conserving treatment (BCT) scores compared to conventional wide local excision, with patients in the oncoplastic group reporting approximately 90% mean satisfaction with breast appearance versus 75% in the conventional group. Conclusions: Breast-conserving surgery or reconstruction after mastectomy improves quality of life compared to mastectomy alone. Oncoplastic breast surgery significantly enhances body image relative to conventional wide local excision (BCT). Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with greater patient satisfaction but carries a higher risk of complications compared to implant-based reconstruction.

用问卷评估乳腺癌术后患者的生活质量:一项系统综述。
导读:乳腺癌仍然是全球女性中最常见的恶性肿瘤,手术在治疗中起着关键作用。尽管疾病管理和生存率有所提高,但对患者生活质量(QoL)的影响仍然是一个重要问题。本综述旨在综合有关生活质量结局的证据,重点关注不同类型乳腺癌手术后患者报告的结局。方法:从2022年1月至2025年5月,系统检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,使用经过验证的PROMS识别关于乳腺癌生活质量的英语出版物。17项研究符合纳入标准,并由两位作者独立审查。结果:EORTC QLQ-C30和BR23仪器在保乳手术后表现出较好的身体形象和情绪功能。然而,40 - 60%接受乳房切除术而不重建的患者报告了持续的性功能障碍。SF-36和FACT-B表明,尽管31%的乳房切除术患者仍低于功能阈值,但术后的身心健康状况有所改善。BREAST-Q显示自体重建术与植入式重建术相比有更高的满意度和更好的社会心理健康。与传统的广泛局部切除相比,乳腺肿瘤整形手术的平均breast- q保乳治疗(BCT)评分明显更高,肿瘤整形组患者对乳房外观的平均满意度约为90%,而传统组为75%。结论:与单纯乳房切除术相比,乳房切除术后保乳手术或乳房重建可提高生活质量。与传统的大面积局部切除(BCT)相比,乳腺肿瘤整形手术显著提高了身体形象。自体乳房重建与更高的患者满意度相关,但与基于植入物的重建相比,并发症的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书