Juan Ignacio Guzmán , Patricio Faúndez , Mariel Carrión
{"title":"Bibliometric and systematic analysis of literature on royalties in non-renewable resources","authors":"Juan Ignacio Guzmán , Patricio Faúndez , Mariel Carrión","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.105829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a mixed-methods review of academic research on royalties in non-renewable resources. Drawing on 156 peer-reviewed articles published between 1978 and 2025, we combine bibliometric indicators (Bibliometrix), text mining (VOSviewer co-occurrence with binary counting), and directed qualitative content analysis to map the evolution, structure, and substantive focus of the field. The literature grows gradually over time (CAGR 1.52 % up to 2024) with a peak in 2023, and remains concentrated in a handful of journals. International collaboration is modest: 15.75 % of publications are multi-country. To gauge the sensitivity of scholarship to market conditions, we correlate annual publication counts with real commodity prices: the annual correlation with WTI oil is 0.38 (0.53 with a two-year lag), and with LME copper is 0.54 (0.67 with a three-year lag), indicating that publication surges tend to follow commodity booms with short lags, consistent with rent-seeking pressures and policy debates triggered by rising rents.</div><div>Term co-occurrence reveals three recurrent vocabularies that structure the field: (1) Royalties in fiscal regimes (comparisons of <em>ad valorem</em>, specific, and profit-based designs; revenue properties and cyclicality), (2) Royalty design and institutions (legal/contractual architectures, administrative mechanics, and project-level effects such as cut-off grades and resource sterilization), and (3) Economic and developmental outcomes (intergovernmental distribution, local development, governance). Bridging terms such as revenue and rate indicate partial overlap, yet the fiscal-design and developmental strands have advanced largely in parallel.</div><div>By integrating science-mapping with qualitative synthesis, the study systematizes a fragmented literature and highlights priorities for future work: stronger cross-country designs, closer linkage of fiscal design to developmental evaluation, and attention to royalty reform under the energy-transition and critical-minerals agenda.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 105829"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420726000012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents a mixed-methods review of academic research on royalties in non-renewable resources. Drawing on 156 peer-reviewed articles published between 1978 and 2025, we combine bibliometric indicators (Bibliometrix), text mining (VOSviewer co-occurrence with binary counting), and directed qualitative content analysis to map the evolution, structure, and substantive focus of the field. The literature grows gradually over time (CAGR 1.52 % up to 2024) with a peak in 2023, and remains concentrated in a handful of journals. International collaboration is modest: 15.75 % of publications are multi-country. To gauge the sensitivity of scholarship to market conditions, we correlate annual publication counts with real commodity prices: the annual correlation with WTI oil is 0.38 (0.53 with a two-year lag), and with LME copper is 0.54 (0.67 with a three-year lag), indicating that publication surges tend to follow commodity booms with short lags, consistent with rent-seeking pressures and policy debates triggered by rising rents.
Term co-occurrence reveals three recurrent vocabularies that structure the field: (1) Royalties in fiscal regimes (comparisons of ad valorem, specific, and profit-based designs; revenue properties and cyclicality), (2) Royalty design and institutions (legal/contractual architectures, administrative mechanics, and project-level effects such as cut-off grades and resource sterilization), and (3) Economic and developmental outcomes (intergovernmental distribution, local development, governance). Bridging terms such as revenue and rate indicate partial overlap, yet the fiscal-design and developmental strands have advanced largely in parallel.
By integrating science-mapping with qualitative synthesis, the study systematizes a fragmented literature and highlights priorities for future work: stronger cross-country designs, closer linkage of fiscal design to developmental evaluation, and attention to royalty reform under the energy-transition and critical-minerals agenda.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.