Understanding luxury shaming: a multi-study exploration using qualitative inquiry and generative AI

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.115996
Julia Pueschel , Shuyi Hao , Bernd Schmitt
{"title":"Understanding luxury shaming: a multi-study exploration using qualitative inquiry and generative AI","authors":"Julia Pueschel ,&nbsp;Shuyi Hao ,&nbsp;Bernd Schmitt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.115996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates luxury shaming—the social act of assigning negative judgment or disapproval to individuals who engage in luxury consumption. We explore how consumers shame others, and how shamed consumers experience, feel, and cope with such judgments. Methodologically, we integrate traditional qualitative techniques and innovative Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) analysis. Results reveal that luxury shaming is enacted through distinct shaming categories found in the marketplace—intellectual, economic, socio-cultural, physical/aesthetic, and ethical/moral—and triggers emotional responses ranging from embarrassment to guilt and anxiety. Furthermore, we identify three bipolar coping dimensions—stylistic, social-interactive, and value-related—each encompassing two distinct strategies that consumers use to maintain engagement with luxury consumption. Key contributions include expanding the luxury consumption literature by examining its negative consequences, advancing the understanding of shaming-related emotions in consumer behavior, and, methodologically, demonstrating GenAI’s role in complementing qualitative analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 115996"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296326000305","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates luxury shaming—the social act of assigning negative judgment or disapproval to individuals who engage in luxury consumption. We explore how consumers shame others, and how shamed consumers experience, feel, and cope with such judgments. Methodologically, we integrate traditional qualitative techniques and innovative Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) analysis. Results reveal that luxury shaming is enacted through distinct shaming categories found in the marketplace—intellectual, economic, socio-cultural, physical/aesthetic, and ethical/moral—and triggers emotional responses ranging from embarrassment to guilt and anxiety. Furthermore, we identify three bipolar coping dimensions—stylistic, social-interactive, and value-related—each encompassing two distinct strategies that consumers use to maintain engagement with luxury consumption. Key contributions include expanding the luxury consumption literature by examining its negative consequences, advancing the understanding of shaming-related emotions in consumer behavior, and, methodologically, demonstrating GenAI’s role in complementing qualitative analysis.
理解奢侈品羞辱:使用定性调查和生成人工智能的多研究探索
这项研究调查了奢侈品羞耻感——一种对从事奢侈品消费的个人进行负面评价或反对的社会行为。我们探讨了消费者如何羞辱他人,以及被羞辱的消费者如何体验、感受和应对这样的判断。在方法上,我们整合了传统的定性技术和创新的生成人工智能(GenAI)分析。结果显示,奢侈品羞耻感是通过市场上不同的羞耻感类别——智力、经济、社会文化、身体/审美和伦理/道德——产生的,并引发从尴尬到内疚和焦虑的情绪反应。此外,我们确定了三个两极应对维度——风格、社会互动和价值相关——每个维度都包含消费者用来保持奢侈品消费参与的两种不同策略。主要贡献包括通过研究其负面影响来扩展奢侈品消费文献,推进对消费者行为中羞耻相关情绪的理解,以及在方法上证明GenAI在补充定性分析方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书