Categorization of unmanned ship collision liability under dual-track analysis framework

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Marine Policy Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107034
Miao Wenqing
{"title":"Categorization of unmanned ship collision liability under dual-track analysis framework","authors":"Miao Wenqing","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper focuses on the coordination of unmanned ship technology and legal doctrine. Based on the traditional theory of tort and liability, this paper tries to analyze how to regulate unmanned ship collision liability by combining the impact and challenges of unmanned ships on the tort theory of ship collision. The analysis delves into the two major attributes of unmanned ships: ship attribute and artificial intelligence attribute. On this basis, there is the viewpoint of this paper: we should impartially consider both the ship attribute and the artificial intelligence attribute when constructing the collision liability system for unmanned ships. As results, it is recommended that the traditional liability for ship collision shall still be applicable to unmanned ship collision liability due to the nature of ships, but additional types of liabilities are demanded due to the artificial intelligence attribute so as to avoid the biased application of rules. Moreover, these types of liabilities are not directly applicable, which means the rules need to be reformed appropriately. This paper finally gives the conclusion that the tort liability for unmanned ship collision shall be categorized as “product liability + tort liability for traditional ship collision” by integrating the influence of the two attributes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 107034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X26000047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on the coordination of unmanned ship technology and legal doctrine. Based on the traditional theory of tort and liability, this paper tries to analyze how to regulate unmanned ship collision liability by combining the impact and challenges of unmanned ships on the tort theory of ship collision. The analysis delves into the two major attributes of unmanned ships: ship attribute and artificial intelligence attribute. On this basis, there is the viewpoint of this paper: we should impartially consider both the ship attribute and the artificial intelligence attribute when constructing the collision liability system for unmanned ships. As results, it is recommended that the traditional liability for ship collision shall still be applicable to unmanned ship collision liability due to the nature of ships, but additional types of liabilities are demanded due to the artificial intelligence attribute so as to avoid the biased application of rules. Moreover, these types of liabilities are not directly applicable, which means the rules need to be reformed appropriately. This paper finally gives the conclusion that the tort liability for unmanned ship collision shall be categorized as “product liability + tort liability for traditional ship collision” by integrating the influence of the two attributes.
双轨分析框架下无人船碰撞责任分类
本文主要研究无人船技术与法律理论的协调问题。本文试图在传统侵权责任理论的基础上,结合无人船对船舶碰撞侵权理论的冲击和挑战,分析如何规制无人船碰撞责任。分析了无人船的两大属性:船舶属性和人工智能属性。在此基础上,提出了在构建无人船舶碰撞责任制度时,应公正地兼顾船舶属性和人工智能属性的观点。因此,由于船舶的性质,建议将传统的船舶碰撞责任适用于无人船碰撞责任,但由于人工智能属性,需要增加责任类型,以避免规则适用的偏差。此外,这些类型的负债并不直接适用,这意味着需要对规则进行适当的改革。综合两者属性的影响,得出无人船碰撞侵权责任应归为“产品责任+ 传统船舶碰撞侵权责任”的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书