Functional differences between aquatic herbivores emerge from bioenergetic processes

IF 3.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecological Modelling Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111465
Tjui Yeuw Tan , Andrew G. Hirst , Joop W.P. Coolen , Jan Jaap Poos , Jaap van der Meer
{"title":"Functional differences between aquatic herbivores emerge from bioenergetic processes","authors":"Tjui Yeuw Tan ,&nbsp;Andrew G. Hirst ,&nbsp;Joop W.P. Coolen ,&nbsp;Jan Jaap Poos ,&nbsp;Jaap van der Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Primary consumers, also known as grazers, transfer energy fixated by primary production to higher trophic levels. In aquatic environments, two grazer groups are dominant — those living in the open water (pelagic) and those living associated to a surface (benthic). When traits are used to compare both groups, selecting the appropriate traits to compare is a crucial step. Bioenergetic approaches can help standardize trait selection and identify which are most relevant. We showed the bioenergetic traits that differentiate these grazer groups using Dynamic Energy Budget theory. We also explored the life-history implications of expressing such traits. Pelagic grazers reach sexual maturity faster and use more energy for somatic maintenance per unit of structural volume. The energy used in somatic maintenance is also associated to nitrogen excretion, which helps cycle nutrients in the water column. In contrast, benthic grazers generally consume less oxygen per unit of dry weight and are more efficient in producing biomass from assimilated energy. The bioenergetic traits driving differences between grazer groups uncover the emergence of contrasting body sizes, development rates, and life-span. Predictions based on these traits also reveal different ecosystem roles in terms of nutrient cycling and biomass fixation. This bioenergetic approach clarifies how different traits contribute to the relative roles of organisms in an ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"514 ","pages":"Article 111465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002500451X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Primary consumers, also known as grazers, transfer energy fixated by primary production to higher trophic levels. In aquatic environments, two grazer groups are dominant — those living in the open water (pelagic) and those living associated to a surface (benthic). When traits are used to compare both groups, selecting the appropriate traits to compare is a crucial step. Bioenergetic approaches can help standardize trait selection and identify which are most relevant. We showed the bioenergetic traits that differentiate these grazer groups using Dynamic Energy Budget theory. We also explored the life-history implications of expressing such traits. Pelagic grazers reach sexual maturity faster and use more energy for somatic maintenance per unit of structural volume. The energy used in somatic maintenance is also associated to nitrogen excretion, which helps cycle nutrients in the water column. In contrast, benthic grazers generally consume less oxygen per unit of dry weight and are more efficient in producing biomass from assimilated energy. The bioenergetic traits driving differences between grazer groups uncover the emergence of contrasting body sizes, development rates, and life-span. Predictions based on these traits also reveal different ecosystem roles in terms of nutrient cycling and biomass fixation. This bioenergetic approach clarifies how different traits contribute to the relative roles of organisms in an ecosystem.

Abstract Image

水生食草动物之间的功能差异源于生物能量过程
初级消费者,也被称为食草动物,将初级生产所固定的能量转移到更高的营养水平。在水生环境中,两类食草动物占主导地位——生活在开阔水域(远洋)的食草动物和生活在水面(底栖)的食草动物。当性状被用来比较两组时,选择合适的性状进行比较是至关重要的一步。生物能量方法可以帮助标准化性状选择,并确定哪些是最相关的。利用动态能量收支理论分析了不同食草动物群体的生物能量特征。我们还探讨了表达这些特征的生活史含义。远洋食草动物性成熟速度更快,单位结构体积消耗更多能量用于体细胞维持。体细胞维持所使用的能量也与氮排泄有关,氮排泄有助于水柱中营养物质的循环。相比之下,底栖食草动物通常每单位干重消耗较少的氧气,并且更有效地从同化的能量中产生生物量。驱动食草动物群体之间差异的生物能量特征揭示了不同体型、发育速度和寿命的出现。基于这些特征的预测也揭示了不同生态系统在养分循环和生物量固定方面的作用。这种生物能量的方法阐明了不同的特征如何有助于生物在生态系统中的相对角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书