Tjui Yeuw Tan , Andrew G. Hirst , Joop W.P. Coolen , Jan Jaap Poos , Jaap van der Meer
{"title":"Functional differences between aquatic herbivores emerge from bioenergetic processes","authors":"Tjui Yeuw Tan , Andrew G. Hirst , Joop W.P. Coolen , Jan Jaap Poos , Jaap van der Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Primary consumers, also known as grazers, transfer energy fixated by primary production to higher trophic levels. In aquatic environments, two grazer groups are dominant — those living in the open water (pelagic) and those living associated to a surface (benthic). When traits are used to compare both groups, selecting the appropriate traits to compare is a crucial step. Bioenergetic approaches can help standardize trait selection and identify which are most relevant. We showed the bioenergetic traits that differentiate these grazer groups using Dynamic Energy Budget theory. We also explored the life-history implications of expressing such traits. Pelagic grazers reach sexual maturity faster and use more energy for somatic maintenance per unit of structural volume. The energy used in somatic maintenance is also associated to nitrogen excretion, which helps cycle nutrients in the water column. In contrast, benthic grazers generally consume less oxygen per unit of dry weight and are more efficient in producing biomass from assimilated energy. The bioenergetic traits driving differences between grazer groups uncover the emergence of contrasting body sizes, development rates, and life-span. Predictions based on these traits also reveal different ecosystem roles in terms of nutrient cycling and biomass fixation. This bioenergetic approach clarifies how different traits contribute to the relative roles of organisms in an ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"514 ","pages":"Article 111465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002500451X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Primary consumers, also known as grazers, transfer energy fixated by primary production to higher trophic levels. In aquatic environments, two grazer groups are dominant — those living in the open water (pelagic) and those living associated to a surface (benthic). When traits are used to compare both groups, selecting the appropriate traits to compare is a crucial step. Bioenergetic approaches can help standardize trait selection and identify which are most relevant. We showed the bioenergetic traits that differentiate these grazer groups using Dynamic Energy Budget theory. We also explored the life-history implications of expressing such traits. Pelagic grazers reach sexual maturity faster and use more energy for somatic maintenance per unit of structural volume. The energy used in somatic maintenance is also associated to nitrogen excretion, which helps cycle nutrients in the water column. In contrast, benthic grazers generally consume less oxygen per unit of dry weight and are more efficient in producing biomass from assimilated energy. The bioenergetic traits driving differences between grazer groups uncover the emergence of contrasting body sizes, development rates, and life-span. Predictions based on these traits also reveal different ecosystem roles in terms of nutrient cycling and biomass fixation. This bioenergetic approach clarifies how different traits contribute to the relative roles of organisms in an ecosystem.
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).