Application of qualitative and quantitative techniques to estimate the sex of Brazilian skulls and mandibles

Q3 Medicine
Forensic Science International: Reports Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.fsir.2026.100450
Ezequiel Ortiz Rosa , Sergio Ricardo Marques , Edgard Michel-Crosato , Thais Torralbo Lopes-Capp , Maria Gabriela Haye Biazevic
{"title":"Application of qualitative and quantitative techniques to estimate the sex of Brazilian skulls and mandibles","authors":"Ezequiel Ortiz Rosa ,&nbsp;Sergio Ricardo Marques ,&nbsp;Edgard Michel-Crosato ,&nbsp;Thais Torralbo Lopes-Capp ,&nbsp;Maria Gabriela Haye Biazevic","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2026.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating sex in human skulls is an essential step in forensic identification. The combined application of qualitative and quantitative techniques allows for greater accuracy, especially in specific populations such as the Brazilian one, characterized by great biological diversity. Considering the ethnic and geographic diversity of Brazil, this study aims to conduct a comparative assessment of accuracy for sex estimation applicable to the Brazilian population. The research was conducted with 96 skulls and 96 mandibles from the collection of the Federal University of São Paulo, using two distinct methods: the qualitative (anthroposcopy) method and the quantitative (anthropometric) method. Although qualitative and quantitative analyses are constantly discussed, there is a lack of comparison between analyses in the Brazilian population. The qualitative analysis had a 73.00 % accuracy rate with a 0.524 kappa coefficient, while the quantitative method had an 82.00 % overall accuracy, with greater sensitivity for females (95.00 %). The variables Maxium Cranial Length (GOL), Basion-Bregma Height (BBH), and Bizygomatic Width (ZYB) (skull), as well as Bigonial Width (BGB) and Right Mandibular Ramus Height (MRHd) (mandible), showed greater discriminatory capacity according to the area under the ROC curve. The research highlights that, although the qualitative method is traditionally accepted and of practical application, it is more subject to interobserver errors, while the quantitative method offers greater standardization and precision, being useful mainly in forensic contexts that require objective and statistically based data. It is concluded that. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate the need for additional research to validate new methods and improve outcomes for the Brazilian population. Hence, they should be applied to local population samples for greater reliability in forensic results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910726000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating sex in human skulls is an essential step in forensic identification. The combined application of qualitative and quantitative techniques allows for greater accuracy, especially in specific populations such as the Brazilian one, characterized by great biological diversity. Considering the ethnic and geographic diversity of Brazil, this study aims to conduct a comparative assessment of accuracy for sex estimation applicable to the Brazilian population. The research was conducted with 96 skulls and 96 mandibles from the collection of the Federal University of São Paulo, using two distinct methods: the qualitative (anthroposcopy) method and the quantitative (anthropometric) method. Although qualitative and quantitative analyses are constantly discussed, there is a lack of comparison between analyses in the Brazilian population. The qualitative analysis had a 73.00 % accuracy rate with a 0.524 kappa coefficient, while the quantitative method had an 82.00 % overall accuracy, with greater sensitivity for females (95.00 %). The variables Maxium Cranial Length (GOL), Basion-Bregma Height (BBH), and Bizygomatic Width (ZYB) (skull), as well as Bigonial Width (BGB) and Right Mandibular Ramus Height (MRHd) (mandible), showed greater discriminatory capacity according to the area under the ROC curve. The research highlights that, although the qualitative method is traditionally accepted and of practical application, it is more subject to interobserver errors, while the quantitative method offers greater standardization and precision, being useful mainly in forensic contexts that require objective and statistically based data. It is concluded that. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate the need for additional research to validate new methods and improve outcomes for the Brazilian population. Hence, they should be applied to local population samples for greater reliability in forensic results.
应用定性和定量技术估计巴西头骨和下颌骨的性别
估计人类头骨的性别是法医鉴定的重要步骤。定性和定量技术的结合应用可以提高准确性,特别是在诸如巴西的特定种群中,其特点是生物多样性很大。考虑到巴西的种族和地理多样性,本研究旨在对适用于巴西人口的性别估计的准确性进行比较评估。这项研究使用了来自圣保罗联邦大学的96个头骨和96个下颌骨,采用了两种不同的方法:定性(人体镜)方法和定量(人体测量学)方法。虽然不断讨论定性和定量分析,但在巴西人口中缺乏分析之间的比较。定性分析的准确率为73.00 %,kappa系数为0.524,而定量分析的总体准确率为82.00 %,对女性的敏感性更高(95.00 %)。根据ROC曲线下的面积,最大颅长(GOL)、基底-布雷格马高度(BBH)和双颧宽度(ZYB)(颅骨)以及双叉宽度(BGB)和右下颌支高度(MRHd)(下颌骨)显示出更大的区分能力。研究强调,尽管定性方法在传统上被接受和实际应用,但它更容易受到观察者之间错误的影响,而定量方法提供了更高的标准化和精度,主要在需要客观和基于统计的数据的法医环境中有用。结论是。定量和定性研究结果表明,需要进一步研究以验证新方法并改善巴西人口的结果。因此,它们应应用于当地人口样本,以提高法医结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书