Technological pathways and sustainability insights into spent lithium-ion batteries

IF 9.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Sustainable Materials and Technologies Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.susmat.2026.e01859
Anusha Ekanayake , Samson S. Yu , Sakib T. Hossain , Hongli Su , Yihan Chen , Joe Fleming , Yongqing Zhang , Shuaifei Zhao
{"title":"Technological pathways and sustainability insights into spent lithium-ion batteries","authors":"Anusha Ekanayake ,&nbsp;Samson S. Yu ,&nbsp;Sakib T. Hossain ,&nbsp;Hongli Su ,&nbsp;Yihan Chen ,&nbsp;Joe Fleming ,&nbsp;Yongqing Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuaifei Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.susmat.2026.e01859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) provides a strategic pathway toward resource circularity, carbon emission reduction, and supply chain resilience amid the growing accumulation of end-of-life LIBs. This review synthesizes state-of-the-art developments in LIB recycling technologies and provides a critical comparison of their technical mechanisms, process efficiencies, and scalability at both laboratory and industrial levels. Existing life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis studies are critically compared for evaluating the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of different recycling technologies. This work supports informed decision-making by researchers, policymakers, and industry by identifying key challenges and providing future directions to ensure the long-term sustainability of the battery industry. Although conventional metallurgical approaches demonstrate strong industrial applicability, they are limited by high operating temperatures and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, direct recycling and upcycling methods offer simpler and more efficient routes to retain the residual value of spent LIBs. However, the need for advanced pretreatment steps and reliance on accurate assessment of failure states limit practical implementation. Apart from technological advancements, supportive policy frameworks and regulatory standards are essential for the sustainable life-cycle management of LIBs. This review aims to inspire innovative solutions that combine technological advancement with sustainable industrial practices to enhance circular management of LIBs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22097,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article e01859"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993726000102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) provides a strategic pathway toward resource circularity, carbon emission reduction, and supply chain resilience amid the growing accumulation of end-of-life LIBs. This review synthesizes state-of-the-art developments in LIB recycling technologies and provides a critical comparison of their technical mechanisms, process efficiencies, and scalability at both laboratory and industrial levels. Existing life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis studies are critically compared for evaluating the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of different recycling technologies. This work supports informed decision-making by researchers, policymakers, and industry by identifying key challenges and providing future directions to ensure the long-term sustainability of the battery industry. Although conventional metallurgical approaches demonstrate strong industrial applicability, they are limited by high operating temperatures and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, direct recycling and upcycling methods offer simpler and more efficient routes to retain the residual value of spent LIBs. However, the need for advanced pretreatment steps and reliance on accurate assessment of failure states limit practical implementation. Apart from technological advancements, supportive policy frameworks and regulatory standards are essential for the sustainable life-cycle management of LIBs. This review aims to inspire innovative solutions that combine technological advancement with sustainable industrial practices to enhance circular management of LIBs.

Abstract Image

废锂离子电池的技术路径和可持续性见解
回收废旧锂离子电池(LIBs)为资源循环、碳减排和供应链弹性提供了一条战略途径,以应对日益增多的报废锂离子电池。这篇综述综合了LIB回收技术的最新发展,并在实验室和工业水平上对其技术机制、过程效率和可扩展性进行了关键的比较。对现有的生命周期评价和技术经济分析研究进行了批判性的比较,以评价不同回收技术的环境影响和经济可行性。这项工作通过确定关键挑战并提供未来方向,以确保电池行业的长期可持续性,为研究人员、政策制定者和行业提供明智的决策支持。虽然传统的冶金方法显示出很强的工业适用性,但它们受到高操作温度和相关温室气体排放的限制。相比之下,直接回收和升级回收方法提供了更简单和更有效的途径来保留废lib的剩余价值。然而,需要先进的预处理步骤和对故障状态的准确评估限制了实际实施。除了技术进步外,支持性政策框架和监管标准对于lib的可持续生命周期管理至关重要。本综述旨在激发创新的解决方案,将技术进步与可持续的工业实践相结合,以加强lib的循环管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Sustainable Materials and Technologies Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
158
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Materials and Technologies (SM&T), an international, cross-disciplinary, fully open access journal published by Elsevier, focuses on original full-length research articles and reviews. It covers applied or fundamental science of nano-, micro-, meso-, and macro-scale aspects of materials and technologies for sustainable development. SM&T gives special attention to contributions that bridge the knowledge gap between materials and system designs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书