Anusha Ekanayake , Samson S. Yu , Sakib T. Hossain , Hongli Su , Yihan Chen , Joe Fleming , Yongqing Zhang , Shuaifei Zhao
{"title":"Technological pathways and sustainability insights into spent lithium-ion batteries","authors":"Anusha Ekanayake , Samson S. Yu , Sakib T. Hossain , Hongli Su , Yihan Chen , Joe Fleming , Yongqing Zhang , Shuaifei Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.susmat.2026.e01859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) provides a strategic pathway toward resource circularity, carbon emission reduction, and supply chain resilience amid the growing accumulation of end-of-life LIBs. This review synthesizes state-of-the-art developments in LIB recycling technologies and provides a critical comparison of their technical mechanisms, process efficiencies, and scalability at both laboratory and industrial levels. Existing life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis studies are critically compared for evaluating the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of different recycling technologies. This work supports informed decision-making by researchers, policymakers, and industry by identifying key challenges and providing future directions to ensure the long-term sustainability of the battery industry. Although conventional metallurgical approaches demonstrate strong industrial applicability, they are limited by high operating temperatures and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, direct recycling and upcycling methods offer simpler and more efficient routes to retain the residual value of spent LIBs. However, the need for advanced pretreatment steps and reliance on accurate assessment of failure states limit practical implementation. Apart from technological advancements, supportive policy frameworks and regulatory standards are essential for the sustainable life-cycle management of LIBs. This review aims to inspire innovative solutions that combine technological advancement with sustainable industrial practices to enhance circular management of LIBs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22097,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article e01859"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993726000102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) provides a strategic pathway toward resource circularity, carbon emission reduction, and supply chain resilience amid the growing accumulation of end-of-life LIBs. This review synthesizes state-of-the-art developments in LIB recycling technologies and provides a critical comparison of their technical mechanisms, process efficiencies, and scalability at both laboratory and industrial levels. Existing life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis studies are critically compared for evaluating the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of different recycling technologies. This work supports informed decision-making by researchers, policymakers, and industry by identifying key challenges and providing future directions to ensure the long-term sustainability of the battery industry. Although conventional metallurgical approaches demonstrate strong industrial applicability, they are limited by high operating temperatures and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, direct recycling and upcycling methods offer simpler and more efficient routes to retain the residual value of spent LIBs. However, the need for advanced pretreatment steps and reliance on accurate assessment of failure states limit practical implementation. Apart from technological advancements, supportive policy frameworks and regulatory standards are essential for the sustainable life-cycle management of LIBs. This review aims to inspire innovative solutions that combine technological advancement with sustainable industrial practices to enhance circular management of LIBs.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Materials and Technologies (SM&T), an international, cross-disciplinary, fully open access journal published by Elsevier, focuses on original full-length research articles and reviews. It covers applied or fundamental science of nano-, micro-, meso-, and macro-scale aspects of materials and technologies for sustainable development. SM&T gives special attention to contributions that bridge the knowledge gap between materials and system designs.