Comparative study on the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the BB2 submarine using RANS and PANS turbulence models under straight and drift conditions

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MARINE
Changhun Lee , Hyeri Lee , I Ketut Aria Pria Utama , Woochan Seok
{"title":"Comparative study on the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the BB2 submarine using RANS and PANS turbulence models under straight and drift conditions","authors":"Changhun Lee ,&nbsp;Hyeri Lee ,&nbsp;I Ketut Aria Pria Utama ,&nbsp;Woochan Seok","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative computational analysis of the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the Joubert BB2 submarine using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and Partially-Averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) turbulence models. Simulations were performed under two representative operating conditions: straight-ahead motion and 10° drift. The numerical framework was validated against MARIN benchmark data, focusing on the total resistance and axial velocity distributions at the propeller plane. Comparative analyses demonstrated that the PANS model better captures the spatial development of turbulent kinetic energy, along with asymmetric wake features and intricate vortex interactions. The analysis included detailed comparisons of wall shear stress, axial velocity, vorticity, vortex structure and turbulent kinetic energy distributions. In particular, the PANS model demonstrated superior capability in capturing flow separation, vortex development, and wake evolution under asymmetric inflow conditions. Under both conditions, the PANS model captured more coherent vortex structures and more pronounced variations in velocity, while the RANS model exhibited overpredicted turbulence energy and more diffused wake characteristics. These findings suggest that the PANS model offers a physically consistent and computationally efficient alternative to RANS for simulating unsteady and asymmetric flows around submerged bodies, particularly in scenarios where wake dynamics critically influence propulsion and maneuvering performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14160,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678225000603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative computational analysis of the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the Joubert BB2 submarine using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and Partially-Averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) turbulence models. Simulations were performed under two representative operating conditions: straight-ahead motion and 10° drift. The numerical framework was validated against MARIN benchmark data, focusing on the total resistance and axial velocity distributions at the propeller plane. Comparative analyses demonstrated that the PANS model better captures the spatial development of turbulent kinetic energy, along with asymmetric wake features and intricate vortex interactions. The analysis included detailed comparisons of wall shear stress, axial velocity, vorticity, vortex structure and turbulent kinetic energy distributions. In particular, the PANS model demonstrated superior capability in capturing flow separation, vortex development, and wake evolution under asymmetric inflow conditions. Under both conditions, the PANS model captured more coherent vortex structures and more pronounced variations in velocity, while the RANS model exhibited overpredicted turbulence energy and more diffused wake characteristics. These findings suggest that the PANS model offers a physically consistent and computationally efficient alternative to RANS for simulating unsteady and asymmetric flows around submerged bodies, particularly in scenarios where wake dynamics critically influence propulsion and maneuvering performance.
利用RANS和PANS湍流模型对BB2潜艇在直流和漂移条件下的水动力流动特性进行了对比研究
本文采用reynolds - average Navier-Stokes (RANS)和部分平均Navier-Stokes (PANS)湍流模型对Joubert BB2潜艇周围的水动力流动特性进行了对比计算分析。在两种典型工况下进行了仿真:直线运动和10°漂移。针对MARIN基准数据对数值框架进行了验证,重点研究了螺旋桨平面的总阻力和轴向速度分布。对比分析表明,PANS模型更好地捕捉了湍流动能的空间发展,以及不对称尾迹特征和复杂的涡相互作用。分析包括壁面剪应力、轴向速度、涡量、涡结构和湍流动能分布的详细比较。特别是,在非对称入流条件下,PANS模型在捕捉流动分离、涡发展和尾迹演变方面表现出了优越的能力。在这两种情况下,PANS模型捕捉到了更连贯的涡结构和更明显的速度变化,而RANS模型则表现出湍流能量的高估和更扩散的尾迹特征。这些发现表明,PANS模型为模拟水下物体周围的非定常和非对称流动提供了一种物理上一致且计算效率高的替代方案,特别是在尾流动力学严重影响推进和机动性能的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering provides a forum for engineers and scientists from a wide range of disciplines to present and discuss various phenomena in the utilization and preservation of ocean environment. Without being limited by the traditional categorization, it is encouraged to present advanced technology development and scientific research, as long as they are aimed for more and better human engagement with ocean environment. Topics include, but not limited to: marine hydrodynamics; structural mechanics; marine propulsion system; design methodology & practice; production technology; system dynamics & control; marine equipment technology; materials science; underwater acoustics; ocean remote sensing; and information technology related to ship and marine systems; ocean energy systems; marine environmental engineering; maritime safety engineering; polar & arctic engineering; coastal & port engineering; subsea engineering; and specialized watercraft engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书