Comparative study on the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the BB2 submarine using RANS and PANS turbulence models under straight and drift conditions
Changhun Lee , Hyeri Lee , I Ketut Aria Pria Utama , Woochan Seok
{"title":"Comparative study on the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the BB2 submarine using RANS and PANS turbulence models under straight and drift conditions","authors":"Changhun Lee , Hyeri Lee , I Ketut Aria Pria Utama , Woochan Seok","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative computational analysis of the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the Joubert BB2 submarine using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and Partially-Averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) turbulence models. Simulations were performed under two representative operating conditions: straight-ahead motion and 10° drift. The numerical framework was validated against MARIN benchmark data, focusing on the total resistance and axial velocity distributions at the propeller plane. Comparative analyses demonstrated that the PANS model better captures the spatial development of turbulent kinetic energy, along with asymmetric wake features and intricate vortex interactions. The analysis included detailed comparisons of wall shear stress, axial velocity, vorticity, vortex structure and turbulent kinetic energy distributions. In particular, the PANS model demonstrated superior capability in capturing flow separation, vortex development, and wake evolution under asymmetric inflow conditions. Under both conditions, the PANS model captured more coherent vortex structures and more pronounced variations in velocity, while the RANS model exhibited overpredicted turbulence energy and more diffused wake characteristics. These findings suggest that the PANS model offers a physically consistent and computationally efficient alternative to RANS for simulating unsteady and asymmetric flows around submerged bodies, particularly in scenarios where wake dynamics critically influence propulsion and maneuvering performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14160,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678225000603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comparative computational analysis of the hydrodynamic flow characteristics around the Joubert BB2 submarine using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and Partially-Averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) turbulence models. Simulations were performed under two representative operating conditions: straight-ahead motion and 10° drift. The numerical framework was validated against MARIN benchmark data, focusing on the total resistance and axial velocity distributions at the propeller plane. Comparative analyses demonstrated that the PANS model better captures the spatial development of turbulent kinetic energy, along with asymmetric wake features and intricate vortex interactions. The analysis included detailed comparisons of wall shear stress, axial velocity, vorticity, vortex structure and turbulent kinetic energy distributions. In particular, the PANS model demonstrated superior capability in capturing flow separation, vortex development, and wake evolution under asymmetric inflow conditions. Under both conditions, the PANS model captured more coherent vortex structures and more pronounced variations in velocity, while the RANS model exhibited overpredicted turbulence energy and more diffused wake characteristics. These findings suggest that the PANS model offers a physically consistent and computationally efficient alternative to RANS for simulating unsteady and asymmetric flows around submerged bodies, particularly in scenarios where wake dynamics critically influence propulsion and maneuvering performance.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering provides a forum for engineers and scientists from a wide range of disciplines to present and discuss various phenomena in the utilization and preservation of ocean environment. Without being limited by the traditional categorization, it is encouraged to present advanced technology development and scientific research, as long as they are aimed for more and better human engagement with ocean environment. Topics include, but not limited to: marine hydrodynamics; structural mechanics; marine propulsion system; design methodology & practice; production technology; system dynamics & control; marine equipment technology; materials science; underwater acoustics; ocean remote sensing; and information technology related to ship and marine systems; ocean energy systems; marine environmental engineering; maritime safety engineering; polar & arctic engineering; coastal & port engineering; subsea engineering; and specialized watercraft engineering.